Literature DB >> 29506866

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ang Li1, David A Garcia2, Gary H Lyman3, Marc Carrier4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear if direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective and safe alternatives to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWHs) for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aim to synthesize existing literature that compared DOACs versus LMWHs in this high-risk population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review using EMBASE, MEDLINE and CENTRAL for all observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (PROSPERO: CRD42017080898). Two authors independently reviewed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed bias. Primary outcomes included 6-month recurrent VTE and major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) and mortality.
RESULTS: We screened 426 articles, reviewed 25 in full-text, and selected 13 and 2 for qualitative and quantitative synthesis, respectively. Based on a meta-analysis of the 2 RCTs, DOACs had lower 6-month recurrent VTE (42/725) when compared to LMWH (64/727) (RR: 0.65 (0.42-1.01)). However, DOACs had higher major bleeding (40/725) when compared to LMWH (23/727) (RR 1.74 (1.05-2.88)). Similarly, CRNMB was higher (RR 2.31 (0.85-6.28)) for patients receiving DOACs. There was no difference in mortality (RR 1.03 (0.85-1.26)). Observational studies were heterogeneous with high risks of bias but showed recurrent VTE rates consistent with the meta-analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: DOACs were more effective than LMWHs to prevent recurrent VTE but were associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding as well as a trend toward more CRNMB. The absolute risk differences were small (2-3%) for both primary outcomes and may reflect better compliance with DOACs than LMWHs.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Factor Xa inhibitors; Heparin; Low-molecular-weight; Neoplasms; Venous thrombosis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29506866      PMCID: PMC6119655          DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.02.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  21 in total

1.  Retrospective comparison of low molecular weight heparin vs. warfarin vs. oral Xa inhibitors for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in oncology patients: The Re-CLOT study.

Authors:  Saeed K Alzghari; Susan E Seago; Jessica E Garza; Yasmeen F Hashimie; Kimberly A Baty; Martha F Evans; Courtney Shaver; Jon D Herrington
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 1.809

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy for the treatment of acute cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marc Carrier; Chris Cameron; Aurélien Delluc; Lana Castellucci; Alok A Khorana; Agnes Y Y Lee
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 3.  International clinical practice guidelines including guidance for direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Dominique Farge; Henri Bounameaux; Benjamin Brenner; Francis Cajfinger; Philippe Debourdeau; Alok A Khorana; Ingrid Pabinger; Susan Solymoss; James Douketis; Ajay Kakkar
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus conventional anticoagulation for the treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Jeremy A Ross; Marilyn M Miller; Cristhiam M Rojas Hernandez
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

6.  Tinzaparin vs Warfarin for Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Active Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Agnes Y Y Lee; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Guy Meyer; Rupert Bauersachs; Mette S Janas; Mikala F Jarner; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of anticoagulants.

Authors:  Florian Posch; Oliver Königsbrügge; Christoph Zielinski; Ingrid Pabinger; Cihan Ay
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.944

8.  Evaluation of rivaroxaban use in patients with gynecologic malignancies at an academic medical center: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jessie R Signorelli; Arpita S Gandhi
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.809

9.  Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Gary E Raskob; Nick van Es; Peter Verhamme; Marc Carrier; Marcello Di Nisio; David Garcia; Michael A Grosso; Ajay K Kakkar; Michael J Kovacs; Michele F Mercuri; Guy Meyer; Annelise Segers; Minggao Shi; Tzu-Fei Wang; Erik Yeo; George Zhang; Jeffrey I Zwicker; Jeffrey I Weitz; Harry R Büller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.

Authors:  Jonathan Ac Sterne; Miguel A Hernán; Barnaby C Reeves; Jelena Savović; Nancy D Berkman; Meera Viswanathan; David Henry; Douglas G Altman; Mohammed T Ansari; Isabelle Boutron; James R Carpenter; An-Wen Chan; Rachel Churchill; Jonathan J Deeks; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Jamie Kirkham; Peter Jüni; Yoon K Loke; Theresa D Pigott; Craig R Ramsay; Deborah Regidor; Hannah R Rothstein; Lakhbir Sandhu; Pasqualina L Santaguida; Holger J Schünemann; Beverly Shea; Ian Shrier; Peter Tugwell; Lucy Turner; Jeffrey C Valentine; Hugh Waddington; Elizabeth Waters; George A Wells; Penny F Whiting; Julian Pt Higgins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-10-12
View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Venous Thromboembolism Treatment and Prevention in Cancer Patients: Can We Use Pills Yet?

Authors:  Tulsi Patel; David A Iglesias
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 2.  Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

3.  SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

Authors:  A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Direct oral anticoagulants in gastrointestinal malignancies: is the convenience worth the risk?

Authors:  Namisha Thapa; Joseph Shatzel; Thomas G Deloughery; Sven R Olson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

5.  CORR Insights®: High Risk of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism After Surgery for Spine Metastatic Bone Lesions: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Cost effectiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in the United States.

Authors:  Ang Li; Poorni M Manohar; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Lotte M Steuten
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 7.  Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: an update.

Authors:  A Franco-Moreno; L Cabezón-Gutiérrez; M Palka-Kotlowsa; M Villamayor-Delgado; M García-Navarro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  [Drug-induced gastrointestinal bleeding].

Authors:  W Fischbach
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) as an Alternative Treatment Option in Tumor-Related Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Robert Klamroth; Stephan Kreher; Florian Langer; Axel Matzdorff; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Home vs hospital treatment of low-risk venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rasha Khatib; Stephanie Ross; Sean Alexander Kennedy; Ivan D Florez; Thomas L Ortel; Robby Nieuwlaat; Ignacio Neumann; Daniel M Witt; Sam Schulman; Veena Manja; Rebecca Beyth; Nathan P Clark; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger J Schünemann; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.