Literature DB >> 16359707

How evolutionary pressure against protein aggregation shaped chaperone specificity.

Frederic Rousseau1, Luis Serrano, Joost W H Schymkowitz.   

Abstract

As protein aggregation is potentially lethal, control of protein conformation by molecular chaperones is essential for cellular organisms. This is especially important during protein expression and translocation, since proteins are then unfolded and therefore most susceptible to form non-native interactions. Using TANGO, a statistical mechanics algorithm to predict protein aggregation, we here analyse the aggregation propensities of 28 complete proteomes. Our results show that between 10% and 20% of the residues in these proteomes are within aggregating protein segments and that this represents a lower limit for the aggregation tendency of globular proteins. Further, we show that not only evolution strongly pressurizes aggregation downwards by minimizing the amount of strongly aggregating sequences but also by selectively capping strongly aggregating hydrophobic protein sequences with arginine, lysine and proline. These residues are strongly favoured at these positions as they function as gatekeepers that are most efficient at opposing aggregation. Finally, we demonstrate that the substrate specificity of different unrelated chaperone families is geared by these gatekeepers. Chaperones face the difficulty of having to combine substrate affinity for a broad range of hydrophobic sequences and selectivity for those hydrophobic sequences that aggregate most strongly. We show that chaperones achieve these requirements by preferentially binding hydrophobic sequences that are capped by positively charged gatekeeper residues. In other words, targeting evolutionarily selected gatekeepers allows chaperones to prioritize substrate recognition according to aggregation propensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16359707     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.11.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  107 in total

1.  Potential aggregation-prone regions in complementarity-determining regions of antibodies and their contribution towards antigen recognition: a computational analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoling Wang; Satish K Singh; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Mechanisms of protein oligomerization, the critical role of insertions and deletions in maintaining different oligomeric states.

Authors:  Kosuke Hashimoto; Anna R Panchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The mechanism of fibril formation of a non-inhibitory serpin ovalbumin revealed by the identification of amyloidogenic core regions.

Authors:  Naoki Tanaka; Yumi Morimoto; Yurika Noguchi; Tomoko Tada; Tomonori Waku; Shigeru Kunugi; Takashi Morii; Yin-Fai Lee; Takashi Konno; Nobuyuki Takahashi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Functional amyloid: turning swords into plowshares.

Authors:  Daniel Otzen
Journal:  Prion       Date:  2010-10-17       Impact factor: 3.931

5.  α-Galactosidase aggregation is a determinant of pharmacological chaperone efficacy on Fabry disease mutants.

Authors:  Aleksandra Siekierska; Greet De Baets; Joke Reumers; Rodrigo Gallardo; Stanislav Rudyak; Kerensa Broersen; Jose Couceiro; Joost Van Durme; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Selection on protein structure, interaction, and sequence.

Authors:  Peter B Chi; David A Liberles
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Substrate recognition by AAA+ ATPases: distinct substrate binding modes in ATP-dependent protease Yme1 of the mitochondrial intermembrane space.

Authors:  Martin Graef; Georgeta Seewald; Thomas Langer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Defined DNA sequences promote the assembly of a bacterial protein into distinct amyloid nanostructures.

Authors:  Rafael Giraldo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Prevention of amyloid-like aggregation as a driving force of protein evolution.

Authors:  Elodie Monsellier; Fabrizio Chiti
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 8.807

10.  Gatekeeper residues in the major curlin subunit modulate bacterial amyloid fiber biogenesis.

Authors:  Xuan Wang; Yizhou Zhou; Juan-Jie Ren; Neal D Hammer; Matthew R Chapman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.