Literature DB >> 29554465

The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Sandra J Lee1,2,3, Xiaoxue Li1,3, Hui Huang1, Marvin Zelen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present updated features to a model developed by Dana-Farber investigators within the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET). The initial model was developed to evaluate the impact of mammography screening strategies.
METHODS: This major update includes the incorporation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as part of the natural history of breast cancer. The updated model allows DCIS in the pre-clinical state to regress to undetectable early-stage DCIS, or to transition to invasive breast cancer, or to clinical DCIS. We summarize model assumptions for DCIS natural history and model parameters. Another new development is the derivation of analytical expressions for overdiagnosis. Overdiagnosis refers to mammographic identification of breast cancer that would never have resulted in disease symptoms in the patient's remaining lifetime (i.e., lead time longer than residual survival time). This is an inevitable consequence of early detection. Our model uniquely assesses overdiagnosis using an analytical formulation. We derive the lead time distribution resulting from the early detection of invasive breast cancer and DCIS, and formulate the analytical expression for overdiagnosis.
RESULTS: This formulation was applied to assess overdiagnosis from mammography screening. Other model updates involve implementing common model input parameters with updated treatment dissemination and effectiveness, and improved mammography performance. Lastly, the model was expanded to incorporate subgroups by breast density and molecular subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of DCIS and subgroups and the derivation of an overdiagnosis estimation procedure improve the model for evaluating mammography screening programs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ductal carcinoma in situ; lead time; mammography screening; overdiagnosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554465      PMCID: PMC5929104          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17741634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  20 in total

1.  Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations.

Authors:  Y Shen; M Zelen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Rethinking the Standard for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Christina Yau
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Jeroen J van den Broek; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Diego Munoz; Sandra J Lee; Donald A Berry; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Oguzhan Alagoz; Karla Kerlikowske; Anna N A Tosteson; Aimee M Near; Amanda Hoeffken; Yaojen Chang; Eveline A Heijnsdijk; Gary Chisholm; Xuelin Huang; Hui Huang; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Ronald Gangnon; Brian L Sprague; Sylvia Plevritis; Eric Feuer; Harry J de Koning; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Changes in incidence of in situ and invasive breast cancer by histology type following mammography screening.

Authors:  Colin Luke; Kevin Priest; David Roder
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

5.  Mortality modeling of early detection programs.

Authors:  Sandra J Lee; Marvin Zelen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Diego Munoz; Aimee M Near; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Elizabeth S Burnside; Yaojen Chang; Gary Chisholm; Harry J de Koning; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Hui Huang; Natasha K Stout; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Cancer statistics: Breast cancer in situ.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Carol E DeSantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Joan L Kramer; Ahmedin Jemal; Betsy Kohler; Otis W Brawley; Ted Gansler
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Diana L Miglioretti; Natasha K Stout; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Diana S M Buist; Hui Huang; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Aimee M Near; Karla Kerlikowske; Heidi D Nelson; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Lobular neoplasia on core needle biopsy does not require excision.

Authors:  Chandandeep S Nagi; James E O'Donnell; Mikhail Tismenetsky; Ira J Bleiweiss; Shabnam M Jaffer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  The changing incidence of in situ and invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Christie R Eheman; Kate M Shaw; Aliza Blythe Ryerson; Jacqueline W Miller; Umed A Ajani; Mary C White
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  8 in total

1.  Association of Screening and Treatment With Breast Cancer Mortality by Molecular Subtype in US Women, 2000-2012.

Authors:  Sylvia K Plevritis; Diego Munoz; Allison W Kurian; Natasha K Stout; Oguzhan Alagoz; Aimee M Near; Sandra J Lee; Jeroen J van den Broek; Xuelin Huang; Clyde B Schechter; Brian L Sprague; Juhee Song; Harry J de Koning; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Ronald Gangnon; Young Chandler; Yisheng Li; Cong Xu; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Hui Huang; Donald A Berry; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Patient Navigation Can Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes among African American Women in Chicago: Insights from a Modeling Study.

Authors:  Aditya S Khanna; Bryan Brickman; Michael Cronin; Nyahne Q Bergeron; John R Scheel; Joseph Hibdon; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Karriem S Watson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.801

3.  Estimation of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis in a U.S. Breast Screening Cohort.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Jane Lange; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Ellen S O'Meara; Charlotte Gard; Diana L Miglioretti; Jean-Luc Bulliard; Andrew F Brouwer; E Shelley Hwang; Ruth B Etzioni
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 51.598

4.  Long-Term Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the United States.

Authors:  Kathryn P Lowry; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; William E Barlow; Elizabeth S Burnside; Emily F Conant; John M Hampton; Hui Huang; Karla Kerlikowske; Sandra J Lee; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Martin J Yaffe; Natasha K Stout
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Cancer screening simulation models: a state of the art review.

Authors:  Aleksandr Bespalov; Anton Barchuk; Anssi Auvinen; Jaakko Nevalainen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Benefits and harms of annual, biennial, or triennial breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).

Authors:  Carlos Canelo-Aybar; Margarita Posso; Nadia Montero; Ivan Solà; Zuleika Saz-Parkinson; Stephen W Duffy; Markus Follmann; Axel Gräwingholt; Paolo Giorgi Rossi; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 9.075

Review 7.  Reflecting on 20 years of breast cancer modeling in CISNET: Recommendations for future cancer systems modeling efforts.

Authors:  Amy Trentham-Dietz; Oguzhan Alagoz; Christina Chapman; Xuelin Huang; Jinani Jayasekera; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Jennifer M Yeh; Sylvia K Plevritis; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Modeling the natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ based on population data.

Authors:  Sarocha Chootipongchaivat; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Xiaoxue Li; Hui Huang; Harald Weedon-Fekjær; Marc D Ryser; Donald L Weaver; Elizabeth S Burnside; Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 6.466

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.