Literature DB >> 29157146

Evaluation of rivaroxaban use in patients with gynecologic malignancies at an academic medical center: A pilot study.

Jessie R Signorelli1, Arpita S Gandhi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with gynecologic malignancies are at an increased risk for venous thromboembolism. National guidelines recommend treatment of an acute venous thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparin for 5-10 days followed by long-term secondary prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for at least six months. Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants are not currently recommended to be used in cancer patients for the management of venous thromboembolism because robust data on their efficacy and safety have yet to become available in cancer patients. The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of gynecologic oncology patients with venous thromboembolism using rivaroxaban compared to warfarin or low molecular weight heparin as well as compare the safety and efficacy of these anticoagulants.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective pilot analysis of adult patients with gynecologic malignancies who received either rivaroxaban, warfarin or low molecular weight heparin for treatment of venous thromboembolism at Augusta University Medical Center from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2015. Statistical comparisons between the enoxaparin and rivaroxaban group were made using T-tests and Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, where appropriate.
RESULTS: Out of the 49 patients, 37% (18) patients were on rivaroxaban, 53% (26) on enoxaparin, and 10% (5) on warfarin. Only one patient (4%) in the enoxaparin group experienced a recurrent deep vein thrombosis while there were no cases of recurrent venous thromboembolism in the rivaroxaban and warfarin group. The incidence of major bleeding was 17% (n = 2), 20% (n = 1), and 8% (n = 2) in patients receiving rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, and warfarin, respectively. The rate of switching to a different anticoagulant than originally prescribed was 42% (n = 14) in the enoxaparin arm, and 5.5% (n = 1) in the rivaroxaban arm.
CONCLUSION: A high proportion of our gynecologic oncology patients received rivaroxaban for the management of venous thromboembolism. The sample size of this pilot analysis was too small to draw any conclusions regarding efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin and warfarin. High rate of rivaroxaban use in gynecologic oncology patients at our institution highlights the need for larger, well-designed randomized controlled trials to confirm the safety and efficacy of its use in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gynecologic cancer; new anticoagulants; rivaroxaban

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29157146     DOI: 10.1177/1078155217739683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  9 in total

1.  Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ang Li; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 2.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: New Insights from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez; Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Risk of recurrence and bleeding in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treated with rivaroxaban: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Mette Søgaard; Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Flemming Skjøth; Jette Nordstrøm Kjaeldgaard; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of different direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Authors:  Xiaojun Song; Zhili Liu; Rong Zeng; Jiang Shao; Bao Liu; Yuehong Zheng; Changwei Liu; Wei Ye
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

6.  Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Yi-Dan Yan; Sheng-Yan Yang; Long Shen; Ling-Cong Kong; Chi Zhang; An-Hua Wei; Zheng Li; Xin-Hua Wang; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

7.  Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiali Xing; Xiangbao Yin; Desheng Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Comparison of rivaroxaban and dalteparin for the long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Jang Ho Lee; Joo Hee Lee; Kyung Wook Jo; Jin Won Huh; Yeon Mok Oh; Jae Seung Lee
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  The role of direct oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease in gynecologic cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Yeol Park
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.401

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.