Gill Cowburn1, Anne Matthews1, Aiden Doherty1, Alex Hamilton1, Paul Kelly2, Julianne Williams1, Charlie Foster1, Michael Nelson3. 1. 1British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group,Nuffield Department of Population Health,University of Oxford,Old Road Campus,Headington,Oxford OX3 7LF,UK. 2. 2Physical Activity for Health Research Centre,Moray House School of Education,University of Edinburgh,Edinburgh,UK. 3. 3Public Health Nutrition Research (formerly Children's Food Trust),London,UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using wearable cameras as a method to capture the opportunities for food and drink purchasing/consumption that young people encounter on their regular journeys to and from school. DESIGN: A qualitative study using multiple data-collection methods including wearable cameras, global positioning system units, individual interviews, food and drink purchase and consumption diaries completed by participants over four days, and an audit of food outlets located within an 800 m Euclidean buffer zone around each school. SETTING: A community setting. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two students (fourteen girls and eight boys) aged 13-15 years recruited from four secondary schools in two counties of England. RESULTS: Wearable cameras offered a feasible and acceptable method for collecting food purchase and consumption data when used alongside traditional methods of data collection in a small number of teenagers. We found evidence of participants making deliberate choices about whether or not to purchase/consume food and drink on their journeys. These choices were influenced by priorities over money, friends, journey length, travel mode and ease of access to opportunities for purchase/consumption. Most food and drink items were purchased/consumed within an 800 m Euclidean buffer around school, with items commonly selected being high in energy, fat and sugar. Wearable camera images combined with interviews helped identify unreported items and misreporting errors. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable camera images prompt detailed discussion and generate contextually specific information which could offer new insights and understanding around eating behaviour patterns. The feasibility of scaling up the use of these methods requires further empirical work.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of using wearable cameras as a method to capture the opportunities for food and drink purchasing/consumption that young people encounter on their regular journeys to and from school. DESIGN: A qualitative study using multiple data-collection methods including wearable cameras, global positioning system units, individual interviews, food and drink purchase and consumption diaries completed by participants over four days, and an audit of food outlets located within an 800 m Euclidean buffer zone around each school. SETTING: A community setting. SUBJECTS: Twenty-two students (fourteen girls and eight boys) aged 13-15 years recruited from four secondary schools in two counties of England. RESULTS: Wearable cameras offered a feasible and acceptable method for collecting food purchase and consumption data when used alongside traditional methods of data collection in a small number of teenagers. We found evidence of participants making deliberate choices about whether or not to purchase/consume food and drink on their journeys. These choices were influenced by priorities over money, friends, journey length, travel mode and ease of access to opportunities for purchase/consumption. Most food and drink items were purchased/consumed within an 800 m Euclidean buffer around school, with items commonly selected being high in energy, fat and sugar. Wearable camera images combined with interviews helped identify unreported items and misreporting errors. CONCLUSIONS: Wearable camera images prompt detailed discussion and generate contextually specific information which could offer new insights and understanding around eating behaviour patterns. The feasibility of scaling up the use of these methods requires further empirical work.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescents; Food and drink purchase and consumption; Methods; School; Wearable cameras
Authors: Laurel E Meyer; Lauren Porter; Meghan E Reilly; Caroline Johnson; Salman Safir; Shelly F Greenfield; Benjamin C Silverman; James I Hudson; Kristin N Javaras Journal: Res Ethics Date: 2021-10-30
Authors: Luana Romão Nogueira; Mariane de Mello Fontanelli; Breno Souza de Aguiar; Marcelo Antunes Failla; Alex Antonio Florindo; Ligia Vizeu Barrozo; Moisés Goldbaum; Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar; Maria Cecilia Goi Porto Alves; Regina Mara Fisberg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-03-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Christina McKerchar; Moira Smith; Ryan Gage; Jonathan Williman; Gillian Abel; Cameron Lacey; Cliona Ni Mhurchu; Louise Signal Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Loma Veatupu; Viliami Puloka; Moira Smith; Christina McKerchar; Louise Signal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Paul Kelly; Emma Thomas; Aiden Doherty; Teresa Harms; Órlaith Burke; Jonathan Gershuny; Charlie Foster Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240