John R Holroyd1, Sue Edyvean1. 1. 1 Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards (CRCE), Public Health England, Chilton , Didcot, Oxfordshire , UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review doses to patients undergoing cervical spine CT examinations in the UK. METHODS: A data collection form was developed and distributed to medical physicists and radiographers via e-mail distribution lists. The form requested details of CT scanners, exposure protocols and patient dose index information. RESULTS: Data were received for 73 scanners. It was seen that 97% of scanners used automatic exposure control, and 60% of scanners used an iterative reconstruction technique for cervical spine examinations. The majority of scans were taken at 120 kV. The average patient dose indicators in terms of CT dose index (CTDIvol) ranged from 3.5 to 39.7 mGy (mean value 16.7 mGy), and for the DLP, ranged from 87 to 1030 mGy cm (mean value 379 mGy cm) as quoted for the standard 32 cm phantom. CONCLUSION: The rounded third quartile value of the mean dose distributions from this study were a CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 20 mGy and a dose-length product of 440 mGy cm as quoted for a 32 cm body phantom. These are significantly higher than those in the 2011 Public Health England CT dose survey when adjusted for phantom size. It is suggested that the existing national diagnostic reference levels for cervical spine CT should be amended, both with the new values and also to quote according to the 32 cm phantom. Advances in knowledge: Proposed new national diagnostic reference levels are presented for cervical spine CT examinations.
OBJECTIVE: To review doses to patients undergoing cervical spine CT examinations in the UK. METHODS: A data collection form was developed and distributed to medical physicists and radiographers via e-mail distribution lists. The form requested details of CT scanners, exposure protocols and patient dose index information. RESULTS: Data were received for 73 scanners. It was seen that 97% of scanners used automatic exposure control, and 60% of scanners used an iterative reconstruction technique for cervical spine examinations. The majority of scans were taken at 120 kV. The average patient dose indicators in terms of CT dose index (CTDIvol) ranged from 3.5 to 39.7 mGy (mean value 16.7 mGy), and for the DLP, ranged from 87 to 1030 mGy cm (mean value 379 mGy cm) as quoted for the standard 32 cm phantom. CONCLUSION: The rounded third quartile value of the mean dose distributions from this study were a CT dose index (CTDIvol) of 20 mGy and a dose-length product of 440 mGy cm as quoted for a 32 cm body phantom. These are significantly higher than those in the 2011 Public Health England CT dose survey when adjusted for phantom size. It is suggested that the existing national diagnostic reference levels for cervical spine CT should be amended, both with the new values and also to quote according to the 32 cm phantom. Advances in knowledge: Proposed new national diagnostic reference levels are presented for cervical spine CT examinations.
Authors: Gareth R Iball; Natalie A Bebbington; Maria Burniston; Sue Edyvean; Louise Fraser; Peter Julyan; Nasreen Parkar; Tim Wood Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: E Vañó; D L Miller; C J Martin; M M Rehani; K Kang; M Rosenstein; P Ortiz-López; S Mattsson; R Padovani; A Rogers Journal: Ann ICRP Date: 2017-10
Authors: Denise Bos; Sophronia Yu; Jason Luong; Philip Chu; Yifei Wang; Andrew J Einstein; Jay Starkey; Bradley N Delman; Phuong-Anh T Duong; Marco Das; Sebastian Schindera; Allen R Goode; Fiona MacLeod; Axel Wetter; Rebecca Neill; Ryan K Lee; Jodi Roehm; James A Seibert; Luisa F Cervantes; Nima Kasraie; Pavlina Pike; Anokh Pahwa; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Rebecca Smith-Bindman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 5.315