Literature DB >> 22706763

Aggregation gatekeepers modulate protein homeostasis of aggregating sequences and affect bacterial fitness.

Jacinte Beerten1, Wim Jonckheere, Stanislav Rudyak, Jie Xu, Hannah Wilkinson, Frederik De Smet, Joost Schymkowitz, Frederic Rousseau.   

Abstract

The most common mechanism by which proteins aggregate consists in the assembly of short hydrophobic primary sequence segments into extended β-structured agglomerates. A significant enrichment of charged residues is observed at the flank of these aggregation-prone sequence segments, suggesting selective pressure against aggregation. These so-called aggregation gatekeepers act by increasing the intrinsic solubility of aggregating sequences in vitro, but it has been suggested that they could also facilitate chaperone interactions. Here, we address whether aggregation gatekeepers affect bacterial fitness. In Escherichia coli MC4100 we overexpressed GFP fusions with an aggregation-prone segment of σ32 (further termed σ32β) flanked by gatekeeper and non-gatekeeper residues and measured pairwise competitive growth. We found that the identity of flanking residues had significant effect on bacterial growth. Overexpression of σ32β flanked by its natural gatekeepers displayed the greatest competitive fitness, followed by other combinations of gatekeepers, while absence of gatekeepers strongly affects bacterial fitness. Further analysis showed the diversity of effects of gatekeepers on the proteostasis of σ32β including synthesis and degradation rates, in vivo aggregation propensity and chaperone response. Our results suggest that gatekeeper residues affect bacterial fitness not only by modulating the intrinsic aggregation propensity of proteins but also by the manner in which they affect the processing of σ32β-GFP by the protein quality control machinery of the cell. In view of these observations, we hypothesize that variation at gatekeeper positions offers a flexible selective strategy to modulate the proteostatic regulation of proteins to the match intrinsic aggregation propensities of proteins with required expression levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22706763     DOI: 10.1093/protein/gzs031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel        ISSN: 1741-0126            Impact factor:   1.650


  14 in total

1.  Substrate recognition in nuclear protein quality control degradation is governed by exposed hydrophobicity that correlates with aggregation and insolubility.

Authors:  Eric K Fredrickson; Pamela S Gallagher; Sarah V Clowes Candadai; Richard G Gardner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.

Authors:  Bert Houben; Emiel Michiels; Meine Ramakers; Katerina Konstantoulea; Nikolaos Louros; Joffré Verniers; Rob van der Kant; Matthias De Vleeschouwer; Nuno Chicória; Thomas Vanpoucke; Rodrigo Gallardo; Joost Schymkowitz; Frederic Rousseau
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Factors affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics.

Authors:  Karolina L Zapadka; Frederik J Becher; A L Gomes Dos Santos; Sophie E Jackson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Suppressing mutation-induced protein aggregation in mammalian cells by mutating residues significantly displaced upon the original mutation.

Authors:  Simpson Gregoire; Kelly Glitzos; Inchan Kwon
Journal:  Biochem Eng J       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.978

5.  Proteome response at the edge of protein aggregation.

Authors:  Natalia Sanchez de Groot; Ricardo A Gomes; Anna Villar-Pique; M Madan Babu; Ana Varela Coelho; Salvador Ventura
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.411

6.  Identification of Key Amino Acid Residues Modulating Intracellular and In vitro Microcin E492 Amyloid Formation.

Authors:  Paulina Aguilera; Andrés Marcoleta; Pablo Lobos-Ruiz; Rocío Arranz; José M Valpuesta; Octavio Monasterio; Rosalba Lagos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  Aggregation propensity of neuronal receptors: potential implications in neurodegenerative disorders.

Authors:  Susanna Navarro; Marta Diaz-Caballero; Ricard Illa; Salvador Ventura
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 8.  Bacterial Protein Homeostasis Disruption as a Therapeutic Intervention.

Authors:  Laleh Khodaparast; Guiqin Wu; Ladan Khodaparast; Béla Z Schmidt; Frederic Rousseau; Joost Schymkowitz
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  On the role of aggregation prone regions in protein evolution, stability, and enzymatic catalysis: insights from diverse analyses.

Authors:  Patrick M Buck; Sandeep Kumar; Satish K Singh
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  The importance of a gatekeeper residue on the aggregation of transthyretin: implications for transthyretin-related amyloidoses.

Authors:  Ricardo Sant'Anna; Carolina Braga; Nathalia Varejão; Karinne M Pimenta; Ricardo Graña-Montes; Aline Alves; Juliana Cortines; Yraima Cordeiro; Salvador Ventura; Debora Foguel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.