| Literature DB >> 29538324 |
Luana Romão Nogueira1, Mariane de Mello Fontanelli2, Breno Souza de Aguiar3, Marcelo Antunes Failla4, Alex Antonio Florindo5, Ligia Vizeu Barrozo6, Moisés Goldbaum7, Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar8, Maria Cecilia Goi Porto Alves9, Regina Mara Fisberg10.
Abstract
Food environment and income act as determinants of diet, and consequently, of the consumption of fruits and vegetables. The objective of this study is to investigate the association between fruit and vegetable consumption, income, and street market density in adolescents living in São Paulo, Brazil. Data from 521 adolescents (12 to 19 years) participating in the 2015 Health Survey of São Paulo were used. Buffers (500, 1000, and 1500 m) were drawn around the households and the street markets were counted in each zone. Multilevel logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between fruit and vegetable consumption, income, and street market density. The main results showed that the presence of a street market in the zone closest to the households (500 m) was associated with higher consumption of fruits and vegetables (OR: 1.73; CI 95% 1.01-3.00). Higher family income was associated with a higher consumption of fruits and vegetables for models of 500 m buffer (OR: 2.56; CI 95% 1.47-4.45), 1000 m (OR: 2.30; CI 95% 1.33-3.96), and 1500 m (OR: 2.32; CI 95% 1.35-4.00). These results support the implementation of public policies that jointly consider income and the availability of street markets or healthy food environments.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; food environment; fruits; street markets; vegetables
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29538324 PMCID: PMC5877062 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15030517
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle factors, and street markets density by fruits and vegetables consumption of adolescents living in the city of São Paulo, Brazil, 2015.
| Variables | <P75 | ≥P75 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years, | ||||
| 12–15 | 270 (51.8) | 208 (77.1) | 62 (22.9) | 0.227 |
| 16–19 | 251 (48.2) | 183 (72.9) | 68 (27.1) | |
| Sex ( | ||||
| Male | 264 (50.7) | 197 (74.6) | 67 (25.4) | 0.820 |
| Female | 257 (49.3) | 194 (75.4) | 63 (24.6) | |
| Race ( | ||||
| White | 221 (42.7) | 158 (71.5) | 63 (28.5) | 0.088 |
| Non-white | 296 (57.3) | 231 (78.0) | 65 (22.0) | |
| Family income per capita ( | ||||
| ≤1 Minimum wage | 296 (59.6) | 235 (79.4) | 61 (20.6) | 0.039 |
| >1 Minimum wage | 121 (24.3) | 82 (67.8) | 39 (32.2) | |
| No response | 80 (16.1) | |||
| Education of the household head ( | ||||
| ≤9 years | 242 (48.9) | 194 (80.2) | 48 (19.8) | 0.003 |
| 10–12 years | 157 (31.7) | 103 (65.6) | 54 (34.4) | |
| >12 years | 96 (19.4) | 76 (79.2) | 20 (20.8) | |
| Leisure physical activity ( | ||||
| Does not comply with recommendation | 418 (80.2) | 323 (77.3) | 95 (22.7) | 0.018 |
| Complies with recommendation | 103 (19.8) | 68 (66.0) | 35 (34.0) | |
| Body Mass Index ( | ||||
| Non-overweight | 355 (70.4) | 266 (74.9) | 89 (25.1) | 0.707 |
| Overweight | 149 (29.6) | 114 (76.5) | 35 (23.5) | |
| Years of residence ( | ||||
| ≤5 | 184 (35.3) | 134 (72.8) | 50 (27.2) | 0.386 |
| >5 | 337 (64.7) | 257 (76.3) | 80 (23.7) | |
| Street market density 500 m buffer | ||||
| 0 | 258 (49.5) | 198 (76.7) | 60 (23.3) | 0.055 |
| 1 | 155 (29.8) | 106 (68.4) | 49 (31.6) | |
| ≥2 | 108 (20.7) | 87 (80.6) | 21 (19.4) | |
| Street market density 1000 m buffer | ||||
| ≤1 | 124 (23.8) | 98 (79.0) | 26 (21.0) | 0.268 |
| 2–4 | 281 (53.9) | 203 (72.2) | 78 (27.8) | |
| ≥5 | 116 (22.3) | 90 (77.6) | 26 (22.4) | |
| Street market density 1500 m buffer | ||||
| ≤2 | 101 (19.4) | 84 (83.2) | 17 (16.8) | 0.093 |
| 3–7 | 232 (44.5) | 167 (72.0) | 65 (28.0) | |
| ≥8 | 188 (36.1) | 140 (74.5) | 48 (25.5) |
Source: ISA-Capital 2015. * Minimum wage value in 2015 was 224.02 USD.
Figure 1Distribution of usual consumption in grams of fruits and vegetables by adolescents. ISA-Capital, São Paulo city, Brazil, 2015. Source: 2015 ISA-Capital.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of street markets in the São Paulo city and adolescent households. ISA-Capital, São Paulo, Brazil, 2015.
Odds ratios for associations between fruits and vegetables consumption, income, and street market density in different buffers sizes. ISA-Capital, city of São Paulo, 2015.
| Variable | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|
| 500 m buffer | |
| Street market density | |
| 0 | ref |
| 1 | 1.73 (1.01–3.00) * |
| ≥2 | 0.70 (0.35–1.42) |
| Family income per capita | |
| ≤1 Minimum wage | ref |
| >1 Minimum wage | 2.56 (1.47–4.45) * |
| 1000 m buffer | |
| Street market density | |
| ≤1 | ref |
| 2–4 | 1.33 (0.70–2.53) |
| ≥5 | 0.93 (0.41–2.12) |
| Family income per capita | |
| ≤1 Minimum wage | ref |
| >1 Minimum wage | 2.30 (1.33–3.96) * |
| 1500 m buffer | |
| Street market density | |
| ≤2 | ref |
| 3–7 | 1.97 (0.96–4.04) |
| ≥8 | 1.51 (0.67–3.44) |
| Family income per capita | |
| ≤1 Minimum wage | ref |
| >1 Minimum wage | 2.32 (1.35–4.00) * |
Models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), years of residence, human development index (HDI) intramunicipal and region of São Paulo; * p < 0.05. Ref: reference category.