Literature DB >> 24121776

Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation.

Armando Caballero1, Aurora García-Dorado.   

Abstract

Genetic variation is usually estimated empirically from statistics based on population gene frequencies, but alternative statistics based on allelic diversity (number of allelic types) can provide complementary information. There is a lack of knowledge, however, on the evolutionary implications attached to allelic-diversity measures, particularly in structured populations. In this article we simulated multiple scenarios of single and structured populations in which a quantitative trait subject to stabilizing selection is adapted to different fitness optima. By forcing a global change in the optima we evaluated which diversity variables are more strongly correlated with both short- and long-term adaptation to the new optima. We found that quantitative genetic variance components for the trait and gene-frequency-diversity measures are generally more strongly correlated with short-term response to selection, whereas allelic-diversity measures are more correlated with long-term and total response to selection. Thus, allelic-diversity variables are better predictors of long-term adaptation than gene-frequency variables. This observation is also extended to unlinked neutral markers as a result of the information they convey on the demographic population history. Diffusion approximations for the allelic-diversity measures in a finite island model under the infinite-allele neutral mutation model are also provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diffusion approximations; gene diversity; heterozygosity; number of alleles; response to selection; selection limits

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24121776      PMCID: PMC3832279          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.158410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  THE NUMBER OF ALLELES THAT CAN BE MAINTAINED IN A FINITE POPULATION.

Authors:  M KIMURA; J F CROW
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1964-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  G(ST) is still a useful measure of genetic differentiation - a comment on Jost's D.

Authors:  Nils Ryman; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco.

Authors:  A El Mousadik; R J Petit
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  Relationship between three measures of genetic differentiation G(ST), D(EST) and G'(ST): how wrong have we been?

Authors:  R Heller; H R Siegismund
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  The Sampling Theory of Neutral Alleles in an Island Population of Fluctuating Size

Authors: 
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Measuring population differentiation using GST or D? A simulation study with microsatellite DNA markers under a finite island model and nonequilibrium conditions.

Authors:  Liang Leng; D E-Xing Zhang
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Evolution of migration in a periodically changing environment.

Authors:  F Blanquart; S Gandon
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  DNA polymorphism in a subdivided population: the expected number of segregating sites in the two-subpopulation model.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population.

Authors:  N H Barton; M Slatkin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  The founder effect and response to artificial selection.

Authors:  J W James
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  22 in total

1.  Allelic richness following population founding events--a stochastic modeling framework incorporating gene flow and genetic drift.

Authors:  Gili Greenbaum; Alan R Templeton; Yair Zarmi; Shirli Bar-David
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Highly diverse and highly successful: invasive Australian acacias have not experienced genetic bottlenecks globally.

Authors:  Sara Vicente; Cristina Máguas; David M Richardson; Helena Trindade; John R U Wilson; Johannes J Le Roux
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Genetic Variability and Structuring of Arctic Charr (Salvelinus alpinus) Populations in Northern Fennoscandia.

Authors:  Takahito Shikano; Antero Järvinen; Paula Marjamäki; Kimmo K Kahilainen; Juha Merilä
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Conservation genetics of threatened Hippocampus guttulatus in vulnerable habitats in NW Spain: temporal and spatial stability of wild populations with flexible polygamous mating system in captivity.

Authors:  Almudena López; Manuel Vera; Miquel Planas; Carmen Bouza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using genomics to characterize evolutionary potential for conservation of wild populations.

Authors:  Katherine A Harrisson; Alexandra Pavlova; Marina Telonis-Scott; Paul Sunnucks
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Genetic Structure in the Northern Range Margins of Common Ash, Fraxinus excelsior L.

Authors:  Mari Mette Tollefsrud; Tor Myking; Jørn Henrik Sønstebø; Vaidotas Lygis; Ari Mikko Hietala; Myriam Heuertz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Phylogeography and Conservation Genetics of the Ibero-Balearic Three-Spined Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Marta Vila; Miguel Hermida; Carlos Fernández; Silvia Perea; Ignacio Doadrio; Rafaela Amaro; Eduardo San Miguel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Genetic diversity and sex-bias dispersal of plateau pika in Tibetan plateau.

Authors:  Liangzhi Zhang; Jiapeng Qu; Kexin Li; Wenjing Li; Min Yang; Yanming Zhang
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Post-genotyping optimization of dataset formation could affect genetic diversity parameters: an example of analyses with alpine goat breeds.

Authors:  Neža Pogorevc; Mojca Simčič; Negar Khayatzadeh; Johann Sölkner; Beate Berger; Danijela Bojkovski; Minja Zorc; Peter Dovč; Ivica Medugorac; Simon Horvat
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Understanding crop genetic diversity under modern plant breeding.

Authors:  Yong-Bi Fu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.