Literature DB >> 35941401

Patient Navigation Can Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes among African American Women in Chicago: Insights from a Modeling Study.

Aditya S Khanna1, Bryan Brickman2, Michael Cronin3, Nyahne Q Bergeron4, John R Scheel5, Joseph Hibdon6, Elizabeth A Calhoun7, Karriem S Watson8, Shaila M Strayhorn9, Yamilé Molina4.   

Abstract

African American (AA) women experience much greater mortality due to breast cancer (BC) than non-Latino Whites (NLW). Clinical patient navigation is an evidence-based strategy used by healthcare institutions to improve AA women's breast cancer outcomes. While empirical research has demonstrated the potential effect of navigation interventions for individuals, the population-level impact of navigation on screening, diagnostic completion, and stage at diagnosis has not been assessed. An agent-based model (ABM), representing 50-74-year-old AA women and parameterized with locally sourced data from Chicago, is developed to simulate screening mammography, diagnostic resolution, and stage at diagnosis of cancer. The ABM simulated three counterfactual scenarios: (1) a control setting without any navigation that represents the "standard of care"; (2) a clinical navigation scenario, where agents receive navigation from hospital-affiliated staff; and (3) a setting with network navigation, where agents receive clinical navigation and/or social network navigation (i.e., receiving support from clinically navigated agents for breast cancer care). In the control setting, the mean population-level screening mammography rate was 46.3% (95% CI: 46.2%, 46.4%), the diagnostic completion rate was 80.2% (95% CI: 79.9%, 80.5%), and the mean early cancer diagnosis rate was 65.9% (95% CI: 65.1%, 66.7%). Simulation results suggest that network navigation may lead up to a 13% increase in screening completion rate, 7.8% increase in diagnostic resolution rate, and a 4.9% increase in early-stage diagnoses at the population-level. Results suggest that systems science methods can be useful in the adoption of clinical and network navigation policies to reduce breast cancer disparities.
© 2022. The New York Academy of Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; Breast cancer screening; Computer simulation; Early diagnosis; Preventive medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35941401     DOI: 10.1007/s11524-022-00669-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   5.801


  36 in total

Review 1.  Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy.

Authors:  Carol H Lee
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Richard N Ross; Joseph G Reiter; Bijan A Niknam; Alexander S Hill; Diana M Bongiorno; Shivani A Shah; Lauren L Hochman; Orit Even-Shoshan; Kevin R Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Controversies in Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Monique Swain; Myrlene Jeudy; Mark D Pearlman
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Patterns and Trends in Age-Specific Black-White Differences in Breast Cancer Incidence and Mortality - United States, 1999-2014.

Authors:  Lisa C Richardson; S Jane Henley; Jacqueline W Miller; Greta Massetti; Cheryll C Thomas
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Hannah M Linden; Lisa M Reisch; John Z Ayanian; Eric B Larson
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Screening mammography benefit controversies: sorting the evidence.

Authors:  Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Reasons for delay in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  L S Caplan; K J Helzlsouer; S Shapiro; M N Wesley; B K Edwards
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Social determinants of breast cancer risk, stage, and survival.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography.

Authors:  S W Chang; K Kerlikowske; A Nápoles-Springer; S F Posner; E A Sickles; E J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.