BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Species delimitation can be problematic, and recently diverged taxa are sometimes viewed as the extremes of a species' continuum in response to environmental conditions. Using population genetic approaches, this study assessed the relationship between two Casearia sylvestris (Salicaceae) varieties, which occur sympatrically and allopatrically in the landscape of south-east Brazil, where intermediate types are also found. METHODS: In total, 376 individuals from nine populations in four different ecosystems were sampled, and nine microsatellite markers were used to assess the relative effects of the ecosystems and varieties on the distribution of genetic diversity among populations of this species. KEY RESULTS: As a by-product of this study, several PCR products with more than two alleles were observed. The possibility that extra bands represent non-specific amplification or PCR artefacts was discarded by sequencing a sample of these bands. We suggest that (partial) genome duplication in C. sylvestris most probably explains this phenomenon, which may be a key factor in the differentiation of the two taxa, as it was markedly more frequent in one of the varieties. AMOVA indicated that approx. 22 % of the total genetic diversity was found between the two varieties. Bayesian analysis identified varieties and ecosystems as evolutionary units, rather than the individual populations sampled. CONCLUSIONS: The results are in agreement with field observations and support the recognition of two varieties, as well as documenting the occurrence of hybridization between them.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Species delimitation can be problematic, and recently diverged taxa are sometimes viewed as the extremes of a species' continuum in response to environmental conditions. Using population genetic approaches, this study assessed the relationship between two Casearia sylvestris (Salicaceae) varieties, which occur sympatrically and allopatrically in the landscape of south-east Brazil, where intermediate types are also found. METHODS: In total, 376 individuals from nine populations in four different ecosystems were sampled, and nine microsatellite markers were used to assess the relative effects of the ecosystems and varieties on the distribution of genetic diversity among populations of this species. KEY RESULTS: As a by-product of this study, several PCR products with more than two alleles were observed. The possibility that extra bands represent non-specific amplification or PCR artefacts was discarded by sequencing a sample of these bands. We suggest that (partial) genome duplication in C. sylvestris most probably explains this phenomenon, which may be a key factor in the differentiation of the two taxa, as it was markedly more frequent in one of the varieties. AMOVA indicated that approx. 22 % of the total genetic diversity was found between the two varieties. Bayesian analysis identified varieties and ecosystems as evolutionary units, rather than the individual populations sampled. CONCLUSIONS: The results are in agreement with field observations and support the recognition of two varieties, as well as documenting the occurrence of hybridization between them.
Authors: M T Cervera; V Storme; B Ivens; J Gusmão; B H Liu; V Hostyn; J Van Slycken; M Van Montagu; W Boerjan Journal: Genetics Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Liying Cui; P Kerr Wall; James H Leebens-Mack; Bruce G Lindsay; Douglas E Soltis; Jeff J Doyle; Pamela S Soltis; John E Carlson; Kathiravetpilla Arumuganathan; Abdelali Barakat; Victor A Albert; Hong Ma; Claude W dePamphilis Journal: Genome Res Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: André Carneiro Muniz; José Pires Lemos-Filho; Helena Augusta Souza; Rafaela Cabral Marinho; Renata Santiago Buzatti; Myriam Heuertz; Maria Bernadete Lovato Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: João Paulo Gomes Viana; Marcos Vinícius Bohrer Monteiro Siqueira; Fabiano Lucas Araujo; Carolina Grando; Patricia Sanae Sujii; Ellida de Aguiar Silvestre; Mariana Novello; José Baldin Pinheiro; Marcelo Mattos Cavallari; Pedro H S Brancalion; Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues; Anete Pereira de Souza; Julian Catchen; Maria I Zucchi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: André Carneiro Muniz; Ricardo José Gonzaga Pimenta; Mariana Vargas Cruz; Jacqueline Gomes Rodrigues; Renata Santiago de Oliveira Buzatti; Myriam Heuertz; José P Lemos-Filho; Maria Bernadete Lovato Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 2.912