| Literature DB >> 29513673 |
João Paulo Gomes Viana1, Marcos Vinícius Bohrer Monteiro Siqueira2, Fabiano Lucas Araujo3, Carolina Grando1, Patricia Sanae Sujii1, Ellida de Aguiar Silvestre1, Mariana Novello1, José Baldin Pinheiro4, Marcelo Mattos Cavallari5, Pedro H S Brancalion6, Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues7, Anete Pereira de Souza8, Julian Catchen9, Maria I Zucchi10.
Abstract
The primary focus of tropical forest restoration has been the recovery of forest structure and tree taxonomic diversity, with limited attention given to genetic conservation. Populations reintroduced through restoration plantings may have low genetic diversity and be genetically structured due to founder effects and genetic drift, which limit the potential of restoration to recover ecologically resilient plant communities. Here, we studied the genetic diversity, genetic structure and differentiation using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) markers between restored and natural populations of the native tree Casearia sylvestris in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. We sampled leaves from approximately 24 adult individuals in each of the study sites: two restoration plantations (27 and 62 years old) and two forest remnants. We prepared and sequenced a genotyping-by-sequencing library, SNP markers were identified de novo using Stacks pipeline, and genetic parameters and structure analyses were then estimated for populations. The sequencing step was successful for 80 sampled individuals. Neutral genetic diversity was similar among restored and natural populations (AR = 1.72 ± 0.005; HO = 0.135 ± 0.005; HE = 0.167 ± 0.005; FIS = 0.16 ± 0.022), which were not genetically structured by population subdivision. In spite of this absence of genetic structure by population we found genetic structure within populations but even so there is not spatial genetic structure in any population studied. Less than 1% of the neutral alleles were exclusive to a population. In general, contrary to our expectations, restoration plantations were then effective for conserving tree genetic diversity in human-modified tropical landscapes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that genotyping-by-sequencing can be a useful tool in restoration genetics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29513673 PMCID: PMC5841640 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Genetic diversity parameters for Casearia sylvestris populations in natural remnants and restoration plantations in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil.
| Pop. | N | A | P | HO | HE | FIS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 22 | 1217 | 2 | 0.13 (0.13–0.14) | 0.17 (0.16–0.17) | 0.19 (0.15–0.23) |
| IR | 18 | 1213 | 1 | 0.14 (0.13–0.16) | 0.17 (0.15–0.17) | 0.15 (0.10–0.19) |
| SG | 21 | 1223 | 4 | 0.14 (0.13–0.15) | 0.17 (0.15–0.17) | 0.14 (0.10–0.18) |
| TT | 19 | 1216 | 2 | 0.13 (0.12–0.15) | 0.16 (0.15–0.17) | 0.17 (0.12–0.22) |
CO–Forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Natural remnant in Campinas, SP; TT—Natural remnant in Tietê, SP. n–Sample size; A–Number of different alleles; P–Number of private alleles; HO−Observed heterozygosity; HE−Expected heterozygosity; FIS−Within population fixation index.
Fig 1Venn diagram showing the number of shared alleles among groups of Casearia sylvestis populations from restoration plantations and natural remnants in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil.
Seventy-nine percent of all alleles were found in all populations. CO–Samples from forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Samples from forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Samples from natural forest in Campinas, SP; TT–Samples from natural forest in Tietê, SP. Different colors represent each of the four studied populations.
Pairwise Nei’s FST value (upper triangular. FST value were not significantly different from zero based on 95% confidence intervals calculated from 1000 bootstrap resamplings.
| CO | IR | SG | TT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | - | -0.0006 | 0.0011 | 0.0004 |
| IR | - | - | 0.0020 | -0.0004 |
| SG | - | - | - | 0.0008 |
| TT | - | - | - | - |
CO–Forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Natural remnant in Campinas, SP; TT—Natural remnant in Tietê, SP.
Fig 2Scatterplot from DAPC showing the two discriminant functions for Casearia sylvestis populations from restoration plantations and natural remnants in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil.
Different symbols represent populations from four studied forest fragments. Different colors represent tree different clusters found using BIC of DAPC. These clusters were built with samples from all pre-defined populations, indicating that genetic structure was not based on population subdivision. CO–Samples from forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Samples from forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Samples from natural forest in Campinas, SP; TT–Samples from natural forest in Tietê, SP.
Fig 3Bar plot of membership probability from Discriminant Analysis of Principal Components for Casearia sylvestis populations from restoration plantations and natural remnants in the Atlantic Forest of southeastern Brazil.
Different colors represent tree different clusters found using BIC of DAPC. Each clusters is composed of samples from all pre-defined populations; thus, the genetic structure was not based on population subdivision. CO–Samples from forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Samples from forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Samples from natural forest in Campinas, SP; TT–Samples from natural forest in Tietê, SP.
Estimates of fine-scale spatial genetic structure for all C. sylvestris populations.
| Pop. | βlog | P-value (βlog) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 0.0038 | 0.1968 | 0.0646 | -0.0041 |
| IR | 0.0007 | 0.8641 | 0.0144 | -0.0007 |
| SG | -0.0016 | 0.5165 | -0.0065 | 0.0015 |
| TT | -0.0025 | 0.4026 | -0.0035 | 0.0025 |
βlog−Regression slope of kinship coefficient on log of spatial distance; F –Kinship coefficient for the first distance class; Sp—Vekemans and Hardy’s (2004) estimator of fine-scale SGS intensity. CO–Forest restoration in Cosmópolis, SP; IR–Forest restoration in Iracemápolis, SP; SG–Natural remnant in Campinas, SP; TT—Natural remnant in Tietê, SP.