| Literature DB >> 29472536 |
Benedict Borer1, Robin Tecon2, Dani Or2.
Abstract
Microbial activity in soil is spatially heterogeneous often forming spatial hotspots that contribute disproportionally to biogeochemical processes. Evidence suggests that bacterial spatial organization contributes to the persistence of anoxic hotspots even in unsaturated soils. Such processes are difficult to observe in situ at the microscale, hence mechanisms and time scales relevant for bacterial spatial organization remain largely qualitative. Here we develop an experimental platform based on glass-etched micrometric pore networks that mimics resource gradients postulated in soil aggregates to observe spatial organization of fluorescently tagged aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria. Two initially intermixed bacterial species, Pseudomonas putida and Pseudomonas veronii, segregate into preferential regions promoted by opposing gradients of carbon and oxygen (such persistent coexistence is not possible in well-mixed cultures). The study provides quantitative visualization and modeling of bacterial spatial organization within aggregate-like hotspots, a key step towards developing a mechanistic representation of bacterial community organization in soil pores.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29472536 PMCID: PMC5823907 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03187-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Conceptual view of a model pore network. Aerobes (blue) and anaerobes (red) spatially segregate in a natural soil aggregate due to anoxic conditions at the core (illustrating a central carbon source and oxygen diffusing from the aggregate outer surface). Glass-etched micrometric 2-D pore networks mimicking an idealized cross-section in a soil aggregate were used in the experiments. Chemical boundary conditions similar to those postulated for saturated soil aggregates within an unsaturated soil were imposed via 5 ports allowing access to an otherwise sealed pore network. The pore network geometry allows nutrient diffusion through saturated pores and ample space for bacterial flagellated motility. The emerging spatial self-organization of the two microbial species due to opposing nutrient sources and locally modified gradients can be directly visualized and quantified using fluorescence microscopy through the transparent glass walls
Fig. 2Images of the micrometric pore networks with varying levels of pore connectivity. The pore network connectivity was systematically reduced by randomly deleting channels (30% and 60% of the channels deleted in the 70% and 40% lattices, respectively) while ensuring that the network remains connected (maintains percolation across opposing sides). Four peripheral ports and one central port allow access to the otherwise hermetically sealed network. Overlaid colored networks show in silico simulated carbon gradients emerging 1 day after bacterial growth with carbon source in the central port and peripheral oxygen (with aerobes and anaerobes present in the network). The network geometry exerts a significant influence on network-wide concentration fields as shown with the overlaid carbon concentration. Microscopy images of the glass-etched micromodels with inoculated bacterial cells were taken from the central to a peripheral port (dashed yellow rectangle)
Fig. 3Experimentally observed spatial segregation of bacterial populations in a micrometric pore network. The facultative anaerobic Pseudomonas veronii strain 1YdBTEX2-mChe is tagged with the mCherry fluorescent protein and shown with pseudo-color magenta, and the obligate aerobic Pseudomonas putida strain KT2440-gfp is tagged with the eGFP fluorescent protein and shown with pseudo-color cyan. The two species were mixed 1:1 in suspension and inoculated to the central port (total of ≈500 cells per species) of a pore network with a carbon source (citrate) located at the center and oxygen diffusing from the peripheral ports. Both species were able to disperse through the pore network by flagellated motility. The exemplary overlay fluorescence image (top) shows the distribution of the two bacterial populations in a transect across the 100% connected pore network (see inset) 1 week after inoculation (image contrast and brightness were enhanced for better visualization of the bacterial populations). The scale bar represents 500 μm. The two close-up images show individual bacterial cells within one microscopy image, as used for digital image analysis and cell counting (each scale bar represents 40 μm)
Fig. 4Distribution of aerobes and anaerobes as a function of spatial positioning within the different pore networks. Results show combined experimental cell distribution and simulation results from the mathematical model for all pore network connectivities (a–c), using counter-gradients of citrate (maximum concentration at center port) and oxygen (maximum concentration at peripheral ports). Experimental results are represented in boxplots (whiskers indicate minimum to maximum value of data) of three, four, and five experimental replicates for the 100%, 70%, and 40% pore networks, respectively. In the mathematical model results, thick line indicates the mean and shaded area includes 95% of all cells. In the experiments, bacterial cells in fluorescence microscopy images were identified using digital image analysis, mapped onto the pore network, and attributed to the closest nodes. These were subsequently grouped into bins with respect to their shortest path from the central port. A pore-scale segregation of the two species is visible within each connectivity. In the 40% lattice, the distribution is less clear due to perturbations of the pore network geometry. To test the role of counter-gradients, the experimental results in d depict bacterial distributions for carbon and oxygen collocated at the peripheral ports (eliminating counter-gradients) resulting in dominance of facultative anaerobes at both the central and peripheral ports. Simulations of this scenario would result in the dominance of aerobes at the peripheral port due to the (simplified) representation of P. veronii as an obligate anaerobe
Fig. 5Relative abundance of the two species in the community as a function of growth conditions and spatial structure of the environment. a Aerobes and facultative anaerobes were cocultured in shaken liquid medium to create an unstructured environment. A 1:1 ratio of aerobes to anaerobes was used to inoculate sealed serum flasks (to promote anaerobic respiration) or test tubes (aerobic respiration). After 72 h of incubation, culture samples were plated on selective agar media to determine the ratio of aerobes and anaerobes. Error bars show one standard deviation around the mean calculated from ten replicate cultures. Simulations represented a fully oxic and fully anoxic environment for the aerobic and anaerobic conditions, respectively. b Relative abundance of aerobes and anaerobes in pore networks calculated from results presented in Fig. 4a–c using counter-gradients (central carbon and peripheral oxygen). Error bars represent one standard deviation around the mean calculated from eight model realizations for mathematical results and three, four and five replicates for the experimental results in the 100%, 70% and 40% connectivity, respectively. In well-mixed environments represented as liquid flasks, very limited coexistence (aerobic conditions) or absence of coexistence (anaerobic conditions) were observed with dominance of obligate aerobes in the aerobic case and vice versa for the anaerobic case (a). Coexistence was facilitated due to the structured environment and resulting pore-scale segregation of the two species (b)
Parameters used in the mathematical model and their source reference
| Parameter | Description | Value | Unit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Diffusion coefficient of citrate | 5.9 × 10−10 | m2 s−1 |
[ |
|
| Diffusion coefficient of oxygen | 2 × 10−9 | m2 s−1 |
[ |
|
| Diffusion coefficient of nitrate | 1.7 × 10−9 | m2 s−1 |
[ |
|
| Average bacterial mass | 1 × 10−15 | kg |
[ |
|
| Mass at division | 2 × | kg |
[ |
|
| Mass at cell death | 0.2 × | kg |
[ |
| Y | Cell yield | 0.06 | kg mol−1 Citrate |
[ |
|
| Maximum aerobic growth rate | 6.9 × 10−6 | s−1 |
[ |
|
| Maximum anaerobic growth rate | 5.4 × 10−6 | s−1 |
[ |
|
| Half saturation coefficient for citrate | 0.05 | mM |
[ |
|
| Half saturation coefficient for oxygen | 0.0063 | mM |
[ |
|
| Half saturation coefficient for oxygen (inhibiting) | 0.0063 | mM |
[ |
|
| Half saturation coefficient for nitrate | 0.0351 | mM |
[ |
|
| Stoichiometry between oxygen and citrate | 2.2 | mol O2 mol−1 Citrate |
[ |
|
| Stoichiometry between nitrate and citrate | 10 | mol NO3 mol−1 Citrate |
[ |
|
| Unbiased tumbling probability | 0.25 | s−1 |
[ |
| χ | Chemotactic sensitivity | 2 × 10−8 | m2 s−1 |
[ |
| ν | Corrected cell velocity for one-dimensional movement | 2 | m s−1 |
[ |