| Literature DB >> 29456458 |
Christos Spanos1, Elaina M Maldonado1, Ciarán P Fisher1, Petchpailin Leenutaphong1, Ernesto Oviedo-Orta1, David Windridge1, Francisco J Salguero1, Alexandra Bermúdez-Fajardo1, Mark E Weeks2, Caroline Evans3, Bernard M Corfe4, Naila Rabbani5, Paul J Thornalley5, Michael H Miller6, Huan Wang6, John F Dillon6, Alberto Quaglia7, Anil Dhawan7, Emer Fitzpatrick7, J Bernadette Moore1,8.
Abstract
Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease worldwide. However, its molecular pathogenesis is incompletely characterized and clinical biomarkers remain scarce. The aims of these experiments were to identify and characterize liver protein alterations in an animal model of early, diet-related, liver injury and to assess novel candidate biomarkers in NAFLD patients.Entities:
Keywords: Glyoxalase; Methylglyoxal; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Proteomics; iTRAQ
Year: 2018 PMID: 29456458 PMCID: PMC5813374 DOI: 10.1186/s12953-018-0131-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteome Sci ISSN: 1477-5956 Impact factor: 2.480
Fig. 1iTRAQ-based proteomic analysis of murine liver membrane and cytosolic proteins.
a Venn analysis of proteins stringently identified and quantified by Scaffold_4.8.4 Q+, across biological replicates. Minimum thresholds for protein identification were set at 99% probability and at least 2 unique identified peptides. Protein probabilities were assigned by the Protein Prophet algorithm [57] and the calculated FDR for protein identification was < 0.05%. b Annotation of Gene Ontology (GO) category ‘cellular component ‘. c 91 cytosolic and 82 membranous proteins were identified significantly (P < 0.05) differentially expressed in all biological replicates, based on both randomized permutation and Kruskal-Wallis tests with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR for multiple testing corrections. 28 proteins were found in extracts from both cellular compartments. d Top functional annotation clusters, derived from multiple public sources of protein and gene annotation (eg GO, Uniprot, KEGG) utilizing the DAVID [23] knowledgebase, identified significantly enriched among the differentially expressed proteins. e Pathway topological analysis of the Reactome knowledgebase [25] illustrating pathway overrepresentation as corrected probability; intensity of scale indicates FDR. The lipid metabolism node is highlighted (in orange with blue writing) branching from overall metabolism node. f Dysregulated pathways branching from the lipid metabolism node. Box size is proportional to the entities in the Reactome pathway; the yellow band is proportional to the number of differentially expressed proteins that match against the query dataset; pathways over-represented are bolded with black text, shaded boxes represent pathways not found enriched. g Connectivity of enriched KEGG knowledgebase [27] pathways identified by Enrichr [26] analysis.
Fig. 2Hepatic pathology in high fat fed ApoE−/− mice. a Clustergram of gene names for the differentially expressed proteins found significantly overrepresented in associated MGI Mammalian Phenotype Ontology [61]. Data are shown for top 20 enriched phenotypes, with both phenotypes and differentially expressed proteins clustered according to the combined statistical score. b Immunohistochemical assay of L-FABP expression in animals fed diets for 12 weeks. c Immunoblotting and quantification of L-FABP expression normalized to COXIV. Data are mean ± SD; n = 3 animals/group. d Liver lipids were quantified by triacylglycerol assay. e Histology shows that liver sections from ApoE−/− HFD mice exhibit minimal to mild steatosis (arrows) at 12 and 16 weeks. Sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification: 100×
Fig. 3Altered GLO1 expression in animal model of early liver injury. a Median and interquartile range of 10 peptides for GLO1, quantified by iTRAQ-based proteomics. Whiskers are Tukey’s. b Immunohistochemical assay of GLO1 expression in WT and ApoE−/− animals fed a normal (ND) or high fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. c Immunoblotting and quantification showing GLO1 protein expression relative to COXIV. Data are mean ± SD, n = 3 animals/group
Fig. 4Dysregulation of GLO1 in response to lipid loading. HepG2 cells were treated with vehicle, palmitic acid (PA) or oleic acid (OA) for 24 h. a Intracellular lipid accumulation measured by Nile Red assay, b Immunoblotting and quantification of GLO1 expression relative to TUBA1A, c Cellular methylglyoxal (MG) levels, and d Medium MG levels from vehicle or fatty acid treated HepG2 cells. Data are mean ± SD, n = 3–4 independent experiments. e Acetylation of endogenous GLO1 immunoprecipitated (IP) from extracts of vehicle or OA treated HepG2 cells with a rabbit anti-GLO1 antibody and immunoblotted (IB) with rat anti-GLO1 and mouse anti-acetylated lysine. Top panel in red is GLO1 monomer (~21kD) and dimer (~ 45) detected in immunoprecitates of GLO1; less GLO1 dimer is immunoprecipitated from OA treated cells. Middle panel in green is detection of the GLO1 dimer with an anti-acetyl-lysine antibody, with less observed in the GLO1 immunoprecipitates of OA treated cells. Bottom panel is overlay. f Ubiquitination of endogenous GLO1. Top panel shows ubiquitin detection between 100-150kD in green, in immunoprecipitates of endogenous GLO1; addition of the proteasome inhibitor MG-132 increases GLO1 detection, particularly in OA treated cells. Middle panel shows GLO1 detection in red; very faint banding in the 150 K range only detectable in the eluates from OA and MG-132 co-treated cells. Bottom panel is overlay
Patient Characteristics1
|
| 62 |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47.4 ± 1.36 |
| Male (%) | 51 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 36.8 ± 0.96 |
| BMI < 25 (%) | 1.6 |
| BMI 25 ≤ x < 30 (%) | 17.7 |
| BMI ≥30 (%) | 80.6 |
| NAS2 (0–8) | 4 (3–5.25) |
| Steatosis (0–3) | 2 (1–3) |
| Inflammation (0–3) | 1 (0–1) |
| Ballooning (0–2) | 1 (0–2) |
| Fibrosis2 (0–4) | 1 (0–1.25) |
| MG-H1 (pmol/mg protein) | 0.902 ± 0.050 |
| sRAGE (pg/ml) | 565.6 ± 19.5 |
| ALT (IU) | 66.35 ± 6.82 |
| ALP (IU) | 85.61 ± 3.76 |
| Bilirubin (μmol/L) | 11.79 ± 1.4 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.08 ± 0.19 |
| TAG (mmol/L) | 2.07 ± 0.23 |
| T2D (%) | 19.4 |
| HBP (%) | 35.5 |
1Mean ± SEM except as noted; median with 25% - 75% percentile. Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; NAS, NAFLD activity score; MG-H1, methylglyoxal-hydroimidazolone 1; sRAGE, soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts; ALT, alanine aminotransferases; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TAG, triacylglycerol; T2D, type 2 diabetes; HBP, high blood pressure.
Correlation of MG-H1 with clinical features of NAFLD
| Variables |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| MG-H1 versus NAS | −0.205 | 0.1203 |
| MG-H1 versus inflammation | −0.204 | 0.1215 |
| MG-H1 versus ballooning | −0.351 | 0.0064 |
| MG-H1 versus ALT | −0.375 | 0.0034 |
| MG-H1 versus BMI | 0.520 | < 0.0001 |
Pearson or Spearman correlation was used to analyse the relationship between variables. Abbreviations: MG-H1, methylglyoxal-hydroimidazolone 1; NAS, NAFLD activity score; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; BMI, body mass index
Fig. 5Serum MG-H1 levels and altered GLO1 expression in NAFLD patients. a Correlation of MG-H1 with body mass index (BMI) in adult NAFLD patients (n = 59). b GLO1 immunohistochemistry in a non-NAFLD control case (panels 1,2,3) and in the biopsy specimen of a NAFLD patient (panels 4,5,6). 1: Low magnification reveals expression of GLO1 in hepatocyte cytoplasm without a particular zonal distribution. 2: Low magnification of a negative control section without the primary antibody. 3: High magnification shows cytoplasmic staining (asterisks) and focal nuclear staining (arrow) in hepatocytes. Not all hepatocytes appear to express GLO1 (black triangle). 4: Low magnification reveals bridging fibrosis and severe steatosis with retention of GLO1 staining in non-steatotic foci (arrows); 5: high magnification shows cytoplasmic staining of GLO1 in non-steatotic hepatocytes (black triangle). A peripheral staining rim is noted around large steatotic droplet, and expression of GLO1 in marginalised cytoplasm cannot be excluded (arrows). 6: High magnification reveals nuclear staining (arrows) of GLO1 in many, but not all (triangles), hepatocyte nuclei
Fig. 6Working model for post-translational regulation of GLO1 expression in NAFLD