Literature DB >> 11481355

Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: mammograms and physical examinations.

Y Shen1, M Zelen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate sensitivities of breast cancer screening modalities and preclinical duration of the disease from eight breast cancer screening clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screening programs invariably lead to diagnosis of disease before signs or symptoms are present. Two key quantities of screening programs are the sensitivity of the disease detection modality and the mean sojourn time (MST). The observed screening histories in a periodically screened cohort make it possible to estimate these quantities of interest. We applied recently developed statistical methods to data from eight randomized breast cancer screening trials to estimate the sensitivities of early detection modalities and MST. Moreover, when a screening trial involved two screening modalities, our methods enabled the estimation of the individual sensitivity of each screening modality.
RESULTS: We analyzed breast cancer data from several screening trials and have relatively complete data from the Health Insurance Plan (HIP), Edinburgh, and two Canadian studies. The screening sensitivity for mammography, physical examination, and MST were, respectively, HIP: 0.39, 0.47, and 2.5 years; Edinburgh: 0.63, 0.40, and 4.3 years; Canadian (age 40 to 49 at entry): 0.61, 0.59, and 1.9 years; Canadian (age 50 to 59 at entry): 0.66, 0.39, and 3.1 years.
CONCLUSION: The public debate on early breast cancer detection is mainly centered on mammograms. However, the current study indicates that a physical examination is of comparable importance. Cautious interpretation of trial differences is required as a result of various experimental designs and the age dependency of screening sensitivity and MST.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11481355     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  30 in total

1.  A reality check for overdiagnosis estimates associated with breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Jing Xia; Rebecca Hubbard; Noel S Weiss; Roman Gulati
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Risk-specific optimal cancer screening schedules: an application to breast cancer early detection.

Authors:  Charlotte Hsieh Ahern; Yi Cheng; Yu Shen
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-12

3.  Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta Klatzky; Randy Lee; Vikas Shivaprabhu; John Galeotti; Mel Siegel; Joel S Schuman; Ralph Hollis; George Stetten
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Conditions for Valid Empirical Estimates of Cancer Overdiagnosis in Randomized Trials and Population Studies.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Eric J Feuer; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Estimating the frequency of indolent breast cancer in screening trials.

Authors:  Yu Shen; Wenli Dong; Roman Gulati; Marc D Ryser; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Comparison of mammography sensitivity after reduction mammoplasty targeting the glandular and fat tissue.

Authors:  Murat Çakır; Tevfik Küçükkartallar; Ahmet Tekin; Nebil Selimoğlu; Necdet Poyraz; Mehmet Metin Belviranlı; Adil Kartal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Modeling grade progression in an active surveillance study.

Authors:  Lurdes Y T Inoue; Bruce J Trock; Alan W Partin; Herbert B Carter; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Estimating key parameters in periodic breast cancer screening-application to the Canadian National Breast Screening Study data.

Authors:  Yinlu Chen; Guy Brock; Dongfeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  The Dana-Farber CISNET Model for Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: An Update.

Authors:  Sandra J Lee; Xiaoxue Li; Hui Huang; Marvin Zelen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Breast cancer incidence and overdiagnosis in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  Montserrat Martinez-Alonso; Ester Vilaprinyo; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Montserrat Rue
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.