Literature DB >> 21181180

The importance of metric view for photodocumentation of facial reconstructive surgery: a single blinded survey.

Görkem Eskiizmir1, Beyhan Ozyurt.   

Abstract

Photodocumentation is an essential part of dermatooncology and reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this study is to suggest an imaging technique named metric view (photograph of the lesion with a surgical ruler) and to assess the accuracy of different views. Frontal, close-up and metric views were taken from the lesions of ten different cases. All the photographs were showed to 30 medical professionals and a prediction about the size of the lesion was requested individually. The relationship between the prediction values for three views and the exact size of the lesions were statistically analysed. The precise prediction of the exact size was only achieved in metric view of one case. In addition, the most approximate prediction values were obtained in metric views. The statistical analysis demonstrated that there was no statistically significant difference between the prediction values for metric view and exact size of the lesions in half of the cases. In contrast, statistically significant differences were detected in almost all of the prediction values for frontal and close-up views. Frontal and close-up views are not adequate to represent the size of the lesions. Metric view may enable a rational solution for a better representation.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21181180     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1466-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  7 in total

1.  Guidelines for standard photography in plastic surgery.

Authors:  R Yavuzer; S Smirnes; I T Jackson
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.539

2.  Standardized photography in facial plastic surgery: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  D G Becker; M E Tardy
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.446

3.  Practical clinical dermatology: photography with professional results.

Authors:  D P Goodwin; T Policano; T O McMeekin
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 11.527

4.  Rhinoplasty: the light reflexes.

Authors:  R K Daniel; J Hodgson; V S Lambros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  The early history of clinical photography for burns, plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  A F Wallace
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  1985-10

6.  Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography.

Authors:  David J Archibald; Matthew L Carlson; Oren Friedman
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.918

7.  Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography in facial plastic surgery patients.

Authors:  Doron D Sommer; Martyn Mendelsohn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.730

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Fundamentals of Enterprise Photodocumentation: Connecting the Clinical and Technical-a Review of Key Concepts.

Authors:  Cheryl A Petersilge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Assessment of Approaches of Otorhinolaryngologists in Facial Plastic and Nasal Surgery: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Ahmet Altıntaş; Yakup Yeğin; Mustafa Çelik; Tevfik Sözen; Gürkan Kayabaşoğlu; Ömer Taşkın Yücel; Fazıl Apaydın
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.