Literature DB >> 29465419

Assessment of PCXMC for patients with different body size in chest and abdominal x ray examinations: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

David Borrego1, Erin M Lowe, Cari M Kitahara, Choonsik Lee.   

Abstract

A PC Program for x ray Monte Carlo (PCXMC) has been used to calculate organ doses in patient dosimetry and for the exposure assessment in epidemiological studies of radiogenic health related risks. This study compared the dosimetry from using the built-in stylized phantoms in the PCXMC to that of a newer hybrid phantom library with improved anatomical realism. We simulated chest and abdominal x ray projections for 146 unique body size computational phantoms, 77 males and 69 females, with different combinations of height (125-180 cm) and weight (20-140 kg) using the built-in stylized phantoms in the PCXMC version 2.0.1.4 and the hybrid phantom library using the Monte Carlo N-particle eXtended transport code 2.7 (MCNPX). Unfortunately, it was not possible to incorporate the hybrid phantom library into the PCXMC. We compared 14 organ doses, including dose to the active bone marrow, to evaluate differences between the built-in stylized phantoms in the PCXMC and the hybrid phantoms (Cristy and Eckerman 1987 Technical Report ORNL/TM-8381/V1, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Eckerman and Ryman 1993 Technical Report 12 Oak Ridge, TN, Geyer et al 2014 Phys. Med. Biol. 59 5225-42). On average, organ doses calculated using the built-in stylized phantoms in the PCXMC were greater when compared to the hybrid phantoms. This is most prominent in AP abdominal exams by an average factor of 2.4-, 2.8-, and 2.8-fold for the 10-year-old, 15-year-old, and adult phantoms, respectively. For chest exams, organ doses are greater by an average factor of 1.1-, 1.4-, and 1.2-fold for the 10-year-old, 15-year-old, and adult phantoms, respectively. The PCXMX, due to its ease of use, is often selected to support dosimetry in epidemiological studies; however, it uses simplified models of the human anatomy that fail to account for variations in body morphometry for increasing weight. For epidemiological studies that use PCXMC dosimetry, associations between radiation-related disease risks and organ doses may be underestimated, and to a greater degree in pediatric, especially obese pediatric, compared to adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29465419      PMCID: PMC6376487          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab13e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Assessment of different patient-to-phantom matching criteria applied in Monte Carlo-based computed tomography dosimetry.

Authors:  Elliott J Stepusin; Daniel J Long; Emily L Marshall; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Effective dose delivered by conventional radiology to Aosta Valley population between 2002 and 2009.

Authors:  F Zenone; S Aimonetto; P Catuzzo; A Peruzzo Cornetto; P Marchisio; M Natrella; A M Rosanò; T Meloni; M Pasquino; S Tofani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Di Zhang; Hyun J Kim; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV.

Authors:  J M Boone; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The UF/NCI family of hybrid computational phantoms representing the current US population of male and female children, adolescents, and adults--application to CT dosimetry.

Authors:  Amy M Geyer; Shannon O'Reilly; Choonsik Lee; Daniel J Long; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Organ Doses From Diagnostic Medical Radiography-Trends Over Eight Decades (1930 to 2010).

Authors:  Dunstana R Melo; Donald L Miller; Lienard Chang; Brian Moroz; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  The impact of anthropometric patient-phantom matching on organ dose: a hybrid phantom study for fluoroscopy guided interventions.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Amy Geyer; David Borrego; Kayla Ficarrotta; Kevin Johnson; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance.

Authors:  Eliza B Geer; Wei Shen
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2009

9.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Survival adjusted cancer risks attributable to radiation exposure from cardiac catheterisations in children.

Authors:  Richard W Harbron; Claire-Louise Chapple; John J O'Sullivan; Kate E Best; Amy Berrington de González; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.994

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Ahmed Jibril Abdi; Bo Mussmann; Alistair Mackenzie; Oke Gerke; Gitte Maria Jørgensen; Thor Eriksen Bechsgaard; Janni Jensen; Lone Brunshøj Olsen; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.