Literature DB >> 9093822

Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

N Boos1, J K Webb.   

Abstract

Continuing controversy over the use of pedicular fixation in the United States is promoted by the lack of governmental approval for the marketing of these devices due to safety and efficacy concerns. These implants have meanwhile become an invaluable part of spinal instrumentation in Europe. With regard to the North American view, there is a lack of comprehensive reviews that consider the historical evolution of pedicle screw systems, the rationales for their application, and the clinical outcome from a European perspective. This literature review suggests that pedicular fixation is a relatively safe procedure and is not associated with a significantly higher complication risk than non-pedicular instrumentation. Pedicle screw fixation provides short, rigid segmental stabilization that allows preservation of motion segments and stabilization of the spine in the absence of intact posterior elements, which is not possible with non-pedicular instrumentation. Fusion rates and clinical outcome in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures appear to be superior to that achieved using other forms of treatment. For the correction of spinal deformity (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, spondylolisthesis, tumor), pedicular fixation provides the theoretical benefit of rigid segmental fixation and of facilitated deformity correction by a posterior approach, but the clinical relevance so far remains unknown. In low-back pain disorders, a literature analysis of 5,600 cases of lumbar fusion with different techniques reveals a trend that pedicle screw fixation enhances the fusion rate but not clinical outcome. The most striking finding in the literature is the large range in the radiological and clinical results. For every single fusion technique poor and excellent results have been described. This review argues that European spine surgeons should begin to back up the evident benefits of pedicle screw systems for specific spinal disorders by controlled prospective clinical trials. This may prevent forthcoming medical licensing authorities from restricting the use of pedicle screw devices and dictating the practice of spinal surgery in Europe in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9093822      PMCID: PMC3454634          DOI: 10.1007/bf01676569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  183 in total

Review 1.  Surgical correction of myelomeningocele scoliosis: a critical appraisal of various spinal instrumentation systems.

Authors:  W T Ward; D R Wenger; J W Roach
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  [Anatomical study of the vertebral pedicles. Surgical application].

Authors:  G Saillant
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1976-03

3.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis and degenerative scoliosis treated with a combination segmental rod-plate and transpedicular screw instrumentation system: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K W Chang; P C McAfee
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1988

4.  [Segmental spinal instrumentation in neuromuscular scolioses].

Authors:  E R Luque
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Osteosynthesis of dorsal, lumbar, and lumbosacral spine with metallic plates screwed into vertebral pedicles and articular apophyses].

Authors:  R Roy-Camille; M Roy-Camille; C Demeulenaere
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  Anterior transperitoneal lumbar fusion.

Authors:  D Freebody; R Bendall; R D Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1971-11

7.  Surgical management of isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  L P Johnson; R J Nasca; W K Dunham
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Pedicle screw fixation in the spine.

Authors:  R C Mulholland
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-07

9.  [Technique of surgical correction of post-traumatic kyphosis].

Authors:  W Wawro; N Boos; M Aebi
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Treatment of spondylolisthesis by posterolateral fusion, resection of the pars interarticularis, and prompt mobilization of the patient. An end-result study of seventy-three patients.

Authors:  C Rombold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  70 in total

1.  Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Zagra; L Minoia; M Archetti; A S Corriero; K Ricci; M Teli; F Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Pedicle screw-based systems for dynamic stabilization : An insight into the philosophy, technique, indications and success of these systems].

Authors:  J Richolt; M Rauschmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Assessment of the morpho-densitometric parameters of the lumbar pedicles in osteoporotic and control women undergoing routine abdominal MDCT examinations.

Authors:  Antonios E Papadakis; Apostolos H Karantanas; Giorgos Papadokostakis; John Damilakis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Triggered electromyography for placement of thoracic pedicle screws: is it reliable?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; Mark Tantorski; Patrick J Cahill; Ashish Ranade; Stephen Koch; David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Jahangir Asghar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adjacent segment instability after treatment with a Graf ligament at minimum 8 years' followup.

Authors:  Yongsoo Choi; Kisoo Kim; Kwangyoung So
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 8.  Pelvic fixation for adult scoliosis.

Authors:  Francis H Shen; Jonathan R Mason; Adam L Shimer; Vincent M Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Treatment of fixed thoracolumbar kyphosis in immature achondroplastic patient: posterior column resection combined with segmental pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion.

Authors:  Ahmet Yilmaz Sarlak; Levent Buluç; Yonca Anik; Kaya Memişoğlu; Bariş Kurtgöz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Combined spinal arthrodesis with instrumentation for the management of progressive thoracolumbar kyphosis in children with mucopolysaccharidosis.

Authors:  Enrique Garrido; Félix Tomé-Bermejo; Christopher I Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.