Literature DB >> 31615374

How well do revegetation plantings capture genetic diversity?

Rebecca Jordan1, Martin F Breed2,3, Suzanne M Prober4, Adam D Miller5,6, Ary A Hoffmann7.   

Abstract

Revegetation plantings are a key management tool for ecological restoration. Revegetation success is usually measured using ecological traits, however, genetic diversity should also be considered as it can influence fitness, adaptive capacity and long-term viability of revegetation plantings and ecosystem functioning. Here we review the global literature comparing genetic diversity in revegetation plantings to natural stands. Findings from 48 studies suggest variable genetic outcomes of revegetation, with 46% demonstrating higher genetic diversity in revegetation than natural stands and 52% demonstrating lower diversity. Levels of genetic diversity were most strongly associated with the number of source sites used-where information was available, 69% of studies showing higher genetic diversity in revegetation reported using multiple provenances, compared with only 33% for those with lower diversity. However, with a few exceptions, it was unclear whether differences in genetic diversity between revegetation and natural stands were statistically significant. This reflected insufficient reporting of statistical error and metadata within the published studies, which limited conclusions about factors contributing to patterns. Nonetheless, our findings indicate that mixed seed sourcing can contribute to higher genetic diversity in revegetation. Finally, we emphasize the type of metadata needed to determine factors influencing genetic diversity in revegetation and inform restoration efforts.

Keywords:  ecological restoration; genetic diversity; heterozygosity; industry practices; provenancing; seed sourcing

Year:  2019        PMID: 31615374      PMCID: PMC6832181          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  20 in total

1.  Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity.

Authors:  Thorsten B H Reusch; Anneli Ehlers; August Hämmerli; Boris Worm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals.

Authors:  M Nei
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Ecological consequences of genetic diversity.

Authors:  A Randall Hughes; Brian D Inouye; Marc T J Johnson; Nora Underwood; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 4.  Revisiting Adaptive Potential, Population Size, and Conservation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò; Torsten N Kristensen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  New insights into adaptation and population structure of cork oak using genotyping by sequencing.

Authors:  Francisco Pina-Martins; João Baptista; Georgios Pappas; Octávio S Paulo
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Population genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Markert; Denise M Champlin; Ruth Gutjahr-Gobell; Jason S Grear; Anne Kuhn; Thomas J McGreevy; Annette Roth; Mark J Bagley; Diane E Nacci
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Landscape genomics reveals altered genome wide diversity within revegetated stands of Eucalyptus microcarpa (Grey Box).

Authors:  Rebecca Jordan; Shannon K Dillon; Suzanne M Prober; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  Mating system and early viability resistance to habitat fragmentation in a bird-pollinated eucalypt.

Authors:  M F Breed; K M Ottewell; M G Gardner; M H K Marklund; M G Stead; J B C Harris; A J Lowe
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change.

Authors:  Carla M Sgrò; Andrew J Lowe; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 10.  Time to get moving: assisted gene flow of forest trees.

Authors:  Sally N Aitken; Jordan B Bemmels
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.183

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Opportunities and challenges of macrogenetic studies.

Authors:  Deborah M Leigh; Charles B van Rees; Katie L Millette; Martin F Breed; Chloé Schmidt; Laura D Bertola; Brian K Hand; Margaret E Hunter; Evelyn L Jensen; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Gordon Luikart; Stéphanie Manel; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Gernot Segelbacher; Sean Hoban; Ivan Paz-Vinas
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Chloroplast and Nuclear Genetic Diversity Explain the Limited Distribution of Endangered and Endemic Thuja sutchuenensis in China.

Authors:  Zhi Yao; Xinyu Wang; Kailai Wang; Wenhao Yu; Purong Deng; Jinyi Dong; Yonghua Li; Kaifeng Cui; Yongbo Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 3.  Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition.

Authors:  Sean Hoban; Frederick I Archer; Laura D Bertola; Jason G Bragg; Martin F Breed; Michael W Bruford; Melinda A Coleman; Robert Ekblom; W Chris Funk; Catherine E Grueber; Brian K Hand; Rodolfo Jaffé; Evelyn Jensen; Jeremy S Johnson; Francine Kershaw; Libby Liggins; Anna J MacDonald; Joachim Mergeay; Joshua M Miller; Frank Muller-Karger; David O'Brien; Ivan Paz-Vinas; Kevin M Potter; Orly Razgour; Cristiano Vernesi; Margaret E Hunter
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-04-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.