Literature DB >> 32808159

Attention fluctuations impact ongoing maintenance of information in working memory.

Nicole Hakim1,2, Megan T deBettencourt3,4, Edward Awh3,4,5, Edward K Vogel3,4,5.   

Abstract

Working memory maintains information in a readily accessible state and has been shown to degrade as the length of the retention interval increases. Previous research has suggested that this decline is attributable to changes in precision as well as sudden loss of item representations. Here, by measuring trial-to-trial variations in performance, we examined an orthogonal distinction between the maximum number of items that an individual can store, and the probability of achieving that maximum. Across two experiments, we replicated the finding that performance declines after long (10 s) retention intervals, as well as past observations that forgetting was due to probabilistic dropping of individual items rather than all-or-none losses of the stored memories. Critically, longer retention intervals did not reduce the maximum amount of information that could be stored in working memory. Instead, lower attentional control accounted for a decreased probability of maintaining the maximum number of items in working memory. Thus, longer retention intervals impact working memory storage via fluctuations in attentional control that lower the probability of achieving a stable maximum storage capacity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive and attentional control; Computational modeling; Retention interval; Whole report

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32808159      PMCID: PMC7708461          DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01790-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Interactions between attention and working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; E K Vogel; S-H Oh
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Forgetting in immediate serial recall: decay, temporal distinctiveness, or interference?

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Stephan Lewandowsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

4.  Clear evidence for item limits in visual working memory.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Irida Mance; Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evidence of gradual loss of precision for simple features and complex objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rosanne L Rademaker; Young Eun Park; Alexander T Sack; Frank Tong
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-10

9.  Verbal labeling, gradual decay, and sudden death in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Chris Donkin; Robert Nosofsky; Jason Gold; Richard Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-02

10.  Drift in Neural Population Activity Causes Working Memory to Deteriorate Over Time.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; Paul M Bays
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sustained Attention and Spatial Attention Distinctly Influence Long-term Memory Encoding.

Authors:  Megan T deBettencourt; Stephanie D Williams; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.420

2.  Mechanisms of feature binding in visual working memory are stable over long delays.

Authors:  Georgina Brown; Iham Kasem; Paul M Bays; Sebastian Schneegans
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.