Literature DB >> 19454615

The changing incidence of in situ and invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: United States, 1999-2004.

Christie R Eheman1, Kate M Shaw, Aliza Blythe Ryerson, Jacqueline W Miller, Umed A Ajani, Mary C White.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National incidence rates for lobular and ductal breast cancers have not been available previously. Evidence suggests that the increased risk of breast cancer associated with combined hormone replacement therapy use is higher for invasive lobular cancers (ILC) than for invasive ductal cancers (IDC). This study provides U.S. incidence rates for these histologic types for both in situ and invasive cancers and assesses changes in the incidence of these cancers over time.
METHODS: Data for this study included incident ductal and lobular breast cancer cases diagnosed from 1999 through 2004 in central cancer registries in 44 states and the District of Columbia from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. We estimated incidence per 100,000 women by 10-year age groups, race, and ethnicity. We also assessed the percent change in invasive and in situ cancer incidence over time.
RESULTS: We observed distinct differences in the change of incidence over time between in situ and invasive lobular and ductal breast cancers. The age-adjusted rates of ILC and IDC declined an average of 4.6% and 3.3% per year, respectively. Overall, ILC decreased 20.5% from 1999 to 2004. The patterns of ductal and lobular in situ cancer incidence were not consistent over time, and the total change was negligible.
CONCLUSION: The declines in ILC observed in our study are consistent with a decrease in cancer incidence related to a reduced use of combined hormone replacement therapy. However, other factors could also be responsible for these changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454615     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  27 in total

1.  Epidemiologic Risk Factors for In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancers Among Postmenopausal Women in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Zeina G Khodr; Cher M Dallal; Sarah J Nyante; Mark E Sherman; Roni Falk; Linda M Liao; Jeffrey Love; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Systemic Staging of Newly Diagnosed Invasive Lobular Carcinoma Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Molly P Hogan; Debra A Goldman; Brittany Dashevsky; Christopher C Riedl; Mithat Gönen; Joseph R Osborne; Maxine Jochelson; Clifford Hudis; Monica Morrow; Gary A Ulaner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  The history and use of cancer registry data by public health cancer control programs in the United States.

Authors:  Mary C White; Frances Babcock; Nikki S Hayes; Angela B Mariotto; Faye L Wong; Betsy A Kohler; Hannah K Weir
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Head-to-Head Evaluation of 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Metastatic Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Gary A Ulaner; Komal Jhaveri; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Vaios Hatzoglou; Christopher C Riedl; Jason S Lewis; Audrey Mauguen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Late age at first full term birth is strongly associated with lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Shaneda Warren Andersen; E Robert Greenberg; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Authors:  Sandra J Lee; Xiaoxue Li; Hui Huang; Marvin Zelen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Breast cancer classification and prognostication through diverse systems along with recent emerging findings in this respect; the dawn of new perspectives in the clinical applications.

Authors:  Vida Pourteimoor; Samira Mohammadi-Yeganeh; Mahdi Paryan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-09-20

8.  The National Prevention Strategy and breast cancer screening: scientific evidence for public health action.

Authors:  Marcus Plescia; Mary C White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Clinicopathological characteristics of infiltrating lobular breast carcinoma in elderly women: Preliminary results.

Authors:  Alvaro Ruibal; Pablo Aguiar; Maria Del Camen Del Río; Primitiva Menéndez; José Ignacio Arias; Michel Herranz
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-28

Review 10.  [Invasive breast cancer: the current WHO classification].

Authors:  A Lebeau; M Kriegsmann; E Burandt; H-P Sinn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.