Literature DB >> 12629604

Can component and patient factors account for the variance in wear rates among bilateral total hip arthroplasty patients?

Karl F Orishimo1, Christi J Sychterz, Robert H Hopper, Charles A Engh.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to indirectly quantify the effect of patient and component factors on polyethylene wear in patients with bilateral hip arthroplasties. Assuming that both hips experience similar levels of activity, the confounding influence of activity on wear can be removed by comparing wear rates within subjects. We studied temporal wear patterns in 21 patients with bilateral hip arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 102 months. Each patient had matching acetabular cup and femoral head components implanted in both hips. Regression analyses were used to assess the variation in wear rates between the first and second implanted hips. The r(2) value demonstrated that matched components and patient factors accounted for 61% of the variance in wear rates. The remaining 39% of the variance, which is unaccounted for, indicates that factors other than those related to the components and patient also play a role. Copyright 2003, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12629604     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2003.50023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Risk factors for accelerated polyethylene wear and osteolysis in ABG I total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jiri Gallo; Vitezslav Havranek; Jana Zapletalova
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effects of episodic subluxation events on third body ingress and embedment in the THA bearing surface.

Authors:  Anneliese D Heiner; Hannah J Lundberg; Thomas E Baer; Douglas R Pedersen; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Otto Aufranc Award: Crosslinking Reduces THA Wear, Osteolysis, and Revision Rates at 15-year Followup Compared With Noncrosslinked Polyethylene.

Authors:  Robert H Hopper; Henry Ho; Supatra Sritulanondha; Ann C Williams; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.

Authors:  Robin Pourzal; Christopher B Knowlton; Deborah J Hall; Michel P Laurent; Robert M Urban; Markus A Wimmer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Analysis of polyethylene wear in plain radiographs.

Authors:  Maiken Stilling; Kjeld Søballe; Niels Trolle Andersen; Kristian Larsen; Ole Rahbek
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Sliding direction dependence of polyethylene wear for metal counterface traverse of severe scratches.

Authors:  Liam P Glennon; Thomas E Baer; James A Martin; William D Lack; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Average 22-Year Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Harris-Galante Prosthesis in Patients under 50 Years.

Authors:  Heejae Won; Seung-Hoon Baek; Junekyu Kim; Won Kee Lee; Yeon Soo Lee; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-03-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.