Literature DB >> 16194712

Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta").

Fernando J Bianco1, Peter T Scardino, James A Eastham.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy (RP) disrupts the natural history of prostate cancer. However, it could be a significant source of long-term incontinence and potency morbidity. We studied the long-term cancer survival results and the probabilities of achieving ideal "trifecta" outcomes (cancer control, continence, and potency) after this surgical procedure. A total of 1746 intervention-naive patients with clinically localized newly diagnosed prostate cancer underwent RP with curative intent beginning in 1983. The mean follow-up time was 6 years (interquartile range, 3-9). The successive probabilities of achieving ideal trifecta outcomes for up to 24 months following RP versus experiencing biochemical recurrence were estimated using the cumulative incidence method. Additionally, long-term cancer control was assessed by preoperative and postoperative factors. Surgical excision controlled prostate cancer effectively in 1441 (83%) of the 1746 patients studied. At 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, 82%, 77%, and 75% of patients were free from disease progression. Cancer-specific survival was 99%, 95% and 89%, respectively, at 5, 10, and 15 years. In men with disease progression, the 15-year probabilities of death from prostate cancer versus other causes were similar (32% and 33%, respectively). At 24 months, 60% of patients were potent, continent, and free of cancer, and 12% had experienced recurrence. Use of RP provided excellent long-term cancer control. At 15 years, only 11% of patients had died of prostate cancer. Cancer control was good even for patients with adverse prognostic features. The probability of death from cancer was similar to other causes after disease progression. By 2 years, 60% of men were continent, potent, and cancer free.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16194712     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  126 in total

1.  HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alan I So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Variations in the quality of care at radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Jesse Sammon; Jay Jhaveri; Maxine Sun; Khurshid R Ghani; Jan Schmitges; Wooju Jeong; James O Peabody; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Mani Menon
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Factors predicting early return of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 4.  Evidence-based comparison of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  William T Lowrance; Tatum V Tarin; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2010-11-16

5.  Homemade laparoscopic surgical simulator: a cost-effective solution to the challenge of acquiring laparoscopic skills?

Authors:  A Aslam; G J Nason; S K Giri
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Optimizing radical prostatectomy for the early recovery of urinary continence.

Authors:  Harveer S Dev; Prasanna Sooriakumaran; Abhishek Srivastava; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Intraoperative Frozen Section of the Prostate Reduces the Risk of Positive Margin Whilst Ensuring Nerve Sparing in Patients with Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: First Reported UK Series.

Authors:  Nikhil Vasdev; Samita Agarwal; Bhavan P Rai; Arany Soosainathan; Gregory Shaw; Sebastian Chang; Venkat Prasad; Gowrie Mohan-S; James M Adshead
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-05-20

8.  Outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men receiving previous pelvic radiation for non-prostate malignancies.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Alexei Wedmid; Jaspreet S Sandhu; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  High prostatic fascia release or standard nerve sparing? A viewpoint from the Royal Melbourne Hospital.

Authors:  Declan G Murphy; Anthony J Costello
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-08-28

10.  Fluorescent Image-Guided Surgery with an Anti-Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA) Diabody Enables Targeted Resection of Mouse Prostate Cancer Xenografts in Real Time.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Andrew S Behesnilian; Ziyue Karen Jiang; Kirstin A Zettlitz; Eric J Lepin; Laurent A Bentolila; Scott M Knowles; Daniel Lawrence; Anna M Wu; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.