Literature DB >> 29497852

Pedicle screw anchorage of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK screws under cyclic loading.

Richard A Lindtner1, Rene Schmid1, Thomas Nydegger2, Marko Konschake3, Werner Schmoelz4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pedicle screw loosening is a common and significant complication after posterior spinal instrumentation, particularly in osteoporosis. Radiolucent carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) pedicle screws have been developed recently to overcome drawbacks of conventional metallic screws, such as metal-induced imaging artifacts and interference with postoperative radiotherapy. Beyond radiolucency, CF/PEEK may also be advantageous over standard titanium in terms of pedicle screw loosening due to its unique material properties. However, screw anchorage and loosening of CF/PEEK pedicle screws have not been evaluated yet. The aim of this biomechanical study therefore was to evaluate whether the use of this alternative nonmetallic pedicle screw material affects screw loosening. The hypotheses tested were that (1) nonmetallic CF/PEEK pedicle screws resist an equal or higher number of load cycles until loosening than standard titanium screws and that (2) PMMA cement augmentation further increases the number of load cycles until loosening of CF/PEEK screws.
METHODS: In the first part of the study, left and right pedicles of ten cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (BMD 70.8 mg/cm3 ± 14.5) were randomly instrumented with either CF/PEEK or standard titanium pedicle screws. In the second part, left and right pedicles of ten vertebrae (BMD 56.3 mg/cm3 ± 15.8) were randomly instrumented with either PMMA-augmented or nonaugmented CF/PEEK pedicle screws. Each pedicle screw was subjected to cyclic cranio-caudal loading (initial load ranging from - 50 N to + 50 N) with stepwise increasing compressive loads (5 N every 100 cycles) until loosening or a maximum of 10,000 cycles. Angular screw motion ("screw toggling") within the vertebra was measured with a 3D motion analysis system every 100 cycles and by stress fluoroscopy every 500 cycles.
RESULTS: The nonmetallic CF/PEEK pedicle screws resisted a similar number of load cycles until loosening as the contralateral standard titanium screws (3701 ± 1228 vs. 3751 ± 1614 load cycles, p = 0.89). PMMA cement augmentation of CF/PEEK pedicle screws furthermore significantly increased the mean number of load cycles until loosening by 1.63-fold (5100 ± 1933 in augmented vs. 3130 ± 2132 in nonaugmented CF/PEEK screws, p = 0.015). In addition, angular screw motion assessed by stress fluoroscopy was significantly smaller in augmented than in nonaugmented CF/PEEK screws before as well as after failure.
CONCLUSIONS: Using nonmetallic CF/PEEK instead of standard titanium as pedicle screw material did not affect screw loosening in the chosen test setup, whereas cement augmentation enhanced screw anchorage of CF/PEEK screws. While comparable to titanium screws in terms of screw loosening, radiolucent CF/PEEK pedicle screws offer the significant advantage of not interfering with postoperative imaging and radiotherapy. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK; Cyclic loading; Elastic modulus; Osteoporosis; PEEK; Pedicle screw; Pedicle screw augmentation; Pedicle screw loosening; Polyetheretherketone; Posterior instrumentation; Spinal tumors; Spine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29497852     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5538-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

1.  First experience with Carbon/PEEK pedicle screws.

Authors:  Sven O Eicker; Kara Krajewski; Sebastian Payer; Theresa Krätzig; Marc Dreimann
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  Radiolucent Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Pedicle Screws for Treatment of Spinal Tumors: Advantages for Radiation Planning and Follow-Up Imaging.

Authors:  Florian Ringel; Yu-Mi Ryang; Jan S Kirschke; Birgit S Müller; Jan J Wilkens; Jeremy Brodard; Stephanie E Combs; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.104

3.  Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.

Authors:  A Rudisch; C Kremser; S Peer; A Kathrein; W Judmaier; H Daniaux
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; David Volkheimer; Sandra Reitmaier; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Annette Kienle; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.

Authors:  P Stradiotti; A Curti; G Castellazzi; A Zerbi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; John N Devine
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Reduced loosening rate and loss of correction following posterior stabilization with or without PMMA augmentation of pedicle screws in vertebral fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  A El Saman; S Meier; A Sander; A Kelm; I Marzi; H Laurer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Jan Bredow; C K Boese; C M L Werner; J Siewe; L Löhrer; K Zarghooni; P Eysel; M J Scheyerer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  Perturbation effects of the carbon fiber-PEEK screws on radiotherapy dose distribution.

Authors:  Alexander Nevelsky; Egor Borzov; Shahar Daniel; Raquel Bar-Deroma
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  8 in total

1.  Can cavity-based pedicle screw augmentation decrease screw loosening? A biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Riesner; Thomas R Blattert; Renate Krezdorn; Simone Schädler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone orthopedic implants in musculoskeletal and spinal tumors: imaging and clinical features.

Authors:  Jeremiah R Long; Maziyar A Kalani; Krista A Goulding; Jonathan B Ashman; Jonathan A Flug
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  [Treatment strategies for pathological fractures of the spine].

Authors:  M Pishnamaz; V Quack; C Herren; F Hildebrand; P Kobbe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK instrumentation for spondylodiscitis: a single center experience on safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Joerger; Ehab Shiban; Sandro M Krieg; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The use of radiolucent pedicle fixation in degenerative lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Nathan Xie; Sihyong J Kim; Ralph J Mobbs; Rajesh Reddy
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Improved fixation stability for repairing pedicle screw loosening using a modified cement filling technique in porcine vertebrae.

Authors:  Ming-Kai Hsieh; Yun-Da Li; Yu-Chen Li; Mu-Yi Liu; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Po-Liang Lai; Ching-Lung Tai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Navigation accuracy and assessability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation with multimodal intraoperative imaging in spinal oncology.

Authors:  Vanessa Hubertus; Lars Wessels; Anton Früh; Dimitri Tkatschenko; Irini Nulis; Georg Bohner; Vincent Prinz; Julia Onken; Marcus Czabanka; Peter Vajkoczy; Nils Hecht
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

8.  Carbon fiber-reinforced pedicle screws reduce artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with lumbar spondylodesis.

Authors:  Christoph Fleege; Marcus Makowski; Michael Rauschmann; Katharina Luise Fraunhoffer; Peter Fennema; Mohammad Arabmotlagh; Marcus Rickert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.