Literature DB >> 30593565

Structured environments fundamentally alter dynamics and stability of ecological communities.

Nick Vallespir Lowery1,2, Tristan Ursell3,2,4.   

Abstract

The dynamics and stability of ecological communities are intimately linked with the specific interactions-like cooperation or predation-between constituent species. In microbial communities, like those found in soils or the mammalian gut, physical anisotropies produced by fluid flow and chemical gradients impact community structure and ecological dynamics, even in structurally isotropic environments. Although natural communities existing in physically unstructured environments are rare, the role of environmental structure in determining community dynamics and stability remains poorly studied. To address this gap, we used modified Lotka-Volterra simulations of competitive microbial communities to characterize the effects of surface structure on community dynamics. We find that environmental structure has profound effects on communities, in a manner dependent on the specific pattern of interactions between community members. For two mutually competing species, eventual extinction of one competitor is effectively guaranteed in isotropic environments. However, addition of environmental structure enables long-term coexistence of both species via local "pinning" of competition interfaces, even when one species has a significant competitive advantage. In contrast, while three species competing in an intransitive loop (as in a game of rock-paper-scissors) coexist stably in isotropic environments, structural anisotropy disrupts the spatial patterns on which coexistence depends, causing chaotic population fluctuations and subsequent extinction cascades. These results indicate that the stability of microbial communities strongly depends on the structural environment in which they reside. Therefore, a more complete ecological understanding, including effective manipulation and interventions in natural communities of interest, must account for the physical structure of the environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anisotropic environments; interaction networks; microbial communities; microbial ecology; reaction−diffusion models

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30593565      PMCID: PMC6329963          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811887116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Influence of topology on bacterial social interaction.

Authors:  Sungsu Park; Peter M Wolanin; Emil A Yuzbashyan; Hai Lin; Nicholas C Darnton; Jeffry B Stock; Pascal Silberzan; Robert Austin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability.

Authors:  Katharine Z Coyte; Jonas Schluter; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Colonization, competition, and dispersal of pathogens in fluid flow networks.

Authors:  Albert Siryaporn; Minyoung Kevin Kim; Yi Shen; Howard A Stone; Zemer Gitai
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Cytoskeletal pinning controls phase separation in multicomponent lipid membranes.

Authors:  Senthil Arumugam; Eugene P Petrov; Petra Schwille
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Intransitivity is infrequent and fails to promote annual plant coexistence without pairwise niche differences.

Authors:  Oscar Godoy; Daniel B Stouffer; Nathan J B Kraft; Jonathan M Levine
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence.

Authors:  Laure Gallien; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Jonathan M Levine; Peter B Adler
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Quantitative Imaging of Gut Microbiota Spatial Organization.

Authors:  Kristen A Earle; Gabriel Billings; Michael Sigal; Joshua S Lichtman; Gunnar C Hansson; Joshua E Elias; Manuel R Amieva; Kerwyn Casey Huang; Justin L Sonnenburg
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 21.023

8.  Bacteria Use Collective Behavior to Generate Diverse Combat Strategies.

Authors:  Despoina A I Mavridou; Diego Gonzalez; Wook Kim; Stuart A West; Kevin R Foster
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Coexistence and Pattern Formation in Bacterial Mixtures with Contact-Dependent Killing.

Authors:  Liyang Xiong; Robert Cooper; Lev S Tsimring
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Spatial vs. non-spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics in a tumor growth model.

Authors:  Li You; Joel S Brown; Frank Thuijsman; Jessica J Cunningham; Robert A Gatenby; Jingsong Zhang; Kateřina Staňková
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Community coalescence: an eco-evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  Meaghan Castledine; Pawel Sierocinski; Daniel Padfield; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Diffusion-driven enhancement of the antibiotic resistance selection window.

Authors:  Ayari Fuentes-Hernández; Anastasia Hernández-Koutoucheva; Alán F Muñoz; Raúl Domínguez Palestino; Rafael Peña-Miller
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Priority effects in microbiome assembly.

Authors:  Reena Debray; Robin A Herbert; Alexander L Jaffe; Alexander Crits-Christoph; Mary E Power; Britt Koskella
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Strain Background, Species Frequency, and Environmental Conditions Are Important in Determining Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Population Dynamics and Species Coexistence.

Authors:  Selina Niggli; Rolf Kümmerli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Accumulation of dead cells from contact killing facilitates coexistence in bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Gabi Steinbach; Cristian Crisan; Siu Lung Ng; Brian K Hammer; Peter J Yunker
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Increasing growth rate slows adaptation when genotypes compete for diffusing resources.

Authors:  Jeremy M Chacón; Allison K Shaw; William R Harcombe
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Environmental connectivity controls diversity in soil microbial communities.

Authors:  Manupriyam Dubey; Noushin Hadadi; Serge Pelet; Nicolas Carraro; David R Johnson; Jan R van der Meer
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-04-22

8.  Structured environments foster competitor coexistence by manipulating interspecies interfaces.

Authors:  Tristan Ursell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 9.  The engineering of spatially linked microbial consortia - potential and perspectives.

Authors:  Sami Ben Said; Robin Tecon; Benedict Borer; Dani Or
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 9.740

10.  Spatial organization in microbial range expansion emerges from trophic dependencies and successful lineages.

Authors:  Benedict Borer; Davide Ciccarese; David Johnson; Dani Or
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.