Literature DB >> 29318276

Association of Screening and Treatment With Breast Cancer Mortality by Molecular Subtype in US Women, 2000-2012.

Sylvia K Plevritis1, Diego Munoz1, Allison W Kurian2, Natasha K Stout3, Oguzhan Alagoz4,5, Aimee M Near6, Sandra J Lee7, Jeroen J van den Broek8, Xuelin Huang9, Clyde B Schechter10, Brian L Sprague11, Juhee Song9, Harry J de Koning8, Amy Trentham-Dietz5, Nicolien T van Ravesteyn8, Ronald Gangnon5,12, Young Chandler6, Yisheng Li9, Cong Xu1, Mehmet Ali Ergun4, Hui Huang7, Donald A Berry9, Jeanne S Mandelblatt6.   

Abstract

Importance: Given recent advances in screening mammography and adjuvant therapy (treatment), quantifying their separate and combined effects on US breast cancer mortality reductions by molecular subtype could guide future decisions to reduce disease burden. Objective: To evaluate the contributions associated with screening and treatment to breast cancer mortality reductions by molecular subtype based on estrogen-receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2, formerly HER2 or HER2/neu). Design, Setting, and Participants: Six Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Network (CISNET) models simulated US breast cancer mortality from 2000 to 2012 using national data on plain-film and digital mammography patterns and performance, dissemination and efficacy of ER/ERBB2-specific treatment, and competing mortality. Multiple US birth cohorts were simulated. Exposures: Screening mammography and treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The models compared age-adjusted, overall, and ER/ERBB2-specific breast cancer mortality rates from 2000 to 2012 for women aged 30 to 79 years relative to the estimated mortality rate in the absence of screening and treatment (baseline rate); mortality reductions were apportioned to screening and treatment.
Results: In 2000, the estimated reduction in overall breast cancer mortality rate was 37% (model range, 27%-42%) relative to the estimated baseline rate in 2000 of 64 deaths (model range, 56-73) per 100 000 women: 44% (model range, 35%-60%) of this reduction was associated with screening and 56% (model range, 40%-65%) with treatment. In 2012, the estimated reduction in overall breast cancer mortality rate was 49% (model range, 39%-58%) relative to the estimated baseline rate in 2012 of 63 deaths (model range, 54-73) per 100 000 women: 37% (model range, 26%-51%) of this reduction was associated with screening and 63% (model range, 49%-74%) with treatment. Of the 63% associated with treatment, 31% (model range, 22%-37%) was associated with chemotherapy, 27% (model range, 18%-36%) with hormone therapy, and 4% (model range, 1%-6%) with trastuzumab. The estimated relative contributions associated with screening vs treatment varied by molecular subtype: for ER+/ERBB2-, 36% (model range, 24%-50%) vs 64% (model range, 50%-76%); for ER+/ERBB2+, 31% (model range, 23%-41%) vs 69% (model range, 59%-77%); for ER-/ERBB2+, 40% (model range, 34%-47%) vs 60% (model range, 53%-66%); and for ER-/ERBB2-, 48% (model range, 38%-57%) vs 52% (model range, 44%-62%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this simulation modeling study that projected trends in breast cancer mortality rates among US women, decreases in overall breast cancer mortality from 2000 to 2012 were associated with advances in screening and in adjuvant therapy, although the associations varied by breast cancer molecular subtype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29318276      PMCID: PMC5833658          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  34 in total

1.  UK and USA breast cancer deaths down 25% in year 2000 at ages 20-69 years.

Authors:  R Peto; J Boreham; M Clarke; C Davies; V Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Estrogen Receptor Status and the Future Burden of Invasive and In Situ Breast Cancers in the United States.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; Kimberly A Barker; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Trends in use of adjuvant multi-agent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Angela Mariotto; Eric J Feuer; Linda C Harlan; Lap-Ming Wun; Karen A Johnson; Jeffrey Abrams
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Diego Munoz; Aimee M Near; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Elizabeth S Burnside; Yaojen Chang; Gary Chisholm; Harry J de Koning; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Hui Huang; Natasha K Stout; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975-1999.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Clifford Hudis; Colin B Begg; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Binbing Yu; Martin Krapcho; Diana L Miglioretti; Michael P Fay; Grant Izmirlian; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Berta M Geller; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Breast cancer mortality trends in the United States according to estrogen receptor status and age at diagnosis.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Bingshu E Chen; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Improvements in US Breast Cancer Survival and Proportion Explained by Tumor Size and Estrogen-Receptor Status.

Authors:  Ju-Hyun Park; William F Anderson; Mitchell H Gail
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  66 in total

1.  Experience of women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review of qualitative research.

Authors:  Liping Liu; Yanni Wu; Weilian Cong; Mingyu Hu; Xiaoxia Li; Chunlan Zhou
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Simulation of Chemotherapy Effects in Older Breast Cancer Patients With High Recurrence Scores.

Authors:  Young Chandler; Jinani C Jayasekera; Clyde B Schechter; Claudine Isaacs; Christopher J Cadham; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  The breast surgeons' approach to mastectomy and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Toni Storm-Dickerson; Noemi M Sigalove
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

4.  Clinical Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening for Survivors of Childhood Cancer Treated With Chest Radiation : A Comparative Modeling Study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yeh; Kathryn P Lowry; Clyde B Schechter; Lisa R Diller; Oguzhan Alagoz; Gregory T Armstrong; John M Hampton; Wendy Leisenring; Qi Liu; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Diana L Miglioretti; Chaya S Moskowitz; Kevin C Oeffinger; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Natasha K Stout
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Efficacy of Affibody-Based Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Vascular B7-H3 for Breast Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Rakesh Bam; Patrick S Lown; Lawrence A Stern; Karina Sharma; Katheryne E Wilson; Gregory R Bean; Amelie M Lutz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Benjamin J Hackel; Jeremy Dahl; Lotfi Abou-Elkacem
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Incidence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in the United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Laura H Hendrix; Mathias Worni; Yiling Liu; Terry Hyslop; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  Delving deeper into disparity: The impact of health literacy on the surgical care of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jaclyn N Portelli Tremont; Stephanie Downs-Canner; Ugwuji Maduekwe
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  DNA Methylation Markers for Breast Cancer Detection in the Developing World.

Authors:  Bradley M Downs; Claudia Mercado-Rodriguez; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Chuang Chen; Jing-Ping Yuan; Eunice Van Den Berg; Leslie M Cope; Fernando Schmitt; Gary M Tse; Syed Z Ali; Danielle Meir-Levi; Rupali Sood; Juanjuan Li; Andrea L Richardson; Marina B Mosunjac; Monica Rizzo; Suzana Tulac; Kriszten J Kocmond; Timothy de Guzman; Edwin W Lai; Brian Rhees; Michael Bates; Antonio C Wolff; Edward Gabrielson; Susan C Harvey; Christopher B Umbricht; Kala Visvanathan; Mary Jo Fackler; Saraswati Sukumar
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.

Authors:  Emily F Conant; Samantha P Zuckerman; Elizabeth S McDonald; Susan P Weinstein; Katrina E Korhonen; Julia A Birnbaum; Jennifer D Tobey; Mitchell D Schnall; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Total Body Irradiation and Risk of Breast Cancer After Blood or Marrow Transplantation: A Blood or Marrow Transplantation Survivor Study Report.

Authors:  Andrew M McDonald; Yanjun Chen; Jessica Wu; Lindsey Hageman; Liton Francisco; Michelle Kung; F Lennie Wong; Emily Ness; Wendy Landier; Kevin Battles; Donna Salzman; Daniel J Weisdorf; Stephen J Forman; Mukta Arora; Saro H Armenian; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.