Literature DB >> 7714265

Modulation detection interference using random and sinusoidal amplitude modulation.

L Mendoza1, J W Hall, J H Grose.   

Abstract

The detection of amplitude modulation (AM) of a target sound is made more difficult by the presence of a modulated sound some spectral distance from the target. This effect (modulation detection interference, or MDI) was examined for stimuli with random amplitude modulations (RAM) and for sounds with sinusoidal amplitude modulations (SAM) as a function of average modulation depth (m) of the interferer. In an experiment comparing comodulated and independent RAM targets and interferers, the amount of interference was not related to the modulation coherence of the target and interferer. Elevations in AM threshold increased as a function of m in a similar way for both conditions. The MDI for RAM and SAM targets and interferers was also compared. While no difference was found for AM detection of RAM and SAM, MDI was found to be greater for the RAM stimuli than for the SAM stimuli. A subsidiary experiment comparing RAM and SAM modulation depth discrimination indicated that RAM discrimination is more difficult than SAM discrimination. Taken together, these results are quantitatively consistent with a mechanism resembling AM discrimination as the underpinning of MDI in conditions where the target and interferer are synchronously gated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7714265     DOI: 10.1121/1.413100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  3 in total

1.  Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Christian Lorenzi; Laurianne Cabrera; Lori J Leibold; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.