OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence and significance of the use of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on patient dose in CT in Australia. METHODS: We examined survey data submitted to the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) National Diagnostic Reference Level Service (NDRLS) during 2013 and 2014. We compared median survey dose metrics with categorization by scan region and use of IR. RESULTS: The use of IR results in a reduction in volume CT dose index of between 17% and 44% and a reduction in dose-length product of between 14% and 34% depending on the specific scan region. The reduction was highly significant (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for all six scan regions included in the NDRLS. Overall, 69% (806/1167) of surveys included in the analysis used IR. CONCLUSION: The use of IR in CT is achieving dose savings of 20-30% in routine practice in Australia. IR appears to be widely used by participants in the ARPANSA NDRLS with approximately 70% of surveys submitted employing this technique. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study examines the impact of the use of IR on patient dose in CT on a national scale.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence and significance of the use of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on patient dose in CT in Australia. METHODS: We examined survey data submitted to the Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) National Diagnostic Reference Level Service (NDRLS) during 2013 and 2014. We compared median survey dose metrics with categorization by scan region and use of IR. RESULTS: The use of IR results in a reduction in volume CT dose index of between 17% and 44% and a reduction in dose-length product of between 14% and 34% depending on the specific scan region. The reduction was highly significant (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) for all six scan regions included in the NDRLS. Overall, 69% (806/1167) of surveys included in the analysis used IR. CONCLUSION: The use of IR in CT is achieving dose savings of 20-30% in routine practice in Australia. IR appears to be widely used by participants in the ARPANSA NDRLS with approximately 70% of surveys submitted employing this technique. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study examines the impact of the use of IR on patient dose in CT on a national scale.
Authors: Yoshiko Sagara; Amy K Hara; William Pavlicek; Alvin C Silva; Robert G Paden; Qing Wu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Avinash R Kambadakone; Naueen A Chaudhary; Gaurav S Desai; Deanna D Nguyen; Naveen M Kulkarni; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lee M Mitsumori; William P Shuman; Janet M Busey; Orpheus Kolokythas; Kent M Koprowicz Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-06-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jiang Hsieh; Paul E Licato; Synho Do; Homer H Pien; Michael A Blake Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Amy K Hara; Robert G Paden; Alvin C Silva; Jennifer L Kujak; Holly J Lawder; William Pavlicek Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.959