Literature DB >> 29529656

Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene.

Robert H Hopper1, Henry Ho, Supatra Sritulanondha, Ann C Williams, Charles A Engh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) liners used for primary THA have demonstrated lower wear rates than noncrosslinked, conventional polyethylene (CPE) liners through the first decade of clinical service. However, little high-quality evidence is currently available regarding the second decade performance of these implants and it remains uncertain whether the onset of osteolysis has simply been delayed or if the wear associated with XLPE liners will remain low enough that osteolysis will not occur. It is also unknown how the potential reductions in wear and osteolysis will influence long-term revision rates. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Do patients who underwent THA with XLPE liners demonstrate (1) a lower rate of revision for wear-related complications; (2) a reduced wear rate; and (3) a lower frequency of osteolysis compared with those with CPE liners?
METHODS: Over an 18-month period from 1999 to 2000, 226 patients who had 236 primary THAs consented to participate in a randomized controlled trial conducted at one institution. To be eligible for intraoperative randomization, patients had to be implanted with a 28-mm cobalt-chrome alloy femoral head, a 4-mm lateralized liner, and the same cup and stem design. Six patients with six THAs were excluded intraoperatively because they did not receive study components for reasons unrelated to the liner material. The remaining 230 THAs among 220 patients were randomized to XLPE liners or CPE liners. The mean age at surgery was 62 ± 11 years and there were no differences in age, gender, or body mass index among the groups. There was no differential loss to followup between the study groups; among patients not known to be deceased or having undergone revision, minimum 14-year radiographic followup is available for 85 THAs including 46 with XLPE and 39 with CPE liners. Polyethylene wear was measured radiographically using Martell's Hip Analysis Suite and areas of osteolysis were evaluated before revision or at most recent followup. Revision rates at 15 years using reoperation for any reason and revision for wear or osteolysis were calculated using cumulative incidence considering patient death as a competing risk.
RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of revision at 15 years using reoperation for wear-related complications as an endpoint was lower in the XLPE group than the CPE group (0%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0% versus 12%, 95% CI, 7%-19%; p < 0.001). Among unrevised THAs with minimum 14-year radiographic followup, the mean steady-state linear wear rate for THAs with XLPE liners was lower than the mean linear wear rate for the THAs with CPE liners (0.03 ± 0.05 versus 0.17 ± 0.09 mm/year; mean difference, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.11-0.17; p < 0.001). Osteolysis of any size was noted among 9% (four of 46) of the hips in the XLPE group and 46% (18 of 39) of the hips in the CPE group (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.07-0.51; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized study with followup into the second decade demonstrated reductions in revision, wear, and osteolysis associated with the use of XLPE. The low wear rates and absence of any mechanical failures among the XLPE liners at long-term followup affirm the durability of these components that did not incorporate antioxidants. Although osteolysis has not been eliminated, it occurs infrequently and has not caused any clinical problems to date. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29529656      PMCID: PMC6259699          DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses.

Authors:  M Endo; J L Tipper; D C Barton; M H Stone; E Ingham; J Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Wear and biological activity of highly crosslinked polyethylene in the hip under low serum protein concentrations.

Authors:  A L Galvin; J L Tipper; L M Jennings; M H Stone; Z M Jin; E Ingham; I Fisher
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles--an in vitro comparison of biologic activities.

Authors:  Richard Lynn Illgen; Todd M Forsythe; J Wesley Pike; Michel P Laurent; Cheryl R Blanchard
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  The Appropriate Variable to Compare Wear in Total Hip Prostheses: Commentary on an article by Donald W. Howie, MBBS, FRACS, PhD, et al.: "The Wear Rate of Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Hip Replacement Is Not Increased by Large Articulations. A Randomized Controlled Trial".

Authors:  Albert H Burstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The John Charnley Award: Highly crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty decreases long-term wear: a double-blind randomized trial.

Authors:  Siôn Glyn-Jones; Geraint E R Thomas; Patrick Garfjeld-Roberts; Roger Gundle; Adrian Taylor; Peter McLardy-Smith; David W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Clinical performance of a Durasul highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years.

Authors:  Lawrence D Dorr; Zhinian Wan; Cambize Shahrdar; Leighellen Sirianni; Myriam Boutary; Andrew Yun
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study.

Authors:  Carel H Geerdink; Bernd Grimm; Rama Ramakrishnan; Jorco Rondhuis; Aart J Verburg; Alphons J Tonino
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Can component and patient factors account for the variance in wear rates among bilateral total hip arthroplasty patients?

Authors:  Karl F Orishimo; Christi J Sychterz; Robert H Hopper; Charles A Engh
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The Relationship Between Polyethylene Wear and Periprosthetic Osteolysis in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 12 Years in a Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort.

Authors:  John A J Broomfield; Tamer T Malak; Geraint E R Thomas; Antony J R Palmer; Adrian Taylor; Sion Glyn-Jones
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandra M Claus; C Anderson Engh; Christi J Sychterz; John S Xenos; Karl F Orishimo; Charles A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  [Total hip arthroplasty in young patients : Bearings and custom-made prostheses].

Authors:  C Benignus; M Morlock; J Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Editorial Comment: 2017 Hip Society Proceedings.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Polyethylene Wear Increases in Liners Articulating With Scratched Oxidized Zirconium Femoral Heads.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Have Negligible Wear at 10 Years: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.

Authors:  David G Campbell; Stuart A Callary
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  CORR Insights®: Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Have Negligible Wear at 10 Years: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  A higher degree of polyethylene irradiation is associated with a reduced risk of revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasties using cemented acetabular components: an analysis of 290,770 cases from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Island and the Isle of Man.

Authors:  Edward T Davis; Joseph Pagkalos; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.

Authors:  Stuart B Goodman; Jiri Gallo; Emmanuel Gibon; Michiaki Takagi
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  The 2018 Otto Aufranc Award: How Does Genome-wide Variation Affect Osteolysis Risk After THA?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas; Anne Marie Fenstad; Karan Shah; Lorraine Southam; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Geir Hallan; Hårvard Dale; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Ove Furnes; Eleftheria Zeggini; J Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Recent update on crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 10.  Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (34,020 Patients): What Have We Learnt?

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Simon R Platt; Tim N Board; Martyn L Porter
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.