Literature DB >> 11586197

Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

A Nadu1, L Salomon, A Hoznek, L E Olsson, F Saint, A de La Taille, A Cicco, D Chopin, C C Abbou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively tested the safety of routine removal of the catheter as early as 2 to 4 days after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1998 and March 2001, 228 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for clinically organ confined prostate cancer. The last 113 consecutive patients were included in a prospective study according to gravitational cystography performed 2 to 4 days postoperatively. If no leak was seen the catheter was removed. If a leak was apparent the catheter was left indwelling for another 6 days and cystography was repeated.
RESULTS: Cystography 2 to 4 days postoperatively showed an anastomosis without a leak in 96 (84.9%) patients who subsequently had the catheters removed. There were 28 patients who had the catheter removed on postoperative day 2, 28 day 3 and 40 day 4. In 17 (15.1%) patients an anastomotic leak was observed, and the catheter was not removed at that time. Of the 96 patients in whom the catheter was removed early 10 (10.4%) had urinary retention that necessitated re-catheterization. This procedure was performed without the need for cystoscopy. After the catheter was removed all patients were able to void 24 hours later. Median followup was 7 months (range 1 to 15) and showed continence rates greater than 93%. No anastomotic stricture, pelvic abscess or urinoma developed in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo laparoscopic radical prostatectomy can have the catheter safely removed 2 to 4 days postoperatively without a higher risk of incontinence, stricture or leak related problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11586197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: published series.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre De La Taille; Leif E Olsson; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  András Hoznek; David B Samadi; Laurent Salomon; Leif E Olsson; Fabien Saint; Dominique Chopin; Clément-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Intensive laparoscopic training: the impact of a simplified pelvic-trainer model for the urethrovesical anastomosis on the learning curve.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle De Vries; Wolfgang Dillenburg; Matthias Moeckel; Eduard Becht
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The case for open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nadeem Shaida; Peter R Malone
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Serkan Altinova; Ege Can Serefoglu; Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dogu Teber; Tibet Erdogru; Joanne Cresswell; Ali Serdar Gözen; Thomas Frede; Jens J Rassweiler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  [Algorithm for the treatment of anastomotic failure after laparoscopic prostatectomy].

Authors:  H M Do; T Franz; J-U Stolzenburg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Vesico-urethral anastomosis (VUA) evaluation of short- and long-term outcome after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP): selective cystogram to improve outcome.

Authors:  C Tillier; H A M van Muilekom; J Bloos-van der Hulst; N Grivas; H G van der Poel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-01-12

10.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: surgical technique and current results.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; Mani Menon
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.