Literature DB >> 29231094

Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Gary E Raskob1, Nick van Es1, Peter Verhamme1, Marc Carrier1, Marcello Di Nisio1, David Garcia1, Michael A Grosso1, Ajay K Kakkar1, Michael J Kovacs1, Michele F Mercuri1, Guy Meyer1, Annelise Segers1, Minggao Shi1, Tzu-Fei Wang1, Erik Yeo1, George Zhang1, Jeffrey I Zwicker1, Jeffrey I Weitz1, Harry R Büller1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-molecular-weight heparin is the standard treatment for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. The role of treatment with direct oral anticoagulant agents is unclear.
METHODS: In this open-label, noninferiority trial, we randomly assigned patients with cancer who had acute symptomatic or incidental venous thromboembolism to receive either low-molecular-weight heparin for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban at a dose of 60 mg once daily (edoxaban group) or subcutaneous dalteparin at a dose of 200 IU per kilogram of body weight once daily for 1 month followed by dalteparin at a dose of 150 IU per kilogram once daily (dalteparin group). Treatment was given for at least 6 months and up to 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding during the 12 months after randomization, regardless of treatment duration.
RESULTS: Of the 1050 patients who underwent randomization, 1046 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 67 of the 522 patients (12.8%) in the edoxaban group as compared with 71 of the 524 patients (13.5%) in the dalteparin group (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.36; P=0.006 for noninferiority; P=0.87 for superiority). Recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in 41 patients (7.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 59 patients (11.3%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, -3.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -7.0 to 0.2). Major bleeding occurred in 36 patients (6.9%) in the edoxaban group and in 21 patients (4.0%) in the dalteparin group (difference in risk, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.1 to 5.6).
CONCLUSIONS: Oral edoxaban was noninferior to subcutaneous dalteparin with respect to the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism was lower but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban than with dalteparin. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; Hokusai VTE Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073682 .).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29231094     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  299 in total

1.  Successful Treatment of Recurrent Thrombosis Associated with Malignancy with Apixaban and Follow-up for 1 Year.

Authors:  Timothy Boey; Ashita Ashish Sule; Ashish Anil Sule
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-08-07

Review 2.  Venous Thromboembolism Treatment and Prevention in Cancer Patients: Can We Use Pills Yet?

Authors:  Tulsi Patel; David A Iglesias
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

Review 3.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Breadth of complications of long-term oral anticoagulant care.

Authors:  Walter Ageno; Marco Donadini
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 5.  Anticoagulating patients with high-risk acquired thrombophilias.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2018-11-30

6.  SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

Authors:  A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Vascular Toxicity in Patients with Cancer: Is There a Recipe to Clarify Treatment? CME.

Authors:  Jose Alvarez-Cardona; Joshua Mitchell; Daniel Lenihan
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Oral Anticoagulation.

Authors:  Ertunc Altiok; Nikolaus Marx
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22

10.  Myeloid cell-synthesized coagulation factor X dampens antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Claudine Graf; Petra Wilgenbus; Sven Pagel; Jennifer Pott; Federico Marini; Sabine Reyda; Maki Kitano; Stephan Macher-Göppinger; Hartmut Weiler; Wolfram Ruf
Journal:  Sci Immunol       Date:  2019-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.