Literature DB >> 28064037

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus conventional anticoagulation for the treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism: A retrospective analysis.

Jeremy A Ross1, Marilyn M Miller2, Cristhiam M Rojas Hernandez2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The standard of care for the treatment of cancer-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) formulation. The recent development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and their approval for the treatment of VTE has resulted in several new options for treatment. If equivalent to LMWH in terms of safety and effectiveness, the use of DOACs in the treatment of cancer-related VTE would reduce the risk of VTE recurrence while potentially improving the quality of life of many cancer patients.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with cancer-related VTE treated in our benign hematology clinic. Among the 153 patients included in our final analysis, 123 (80%) were treated with LMWH and 30 (20%) were treated with DOACs. Patients had 36 different histological types of cancer. The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence of VTE evaluated at 6 and 12months after the initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes were the rate of anticoagulant-associated clinically relevant bleeding and event-free survival for VTE recurrence.
RESULTS: In comparing the 2 treatment groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative rates of VTE recurrence at 6 and 12months or in the rates of major or non-major bleeding at both 6 and 12months. The median VTE recurrence-free survival rates were not reached and they were not statistically different.
CONCLUSION: DOACs appear to be as safe and effective as conventional therapy for the treatment of cancer-related VTE. Results of ongoing randomized clinical studies may provide definitive evidence and clarify the role of the DOACs in the setting of malignancy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28064037     DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Res        ISSN: 0049-3848            Impact factor:   3.944


  17 in total

Review 1.  Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Cancer: Practical Considerations for the Management of Patients with Nausea or Vomiting.

Authors:  Hanno Riess; Cihan Ay; Rupert Bauersachs; Cecilia Becattini; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Francis Cajfinger; Ian Chau; Alexander T Cohen; Alok A Khorana; Anthony Maraveyas; Marcos Renni; Annie M Young
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-04-12

Review 2.  The role of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer-related venous thromboembolism: a perspective beyond the guidelines.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: a Summary of Pitfalls to Avoid.

Authors:  Harsh K Patel; Alok A Khorana
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 4.  Evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: an update.

Authors:  A Franco-Moreno; L Cabezón-Gutiérrez; M Palka-Kotlowsa; M Villamayor-Delgado; M García-Navarro
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ang Li; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 6.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: New Insights from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez; Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Gastrointestinal Malignancies and Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Clinical Significance and Endovascular Interventions.

Authors:  Xin Li; Sasan Partovi; Sameer Gadani; Charles Martin; Avi Beck; Suresh Vedantham
Journal:  Dig Dis Interv       Date:  2020-09-22

9.  Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) as an Alternative Treatment Option in Tumor-Related Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Robert Klamroth; Stephan Kreher; Florian Langer; Axel Matzdorff; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban compared with low-molecular-weight heparin in cancer-associated thromboembolism.

Authors:  Olivia S Costa; Christine G Kohn; Nicole M Kuderer; Gary H Lyman; Thomas J Bunz; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.