Literature DB >> 21410622

iDynoMiCS: next-generation individual-based modelling of biofilms.

Laurent A Lardon1, Brian V Merkey, Sónia Martins, Andreas Dötsch, Cristian Picioreanu, Jan-Ulrich Kreft, Barth F Smets.   

Abstract

Individual-based modelling of biofilms accounts for the fact that individual organisms of the same species may well be in a different physiological state as a result of environmental gradients, lag times in responding to change, or noise in gene expression, which we have become increasingly aware of with the advent of single-cell microbiology. But progress in developing and using individual-based modelling has been hampered by different groups writing their own code and the lack of an available standard model. We therefore set out to merge most features of previous models and incorporate various improvements in order to provide a common basis for further developments. Four improvements stand out: the biofilm pressure field allows for shrinking or consolidating biofilms; the continuous-in-time extracellular polymeric substances excretion leads to more realistic fluid behaviour of the extracellular matrix, avoiding artefacts; the stochastic chemostat mode allows comparison of spatially uniform and heterogeneous systems; and the separation of growth kinetics from the individual cell allows condition-dependent switching of metabolism. As an illustration of the model's use, we used the latter feature to study how environmentally fluctuating oxygen availability affects the diversity and composition of a community of denitrifying bacteria that induce the denitrification pathway under anoxic or low oxygen conditions. We tested the hypothesis that the existence of these diverse strategies of denitrification can be explained solely by assuming that faster response incurs higher costs. We found that if the ability to switch metabolic pathways quickly incurs no costs the fastest responder is always the best. However, if there is a trade-off where faster switching incurs higher costs, then there is a strategy with optimal response time for any frequency of environmental fluctuations, suggesting that different types of denitrifying strategies win in different environments. In a single environment, biodiversity of denitrifiers is higher in biofilms than chemostats, higher with than without costs and higher at intermediate frequency of change. The highly modular nature of the new computational model made this case study straightforward to implement, and reflects the sort of novel studies that can easily be executed with the new model.
© 2011 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21410622     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02414.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  81 in total

1.  Nitrate levels modulate the abundance of Paracoccus sp. in a biofilm community.

Authors:  Shantanu Singh; Anuradha S Nerurkar; C S Srinandan
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  A Roadblock-and-Kill Mechanism of Action Model for the DNA-Targeting Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  Nikola Ojkic; Elin Lilja; Susana Direito; Angela Dawson; Rosalind J Allen; Bartlomiej Waclaw
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment Methods for Biofilm Growth: A Mini-review.

Authors:  Christina Wilson; Rachel Lukowicz; Stefan Merchant; Helena Valquier-Flynn; Jeniffer Caballero; Jasmin Sandoval; Macduff Okuom; Christopher Huber; Tessa Durham Brooks; Erin Wilson; Barbara Clement; Christopher D Wentworth; Andrea E Holmes
Journal:  Res Rev J Eng Technol       Date:  2017-10-24

4.  Challenges of biofilm control and utilization: lessons from mathematical modelling.

Authors:  Paulina A Dzianach; Gary A Dykes; Norval J C Strachan; Ken J Forbes; Francisco J Pérez-Reche
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Continuum and discrete approach in modeling biofilm development and structure: a review.

Authors:  M R Mattei; L Frunzo; B D'Acunto; Y Pechaud; F Pirozzi; G Esposito
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 6.  Cutting through the complexity of cell collectives.

Authors:  Carey D Nadell; Vanni Bucci; Knut Drescher; Simon A Levin; Bonnie L Bassler; João B Xavier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Biocellion: accelerating computer simulation of multicellular biological system models.

Authors:  Seunghwa Kang; Simon Kahan; Jason McDermott; Nicholas Flann; Ilya Shmulevich
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Variable cell morphology approach for individual-based modeling of microbial communities.

Authors:  Tomas Storck; Cristian Picioreanu; Bernardino Virdis; Damien J Batstone
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Vibrio cholerae biofilm growth program and architecture revealed by single-cell live imaging.

Authors:  Jing Yan; Andrew G Sharo; Howard A Stone; Ned S Wingreen; Bonnie L Bassler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Understanding and Engineering Distributed Biochemical Pathways in Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Xinyun Cao; Joshua J Hamilton; Ophelia S Venturelli
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.