Literature DB >> 26614855

Breast MRI, digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis: comparison of three methods for early detection of breast cancer.

Dragana Roganovic1, Dragana Djilas, Sasa Vujnovic, Dag Pavic, Dragan Stojanov.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and early detection is important for its successful treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of three methods for early detection of breast cancer: breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), digital mammography, and breast tomosynthesis in comparison to histopathology, as well as to investigate the intraindividual variability between these modalities. We included 57 breast lesions, each detected by three diagnostic modalities: digital mammography, breast MRI, and breast tomosynthesis, and subsequently confirmed by histopathology. Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was used for characterizing the lesions. One experienced radiologist interpreted all three diagnostic modalities. Twenty-nine of the breast lesions were malignant while 28 were benign. The sensitivity for digital mammography, breast MRI, and breast tomosynthesis, was 72.4%, 93.1%, and 100%, respectively; while the specificity was 46.4%, 60.7%, and 75%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis showed an overall diagnostic advantage of breast tomosynthesis over both breast MRI and digital mammography. The difference in performance between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography was significant (p <0.001), while the difference between breast tomosynthesis and breast MRI was not significant (p=0.20).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26614855      PMCID: PMC4690445          DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  15 in total

1.  Does the degree of background enhancement in breast MRI affect the detection and staging of breast cancer?

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Junichiro Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Digital mammography imaging: breast tomosynthesis and advanced applications.

Authors:  Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Patterns of enhancement on breast MR images: interpretation and imaging pitfalls.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Tao Wu; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Christine A Kogel; Helene M Nagy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls.

Authors:  Aneesa S Majid; Ellen Shaw de Paredes; Richard D Doherty; Neil R Sharma; Xavier Salvador
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Parenchymal texture analysis in digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer risk estimation: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Predrag R Bakic; Ann-Katherine Carton; Andrea B Troxel; Emily F Conant; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; K Schelfout; L Dijckmans; J C Van Der Auwera; J Weyler; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Panels of circulating microRNAs as potential diagnostic biomarkers for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thu H N Nguyen; Thanh T N Nguyen; Tran T M Nguyen; Le H M Nguyen; Luan H Huynh; Hoang N Phan; Hue T Nguyen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 4.624

Review 2.  Comparison of Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Approach.

Authors:  Temitope Emmanuel Komolafe; Cheng Zhang; Oluwatosin Atinuke Olagbaju; Gang Yuan; Qiang Du; Ming Li; Jian Zheng; Xiaodong Yang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Phantom-based study exploring the effects of different scatter correction approaches on the reconstructed images generated by contrast-enhanced stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Connor Puett; Christina Inscoe; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-02-01

4.  Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma of the Breast: A Case Report Unveiling Several Clinical and Histopathological Challenges.

Authors:  Tarek Aridi; Mohamad Fawwaz; Ahmad Kassab; Marwan Bahmad; Faisal Houcheimi; Mohamad Mshiek; Fouad Boulos; Ali Kanj; Ghassan Ramadan; Hisham F Bahmad; Najla Fakhruddin
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2018-07-12

5.  Use of ultrasound combined with magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of breast masses and fibroids.

Authors:  Wei Xiang; Zihui Huang; Chenhu Tang; Bo Shen; Qun Yu; Xiaohong Niu; Fanrong Meng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  A novel in ovo model to study cancer metastasis using chicken embryos and GFP expressing cancer cells.

Authors:  Robin Augustine; Hashim Alhussain; Anwarul Hasan; Mohamed Badie Ahmed; Huseyin C Yalcin; Ala-Eddin Al Moustafa
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  The effectiveness of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in dense breasts.

Authors:  Wojciech Rudnicki; Tomasz Piegza; Natalia Rozum-Liszewska; Mateusz Górski; Tadeusz J Popiela; Pawel Basta; Sylwia Heinze; Elzbieta Luczynska
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 8.  Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Lulu Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Perspective on Cancer Therapeutics Utilizing Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Keun-Yeong Jeong; Eun Kyung Kim; Min Hee Park; Hwan Mook Kim
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-11

10.  A five-miRNA panel in plasma was identified for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Minghui Li; Xuan Zou; Tiansong Xia; Tongshan Wang; Ping Liu; Xin Zhou; Shui Wang; Wei Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.