| Literature DB >> 29491361 |
Ladan Khodaparast1,2,3, Laleh Khodaparast1,2,3, Rodrigo Gallardo2,3, Nikolaos N Louros2,3, Emiel Michiels2,3, Reshmi Ramakrishnan2,3, Meine Ramakers2,3, Filip Claes2,3, Lydia Young4,5, Mohammad Shahrooei1, Hannah Wilkinson2,3, Matyas Desager2,3, Wubishet Mengistu Tadesse6, K Peter R Nilsson7, Per Hammarström7, Abram Aertsen6, Sebastien Carpentier8, Johan Van Eldere9, Frederic Rousseau10,11, Joost Schymkowitz12,13.
Abstract
Aggregation is a sequence-specific process, nucleated by short aggregation-prone regions (APRs) that can be exploited to induce aggregation of proteins containing the same APR. Here, we find that most APRs are unique within a proteome, but that a small minority of APRs occur in many proteins. When aggregation is nucleated in bacteria by such frequently occurring APRs, it leads to massive and lethal inclusion body formation containing a large number of proteins. Buildup of bacterial resistance against these peptides is slow. In addition, the approach is effective against drug-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baumannii, reducing bacterial load in a murine bladder infection model. Our results indicate that redundant APRs are weak points of bacterial protein homeostasis and that targeting these may be an attractive antibacterial strategy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29491361 PMCID: PMC5830399 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03131-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Proteome analysis, design, and screening of redundant APRs. a Distribution of the redundancy of APR sequences of length seven in the E. coli proteome: percentage of identical sequences (red), one mismatch (blue), and two mismatches (green). b Same distribution as in a for the 75 most redundant APRs in E. coli. c Design pattern for aggregating peptide screen. Tandem APRs are linked by a linker (a single proline residue) and embedded between gatekeeper residues (GK; arginine residues). d, e APR redundancy for toxic versus nontoxic peptides considering one (d) or two (e) mismatches. The bottom and top of the boxes are the first and third quartiles, and the band inside the box represents the median. The whiskers encompass the minimum and maximum of the data. Significant differences were computed using Welch’s t test. f Time-killing curve of selected peptides (P14, P2, and P5R) and ampicillin (Amp) against E. coli strain O157:H7 treated at MIC concentration (average and SD of three replicates). g–i Transmission electron microcopy (TEM) of cross-sections of resin-embedded E. coli O157:H7, treated for 2 h with buffer (g), P2 peptide (h), and P105 peptide (i) at MIC concentration. j Wide-field structured illumination microscopy (SIM) image of E. coli O157:H7 treated with P2 and stained with the amyloid-specific dye pFTAA (0.5 µM). k Monitoring of spontaneous buildup of resistance by monitoring the MIC value of E. coli O157: H7 cultures that are maintained on sublethal doses (50% of MIC) of selected peptides (P14, P2, and P105) or ampicillin (Amp) for 36 days
MIC and MBC values of selected peptides purified by HPLC grade on E. coli O157
| Purified peptide | Sequences | MIC (μg/mL) | MBC (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| P2 | RGLGLALVRRPRGLGLALVRR | 6 | 6 |
| P2Pro | RGLGPALPRRPRGLGPALPRR | >100 | >100 |
| P5 | RALLTTLLRRPRALLTTLLRR | 6 | 6 |
| P5R | RRALLTTLLRRPRALLTTLLRR | 12 | 12 |
| P105 | RALLRTLLRRPRALLTTLLRR | 12 | 12 |
| P14 | RGLLALLARRPRGLLALLARR | 6 | 6 |
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, MBC minimum bactericidal concentration, HPLC high-performance liquid chromatography
Fig. 2Uptake and inclusion body formation. a–e Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of 40,000 E. coli O157: H7 cells, measuring FITC fluorescence (x-axis) and propidium iodide (PI) fluorescence (y-axis) of a untreated and heat-inactivated bacteria mixed at a ratio of 1:1 and b–e bacteria treated for 15 min (b), 1 h (c), 3 h (d), and 6 h (e) with FITC-labeled P2 at MIC concentration. f Average population sizes of FITC-positive cells treated with FITC-P2 or FITC-P2Pro from four independent experiments such as those shown in b–e. g Wide-field structured illumination microscopy (SIM) image of E. coli treated with FITC-P2 for 15 min and h for 1 h at MIC concentration. i Time-dependent cell death following P2 treatment (1 x MIC) as % CFU/mL, in E. coli O157:H7. j Average population sizes of PI-positive cells (propidium iodide) from four independent FACS experiments such as those shown in a–e. k FACS analysis of 40,000 E. coli O157:H7 cells, measuring pFTAA fluorescence (x-axis) and PI fluorescence (y-axis) after 3 h of treatment with P2 at MIC concentration. l Same as h, but after treatment with 100 μg/mL P2Pro
Fig. 3Inclusion body formation and proteostatic collapse. a Growth curve of E. coli BL21-overexpressing p53CD (red) and control in the presence (green) or absence (blue) of P2 (average and SD of three replicates). p53CD bacterial growth in the presence of 0.4 mM IPTG. b Colony formation by E. coli BL21 p53CD-overexpressing bacteria. The bottom and top of the box are the first and third quartiles, and the band inside the box represents the median. The whiskers are drawn using Tukey’s method and show the extreme values that fall within 1.5 times the interquartile range. c Transmission electron microscopy image of an inclusion body from P2-treated E. coli O157:H7 (uranyl acetate). d Representative Coomassie blue SDS-PAGE of inclusion bodies from E. coli BL21-overexpressing p53CD (lane 1), mock (lane 2), and E. coli O157:H7 treated with P2 (lane 4), P2Pro (lane 5), or DMSO (lane 6). Molecular-weight markers are shown in lanes 3 and 7. e Western blot for dnaK, groEL, tig, and dnaJ of the same samples than that in d. f Fluorescence microscopy image of E. coli cells stably expressing a fluorescent fusion of DnaK (mCer) treated with P2 at MIC concentration. g Growth inhibition of cells treated with P2 with/without erythromycin (Erm, 100 μg/mL, average and SD of three replicates). h Percent of colony-forming units after treating bacterial KO strains (KEIO) for 1 h with P2 at its MIC concentration. i Percent of colony-forming units of chaperone-overexpressing E. coli strains treated by P2 peptide at MIC concentration for 1 h. Significant differences from the WT are calculated using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple-comparison test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001, ****P ≤ 0.0001
MIC of P2 for chaperone deletion strains
| Gene deletion | MIC (μg/mL) | Protein name | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEIO WT | 12 | ||
| ∆ | 12 | ClpP | Proteolytic subunit of the Clp protease |
| ∆ | 12 | ClpA | Substrate-specifying adapter for the Clp protease |
| ∆ | 12 | ClpS | Specificity adapter for the Clp protease (binds to and modulates ClpA) |
| ∆ | 12 | ClpX | ATP-binding subunit of the Clp protease |
| ∆ | 12 | Lon | ATP-dependent protease, required for suppression of aggregation |
| ∆ | 12 | SulA | Suppressor of Lon |
| ∆ | 12 | ClpB | Disaggregase of the Hsp100 family |
| ∆ | 6 | DnaK | Folding chaperone of the Hsp70 family |
| ∆ | 12 | DnaJ | Cochaperone to DnaK of the Hsp40 family |
| ∆ | n/a | GrpE | Nucleotide exchange factor for DnaK |
| ∆ | 12 | Folding chaperone of the Hsp90 family | |
| ∆ | 12 | GroEL | Folding chaperone of the Hsp60 family |
| ∆ | n/a | GroES | Cochaperone of Hsp60, of the Hsp10 family |
| ∆ | 12 | Hsp33 | Oxidative stress-induced holdase |
| ∆ | 6 | Hsp31 | Heat-dependent and temperature-stress-dependent holdase |
| ∆ | 12 | IbpA | Small Hsp of the α-crystallin family |
| ∆ | 12 | ibpB | Small Hsp of the α-crystallin family |
| ∆ | 12 | Trigger factor | Cotranslational folding chaperone, ribosome-associated |
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, WTwild type, Hsp heat shock protein
MIC of P2 after chaperone overexpression in BL21
| Plasmid | Overexpressed chaperone(s) | MIC (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| pG-KJE8 | dnaK-dnaJ-grpE groES-groEL | 25 |
| pGro7 | groES-groEL | 25 |
| pKJE7 | dnaK-dnaJ-grpE | 25 |
| pG-Tf2 | groES-groEL-tig | 25 |
| pTf16 | tig | 25 |
| wt | — | 25 |
MIC minimum inhibitory concentration
Fig. 4Cross-seeding and in vivo activity. a Concentration-dependent hemolysis of human erythrocytes by selected peptides (average and SD of three replicates) shown as percent of hemolysis compared to 1% Triton. b, c Cytoxicity of P2 (black bars) and P2Pro (gray) to human HeLa cells measured using the CellTiter Blue assay (b) (average and SD of three replicates) and the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay (average and SD of three replicates), represented as percentage of cell survival compared to control. d Fluorescence micrography of HeLa cells mixed with E. coli O157:H7, treated with FITC-P2 (green channel). Blue is DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), red is CellMask Deep Red. e Aggregation kinetics of the Alzheimer β (Aβ) peptide at 50 µM with/without P2, monitored using thioflavin-T fluorescence (average and s.d. of three replicates). f Same as b for human islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP). g Inhibitory effect of 5, 25, and 50 µg/mL P2 on bacterial growth in the presence of human blood serum (25 or 50%; average and SD of three replicates). h ELISA on immobilized FITC-P2 using blood serum of mice treated for 18 days with 30 mg/kg P2. An anti-FITC antibody was used as a positive control for peptide immobilization (three replicates from three mice). i–l Antibacterial efficacy of P2 in a mouse model of bladder infection. The bacterial load of mice infected with E. coli O157:H7 transurethrally was determined after treatment with P2 (P2 administered urethrally (P2 UT) or intraperitoneally (P2 IP)) and controls (ampicillin administered orally (Amp.oral), buffer (mock), and P2Pro administered urethrally (P2Pro2.UT)) in i kidney, j colon, k bladder, and l ureter. Each treatment group consisted of 15 animals. Bacterial loads are expressed as log10(CFU/mL). See text and Methods for more details. Plots i–l show individual measurements, as well as mean and s.d. Significant differences were calculated using ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ***P ≤ 0.001