Ahmet Altıntaş1, Yakup Yeğin2, Mustafa Çelik2, Tevfik Sözen3, Gürkan Kayabaşoğlu4, Ömer Taşkın Yücel3, Fazıl Apaydın5. 1. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih Medikal Park Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 2. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. 4. Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey. 5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ege University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess approaches and experiences of otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic and nasal surgery. METHODS: In total, 234 surgeons (191 males and 43 females; average age, 37.22±8.4 years; age range, 26-63 years) were included. All participants were given a questionnaire comprising 22 multiple choice and closed-ended questions. All responses to the questionnaires were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 234 participants, 42 (17.9%) were residents and 192 (82.1%) were specialists in otorhinolaryngology. The most challenging cases in rhinoplasty were crooked nose (33.8%), ideal nasal dorsum (18.8%), revision cases (13.2%), and skin deformities (11.1%). The photodocumentation rate by surgeons before and after procedures of facial plastic surgery was 86.3%, whereas the intraoperative photodocumentation rate by surgeons was 47%. The most common facial plastic surgery procedures other than rhinoplasty were otoplasty (68.4%), filler-Botox-fat injections (20.5%), and mentoplasty (18.4%). CONCLUSION: This survey study is quite important because it assesses approaches of otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic surgery. Although this study provides more valuable data for determining the current status, further studies with larger number of surgeons are required.
OBJECTIVE: To assess approaches and experiences of otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic and nasal surgery. METHODS: In total, 234 surgeons (191 males and 43 females; average age, 37.22±8.4 years; age range, 26-63 years) were included. All participants were given a questionnaire comprising 22 multiple choice and closed-ended questions. All responses to the questionnaires were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 234 participants, 42 (17.9%) were residents and 192 (82.1%) were specialists in otorhinolaryngology. The most challenging cases in rhinoplasty were crooked nose (33.8%), ideal nasal dorsum (18.8%), revision cases (13.2%), and skin deformities (11.1%). The photodocumentation rate by surgeons before and after procedures of facial plastic surgery was 86.3%, whereas the intraoperative photodocumentation rate by surgeons was 47%. The most common facial plastic surgery procedures other than rhinoplasty were otoplasty (68.4%), filler-Botox-fat injections (20.5%), and mentoplasty (18.4%). CONCLUSION: This survey study is quite important because it assesses approaches of otorhinolaryngologists in facial plastic surgery. Although this study provides more valuable data for determining the current status, further studies with larger number of surgeons are required.