Literature DB >> 11549493

Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable.

H Lepor1, A M Nieder, M C Fraiman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and desirability of removing the urinary catheter 7 days after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
METHODS: Between February 28, 2000 and October 5, 2000, 184 men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. Of these men, 97% underwent gravity cystography under fluoroscopic control on postoperative day (POD) 7. The indwelling urinary catheter was removed on POD 7 if no evidence of extravasation was observed on cystography. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire at the time of catheter removal to capture the degree of bother from incisional pain and the indwelling urinary catheter during the recovery period. The level of urinary continence was determined at 3 months after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five of the cystograms (75%) had no evidence of extravasation. The indwelling catheters were removed in 130 (97%) of 135 cases. The body weight, surgical specimen weight, presence or absence of intraoperative anastomotic extravasation, volume of pelvic drainage recorded from the Hemovac drain, and creatinine level of the pelvic drainage fluids did not predict the finding of extravasation on the POD 7 cystogram. Fifteen percent of the men whose catheters were removed on POD 7 developed acute urinary retention. At 3 months, 72% of men required no or a single protective pad, and 87% indicated they experienced no or slight bother from incontinence. These continence outcomes are comparable with a historical control group by the same surgeon who underwent catheter removal on POD 14. Forty-five percent of the men reported the catheter caused moderate to severe bother, compared with only 19% of men who indicated moderate to severe bother from incisional pain. In retrospect, 95.6% of men indicated willingness to undergo cystography on POD 7 with the intent of early catheter removal.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that most men will have no extravasation on a cystogram performed on POD 7 and that removing the catheter at this time in these cases does not increase the risk of complications or compromise overall urinary continence. The urinary catheter is a significant bother and limits physical activity during the postoperative period. Cystography and early removal of the catheter is both feasible and desirable and should be offered to men after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11549493     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01218-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  31 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Managing and preventing acute urinary retention.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serkan Altinova; Ege Can Serefoglu; Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The single needle method for urethrovesical anastomosis with strengthened posterior fixation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Zhenghua Ju; Chao Wang; Xing Ai; Xin Ma; Taoping Shi; Guoxi Zhang; Baojun Wang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2009-12-29

5.  Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

6.  Early removal of urinary catheter after excision and primary anastomosis in anterior urethral stricture.

Authors:  Ankur Bansal; Satyanarayan Sankhwar; Ashok Gupta; Kawaljit Singh; Madhusudan Patodia; Ruchir Aeron
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

7.  Vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) evaluation of short- and long-term outcome after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP): selective cystogram to improve outcome.

Authors:  C Tillier; H A M van Muilekom; J Bloos-van der Hulst; N Grivas; H G van der Poel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-12

8.  Removing the urinary catheter on post-operative day 2 after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study from a single high-volume referral centre.

Authors:  Aldo Brassetti; Flavia Proietti; Antonio Cardi; Antonio De Vico; Antonio Iannello; Alberto Pansadoro; Aldo Scapellato; Tommaso Riga; Paolo Emiliozzi; Gianluca D'Elia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-11-25

9.  Transrectal ultrasound guidance for early transurethral recatheterization after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Marco Raber
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04-08

10.  Supra-pubic versus urethral catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: systematic review of current evidence.

Authors:  Riccardo Bertolo; Andrew Tracey; Prokar Dasgupta; Bernardo Rocco; Salvatore Micali; Giampaolo Bianchi; Lance Hampton; Ash K Tewari; Francesco Porpiglia; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.