Literature DB >> 19437043

Metal-related artifacts in instrumented spine. Techniques for reducing artifacts in CT and MRI: state of the art.

P Stradiotti1, A Curti, G Castellazzi, A Zerbi.   

Abstract

The projectional nature of radiogram limits its amount of information about the instrumented spine. MRI and CT imaging can be more helpful, using cross-sectional view. However, the presence of metal-related artifacts at both conventional CT and MRI imaging can obscure relevant anatomy and disease. We reviewed the literature about overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopaedic implants at high-field strength MRI imaging and multi-detector CT. The evolution of multichannel CT has made available new techniques that can help minimizing the severe beam-hardening artifacts. The presence of artifacts at CT from metal hardware is related to image reconstruction algorithm (filter), tube current (in mA), X-ray kilovolt peak, pitch, hardware composition, geometry (shape), and location. MRI imaging has been used safely in patients with orthopaedic metallic implants because most of these implants do not have ferromagnetic properties and have been fixed into position. However, on MRI imaging metallic implants may produce geometric distortion, the so-called susceptibility artifact. In conclusion, although 140 kV and high milliamperage second exposures are recommended for imaging patients with hardware, caution should always be exercised, particularly in children, young adults, and patients undergoing multiple examinations. MRI artifacts can be minimized by positioning optimally and correctly the examined anatomy part with metallic implants in the magnet and by choosing fast spin-echo sequences, and in some cases also STIR sequences, with an anterior to posterior frequency-encoding direction and the smallest voxel size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19437043      PMCID: PMC2899595          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0998-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  34 in total

1.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.

Authors:  L M White; J K Kim; M Mehta; N Merchant; M E Schweitzer; W B Morrison; C R Hutchison; A E Gross
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative hip.

Authors:  C Czerny; C Krestan; H Imhof; S Trattnig
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-08

3.  Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images.

Authors:  J D Port; M G Pomper
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Quantitative assessment of an MR technique for reducing metal artifact: application to spin-echo imaging in a phantom.

Authors:  M J Lee; D L Janzen; P L Munk; A MacKay; Q S Xiang; A McGowen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  MRI of spinal hardware: comparison of conventional T1-weighted sequence with a new metal artifact reduction sequence.

Authors:  S D Chang; M J Lee; P L Munk; D L Janzen; A MacKay; Q S Xiang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  MRI susceptibility artefacts related to scaphoid screws: the effect of screw type, screw orientation and imaging parameters.

Authors:  M Ganapathi; G Joseph; R Savage; A R Jones; B Timms; K Lyons
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2002-04

7.  Metal artifact reduction sequence: early clinical applications.

Authors:  R V Olsen; P L Munk; M J Lee; D L Janzen; A L MacKay; Q S Xiang; B Masri
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 8.  Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT.

Authors:  Mi-Jung Lee; Sungjun Kim; Sung-Ah Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Yong-Min Huh; Dae-Hong Kim; Seung Hwan Han; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 9.  Technical considerations: CT and MR imaging in the postoperative orthopedic patient.

Authors:  Lawrence M White; Kenneth A Buckwalter
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.777

10.  Metallic artefacts in MR imaging: effects of main field orientation and strength.

Authors:  A Guermazi; Y Miaux; S Zaim; C G Peterfy; D White; H K Genant
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  55 in total

1.  Reducing the effects of metal artefact using high keV monoenergetic reconstruction of dual energy CT (DECT) in hip replacements.

Authors:  Mark Lewis; Karen Reid; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  An illustrative review to understand and manage metal-induced artifacts in musculoskeletal MRI: a primer and updates.

Authors:  J P Dillenseger; S Molière; P Choquet; C Goetz; M Ehlinger; G Bierry
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Total ankle arthroplasty: optimizing computed tomography imaging protocol.

Authors:  Ia Kohonen; Helka Koivu; Tero Vahlberg; Heli Larjava; Kimmo Mattila
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Imaging following surgery for primary appendicular bone tumours.

Authors:  Imran Khan; Craig Gerrand; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  [Degenerative diseases of the spine].

Authors:  K I Schmidt; J Viera; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.

Authors:  A R G Cortes; R Abdala-Junior; M Weber; E S Arita; J L Ackerman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI?

Authors:  Linda Berg; Hanne Thoresen; Gesche Neckelmann; Håvard Furunes; Christian Hellum; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Kinematic Accuracy in Tracking Total Wrist Arthroplasty with Biplane Videoradiography using a CT-generated Model.

Authors:  Bardiya Akhbari; Amy Morton; Douglas Moore; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Scott W Wolfe; Joseph Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  SSh versus TSE sequence protocol in rapid MR examination of pediatric patients with programmable drainage system.

Authors:  Eva Brichtová; J Šenkyřík
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.