A El Saman1, S Meier2, A Sander2, A Kelm2, I Marzi2, H Laurer2. 1. Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. andre.elsaman@kgu.de. 2. Department of Trauma, Hand, and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Therapy of vertebral fractures in the elderly is a growing challenge for surgeons. Within the last two decades, the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures has been widely established. Besides vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, the augmentation of pedicle screws with PMMA found widespread use to strengthen the implant-bone interface. Several studies showed an enhanced pullout strength of augmented screws compared to standard pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone models. To validate the clinical relevance, we analyzed postoperative radiologic follow-up data in regard to secondary loss of correction and loosening of pedicle screws in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 24 patients admitted to our level I trauma center were analyzed concerning screw loosening and secondary loss of correction following vertebral fracture and posterior instrumentation. Loss of correction was determined by the bisegmental Cobb angle and kyphosis angle of the fractured vertebra. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to analyze the prevalence of clear zones around the pedicle screws as a sign of loosening. RESULTS: In 15 patients (mean age 76 ± 9.3 years) with 117 PMMA-augmented pedicle screws, 4.3 % of screws showed signs of loosening, whereas in nine patients (mean age 75 ± 8.2 years) with 86 uncemented screws, the loosening rate was 62.8 %. Thus, PMMA-augmented pedicle screws showed a significantly lower loosening rate compared to regular pedicle screws. Loss of correction was minimal, despite poor bone quality. There was significantly less loss of correction in patients with augmented pedicle screws (1.1° ± 0.8°) as compared to patients without augmentation (5° ± 3.8°). CONCLUSION: The reinforcement of pedicle screws using PMMA augmentation may be a viable option in the surgical treatment of spinal fractures in the elderly.
BACKGROUND: Therapy of vertebral fractures in the elderly is a growing challenge for surgeons. Within the last two decades, the use of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures has been widely established. Besides vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, the augmentation of pedicle screws with PMMA found widespread use to strengthen the implant-bone interface. Several studies showed an enhanced pullout strength of augmented screws compared to standard pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone models. To validate the clinical relevance, we analyzed postoperative radiologic follow-up data in regard to secondary loss of correction and loosening of pedicle screws in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, 24 patients admitted to our level I trauma center were analyzed concerning screw loosening and secondary loss of correction following vertebral fracture and posterior instrumentation. Loss of correction was determined by the bisegmental Cobb angle and kyphosis angle of the fractured vertebra. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were used to analyze the prevalence of clear zones around the pedicle screws as a sign of loosening. RESULTS: In 15 patients (mean age 76 ± 9.3 years) with 117 PMMA-augmented pedicle screws, 4.3 % of screws showed signs of loosening, whereas in nine patients (mean age 75 ± 8.2 years) with 86 uncemented screws, the loosening rate was 62.8 %. Thus, PMMA-augmented pedicle screws showed a significantly lower loosening rate compared to regular pedicle screws. Loss of correction was minimal, despite poor bone quality. There was significantly less loss of correction in patients with augmented pedicle screws (1.1° ± 0.8°) as compared to patients without augmentation (5° ± 3.8°). CONCLUSION: The reinforcement of pedicle screws using PMMA augmentation may be a viable option in the surgical treatment of spinal fractures in the elderly.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fenestrated pedicle screw; Loosening rate; Loss of correction; Osteoporosis; PMMA
Authors: C Knop; M Blauth; V Bühren; M Arand; H J Egbers; P M Hax; J Nothwang; H J Oestern; A Pizanis; R Roth; A Weckbach; A Wentzensen Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: C Knop; M Blauth; V Bühren; P M Hax; L Kinzl; W Mutschler; A Pommer; C Ulrich; S Wagner; A Weckbach; A Wentzensen; O Wörsdörfer Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: Philippe E Paré; James L Chappuis; Raja Rampersaud; Amit O Agarwala; Joseph H Perra; Serkan Erkan; Chunhui Wu Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Michael Werner; Niels Hammer; Christian Rotsch; Isabell Berthold; Mario Leimert Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 2.602