Literature DB >> 29486559

Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.

Samuel C Gill1, Nathan M Lim2, Patrick B Grinaway3,4, Ariën S Rustenburg3,4, Josh Fass4,5, Gregory A Ross4, John D Chodera6, David L Mobley1,2.   

Abstract

Accurately predicting protein-ligand binding affinities and binding modes is a major goal in computational chemistry, but even the prediction of ligand binding modes in proteins poses major challenges. Here, we focus on solving the binding mode prediction problem for rigid fragments. That is, we focus on computing the dominant placement, conformation, and orientations of a relatively rigid, fragment-like ligand in a receptor, and the populations of the multiple binding modes which may be relevant. This problem is important in its own right, but is even more timely given the recent success of alchemical free energy calculations. Alchemical calculations are increasingly used to predict binding free energies of ligands to receptors. However, the accuracy of these calculations is dependent on proper sampling of the relevant ligand binding modes. Unfortunately, ligand binding modes may often be uncertain, hard to predict, and/or slow to interconvert on simulation time scales, so proper sampling with current techniques can require prohibitively long simulations. We need new methods which dramatically improve sampling of ligand binding modes. Here, we develop and apply a nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC) method to improve sampling of ligand binding modes. In this technique, the ligand is rotated and subsequently allowed to relax in its new position through alchemical perturbation before accepting or rejecting the rotation and relaxation as a nonequilibrium Monte Carlo move. When applied to a T4 lysozyme model binding system, this NCMC method shows over 2 orders of magnitude improvement in binding mode sampling efficiency compared to a brute force molecular dynamics simulation. This is a first step toward applying this methodology to pharmaceutically relevant binding of fragments and, eventually, drug-like molecules. We are making this approach available via our new Binding modes of ligands using enhanced sampling (BLUES) package which is freely available on GitHub.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29486559      PMCID: PMC5980761          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  68 in total

1.  Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation.

Authors:  Araz Jakalian; David B Jack; Christopher I Bayly
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Efficient Generalized Born Models for Monte Carlo Simulations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Richard D Taylor; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 3.  Molecular modeling of organic and biomolecular systems using BOSS and MCPRO.

Authors:  William L Jorgensen; Julian Tirado-Rives
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Poses via a Combination of Induced Fit Docking and Metadynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Anthony J Clark; Pratyush Tiwary; Ken Borrelli; Shulu Feng; Edward B Miller; Robert Abel; Richard A Friesner; B J Berne
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 5.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask.

Authors:  Vijay S Pande; Kyle Beauchamp; Gregory R Bowman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Energetic origins of specificity of ligand binding in an interior nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme.

Authors:  A Morton; W A Baase; B W Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  D3R grand challenge 2015: Evaluation of protein-ligand pose and affinity predictions.

Authors:  Symon Gathiaka; Shuai Liu; Michael Chiu; Huanwang Yang; Jeanne A Stuckey; You Na Kang; Jim Delproposto; Ginger Kubish; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson; Stephen K Burley; W Patrick Walters; Rommie E Amaro; Victoria A Feher; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Identifying ligand binding sites and poses using GPU-accelerated Hamiltonian replica exchange molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Kai Wang; John D Chodera; Yanzhi Yang; Michael R Shirts
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06

10.  A multi-crystal method for extracting obscured crystallographic states from conventionally uninterpretable electron density.

Authors:  Nicholas M Pearce; Tobias Krojer; Anthony R Bradley; Patrick Collins; Radosław P Nowak; Romain Talon; Brian D Marsden; Sebastian Kelm; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M Deane; Frank von Delft
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  17 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Fragment Pose Prediction Using Non-equilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Nathan M Lim; Meghan Osato; Gregory L Warren; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  A mixed alchemical and equilibrium dynamics to simulate heterogeneous dense fluids: Illustrations for Lennard-Jones mixtures and phospholipid membranes.

Authors:  Arman Fathizadeh; Ron Elber
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Simulating Water Exchange to Buried Binding Sites.

Authors:  Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Charles Lin; Tom Kurtzman; Ross C Walker; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Enhancing Side Chain Rotamer Sampling Using Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Kalistyn H Burley; Samuel C Gill; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Alchemical Binding Free Energy Calculations in AMBER20: Advances and Best Practices for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Tai-Sung Lee; Bryce K Allen; Timothy J Giese; Zhenyu Guo; Pengfei Li; Charles Lin; T Dwight McGee; David A Pearlman; Brian K Radak; Yujun Tao; Hsu-Chun Tsai; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Sampling Conformational Changes of Bound Ligands Using Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Sukanya Sasmal; Samuel C Gill; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Challenges Encountered Applying Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Binding Free Energy Calculations.

Authors:  Hannah M Baumann; Vytautas Gapsys; Bert L de Groot; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Reversibly Sampling Conformations and Binding Modes Using Molecular Darting.

Authors:  Samuel C Gill; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Enhancing water sampling of buried binding sites using nonequilibrium candidate Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Teresa Danielle Bergazin; Ido Y Ben-Shalom; Nathan M Lim; Sam C Gill; Michael K Gilson; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.