Wendy DeMartini1, Constance Lehman, Savannah Partridge. 1. University of Washington Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. wdemarti@u.washington.edu <wdemarti@u.washington.edu>
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Breast MRI is an important new tool in the imaging armamentarium for the detection and characterization of breast carcinoma. Understanding the evidence-supported benefits and potential harms of breast MRI is important to ensure the appropriate utilization of this medical resource. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reviews the clinical settings in which MRI for breast cancer assessment has been shown to be advantageous. The evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and the impact of this imaging tool on clinical outcomes are described. Novel breast MRI techniques which may lead to future improvements in performance are discussed. RESULTS: Breast MRI has been shown in multiple studies to be advantageous for screening patients at high risk, evaluating patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis, monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluating patients with metastatic axillary adenocarcinoma and unknown primary site. Among the limitations of MRI are its high cost and modest specificity resulting in false positive examinations. CONCLUSIONS: When used in evidence-supported clinical settings, the high sensitivity of MRI results in earlier cancer detection or greater accuracy of detection compared to existing tests for breast carcinoma. Further scientific endeavors are crucial to optimize the future performance and application of breast MRI.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Breast MRI is an important new tool in the imaging armamentarium for the detection and characterization of breast carcinoma. Understanding the evidence-supported benefits and potential harms of breast MRI is important to ensure the appropriate utilization of this medical resource. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This article reviews the clinical settings in which MRI for breast cancer assessment has been shown to be advantageous. The evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and the impact of this imaging tool on clinical outcomes are described. Novel breast MRI techniques which may lead to future improvements in performance are discussed. RESULTS: Breast MRI has been shown in multiple studies to be advantageous for screening patients at high risk, evaluating patients with a new breast cancer diagnosis, monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluating patients with metastatic axillary adenocarcinoma and unknown primary site. Among the limitations of MRI are its high cost and modest specificity resulting in false positive examinations. CONCLUSIONS: When used in evidence-supported clinical settings, the high sensitivity of MRI results in earlier cancer detection or greater accuracy of detection compared to existing tests for breast carcinoma. Further scientific endeavors are crucial to optimize the future performance and application of breast MRI.
Authors: Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Carolyn R T Stoll; Susan Fowler; Graham A Colditz; Donna B Jeffe; Julie A Margenthaler Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Christian Herold; A Reichelt; L H Stieglitz; S Dettmer; K Knobloch; J Lotz; P M Vogt Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Safia Cheeney; Habib Rahbar; Brian N Dontchos; Sara H Javid; Mara H Rendi; Savannah C Partridge Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Sheye O Aliu; Ella F Jones; Ania Azziz; John Kornak; Lisa J Wilmes; David C Newitt; Sachiko A Suzuki; Catherine Klifa; Jessica Gibbs; Evelyn C Proctor; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: Transl Oncol Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.243
Authors: Dorota J Wisner; Nathan Rogers; Vibhas S Deshpande; David N Newitt; Gerhard A Laub; David A Porter; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-11-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Karen M Stone; Roberta M Strigel; Wendy B DeMartini; Sue Peacock; Constance D Lehman Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2014-07-04 Impact factor: 3.173