Literature DB >> 28714376

Retrospective comparison of low molecular weight heparin vs. warfarin vs. oral Xa inhibitors for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in oncology patients: The Re-CLOT study.

Saeed K Alzghari1, Susan E Seago2, Jessica E Garza2, Yasmeen F Hashimie2, Kimberly A Baty1, Martha F Evans3, Courtney Shaver4, Jon D Herrington1,3,5.   

Abstract

Background There is increasing evidence indicating oral factor Xa inhibitors can be used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism. Studies are needed to compare oral factor Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, and warfarin in the oncology population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients utilizing oral Xa inhibitors, low molecular weight heparins, or warfarin. Methods Using retrospectively collected data, we compared the recurrent venous thromboembolism incidence in oncology patients taking rivaroxaban/apixaban, enoxaparin, or warfarin with at least three months of follow-up. Patients were included if they had an active cancer, venous thromboembolism, and taking warfarin, enoxaparin, or rivaroxaban/apixaban. The primary endpoint was the first episode of recurrent venous thromboembolism at three months. Secondary endpoints included recurrent venous thromboembolism after six months, major bleeding, and mortality. Results Of 127 venous thromboembolism patients, 48 received rivaroxaban or apixaban, 23 received enoxaparin, and 56 received warfarin. The three most common cancer diagnoses were lung (21%), colorectal (14%), and breast (14%). There was no difference in venous thromboembolism recurrence at three months between the rivaroxaban/apixaban (0%), warfarin (3.6%), and the enoxaparin cohorts (4.4%) (p = 0.8319). Major bleeding at three months was only seen in one patient in the enoxaparin arm (4.2%). Mortality at three months was 0%, 3.6%, and 17.4% in the rivaroxaban/apixaban, warfarin, and enoxaparin cohorts, respectively. Conclusion The results of this retrospective study suggest that oral factor Xa inhibitors are potential options for cancer patients with venous thromboembolism. However, randomized, controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Venous thromboembolism; apixaban; enoxaparin; rivaroxaban; warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28714376     DOI: 10.1177/1078155217718382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  11 in total

1.  Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ang Li; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 2.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: New Insights from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez; Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in the age of direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  C Ay; J Beyer-Westendorf; I Pabinger
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Authors:  Xiaojun Song; Zhili Liu; Rong Zeng; Jiang Shao; Bao Liu; Yuehong Zheng; Changwei Liu; Wei Ye
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Comparison Between Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin in Asian Individuals With Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Dong-Yi Chen; Chi-Nan Tseng; Ming-Jer Hsieh; Wen-Ching Lan; Cheng-Keng Chuang; See-Tong Pang; Shao-Wei Chen; Tien-Hsing Chen; Shang-Hung Chang; I-Chang Hsieh; Pao-Hsien Chu; Ming-Shien Wen; Jen-Shi Chen; John Wen-Cheng Chang; Lai-Chu See; Wen-Kuan Huang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-02-01

7.  Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Yi-Dan Yan; Sheng-Yan Yang; Long Shen; Ling-Cong Kong; Chi Zhang; An-Hua Wei; Zheng Li; Xin-Hua Wang; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

Review 8.  Hypertension in malignancy-an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  Jolanta Małyszko; Maciej Małyszko; Leszek Kozlowski; Klaudia Kozlowska; Jacek Małyszko
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-17

9.  Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiali Xing; Xiangbao Yin; Desheng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: current evidence.

Authors:  I García-Escobar; E Brozos-Vázquez; D Gutierrez Abad; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón; A J Muñoz Martín
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 3.405

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.