Literature DB >> 12559288

Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Rupa Patel1, Herbert Lepor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility and safety of removing the urinary catheter on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
METHODS: Between January 2001 and August 2001, gravity cystography was performed on POD 3 or 4 after RRP by a single surgeon (H.L.) on 151 men. The urinary catheter was removed on POD 3 or 4 providing no extravasation was evident on cystography. Urinary catheters were replaced over a guidewire placed into the bladder under flexible cystoscopic guidance in cases of acute urinary retention (AUR). Continence was assessed at 3 months after RRP.
RESULTS: Of the 151 cystograms performed on POD 3 or 4, 116 (76.8%) revealed no evidence of extravasation. The indwelling catheters were removed in 114 of these cases (98.3%). Twenty-two (19.3%) of the 114 men whose catheters were removed on POD 3 or 4 developed AUR within 48 hours of catheter removal, requiring catheter replacement. Two of these patients required repeated surgery secondary to complications related to AUR. At 3 months after RRP, 75% of the men whose catheters were removed on POD 3 or 4 required no pads or a single pad during a 24-hour interval, and 77.6% reported none or slight bother from incontinence. Of the 37 men whose catheters were removed on POD 7 or later, 1 patient (2.7%) developed AUR, and the catheter was replaced without complications. At 3 months after RRP, 65.7% of men whose catheters were removed on POD 7 or later required no pads or a single pad during a 24-hour interval, and 71.4% reported none or slight bother from incontinence. The incidence of anastomotic stricture in men whose catheters were removed on POD 3 or 4 and POD 7 or later was 12.1% and 22.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Most men will have a watertight anastomosis on POD 3 or 4 after RRP. Early catheter removal does not have a negative impact on continence or the rate of anastomotic strictures. Because of the high incidence of AUR, requiring replacement of the urinary catheter, and the potential for disruption of the anastomosis or bladder neck reconstruction, we currently recommend delaying catheter removal until POD 7 or later.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12559288     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02105-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  19 in total

1.  [Postoperative monitoring of anastomosis after radical retropubic prostatectomy Transrectal ultrasound can replace cystography?].

Authors:  T Eggert; J Palisaar; P Metz; J Noldus
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

3.  Managing and preventing acute urinary retention.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The case for open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nadeem Shaida; Peter R Malone
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serkan Altinova; Ege Can Serefoglu; Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Status of radical prostatectomy in 2009: is there medical evidence to justify the robotic approach?

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

7.  Vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) evaluation of short- and long-term outcome after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP): selective cystogram to improve outcome.

Authors:  C Tillier; H A M van Muilekom; J Bloos-van der Hulst; N Grivas; H G van der Poel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-12

8.  Removing the urinary catheter on post-operative day 2 after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a feasibility study from a single high-volume referral centre.

Authors:  Aldo Brassetti; Flavia Proietti; Antonio Cardi; Antonio De Vico; Antonio Iannello; Alberto Pansadoro; Aldo Scapellato; Tommaso Riga; Paolo Emiliozzi; Gianluca D'Elia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-11-25

9.  Endourological management of misplaced urethral catheter after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  S Shillito; A Bourdoumis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  The risk of urinary retention following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on early continence outcomes.

Authors:  Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Khaled Ajib; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.