Literature DB >> 19554169

Predicting the results of rhinoplasty before surgery: Easy noses versus difficult noses.

Nabil Fanous1, Valérie Julie Brousseau, Naznin Karsan, Amanda Fanous.   

Abstract

A major problem for many rhinoplastic surgeons is the ability to predict, before surgery, the difficulty of the procedure (whether the rhinoplasties will be technically easy or technically difficult to perform) and the success rate of the result (whether the rhinoplasty will likely give good results or poor ones).The present paper outlines a systematic approach to nasal analysis, allowing the surgeon to consistently estimate, before surgery, the degree of technical difficulty of each rhinoplasty, as well as predicting its future result in terms of patient satisfaction. This preoperative evaluation is based on the analysis of the skin texture and the osteocartilagenous framework on lateral and frontal views. It allows for the nose to be classified as green (easy), yellow (moderate) or red (difficult), depending on two factors: the degree of surgical difficulty and the expected patient's satisfaction with the result.The essence of the present paper is to introduce a simple, systematic approach to assist the novice rhinoplastic surgeon to assess the complexity, the risks and the expected outcome of a rhinoplasty in the preoperative period, rather than postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Difficult; Easy; Predicting results; Rhinoplasty

Year:  2008        PMID: 19554169      PMCID: PMC2691557          DOI: 10.1177/229255030801600209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Plast Surg        ISSN: 1195-2199


  11 in total

1.  Esthetics in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  L Bernstein
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Treatment of the posttraumatic and postrhinoplasty crooked nose.

Authors:  Scott B Roofe; Craig S Murakami
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  Psychodynamic and esthetic motivations for plastic surgery.

Authors:  G HILL; A G SILVER
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1950 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Screening patients for nasal plastic operations; some sociologic and psychiatric considerations.

Authors:  F C MACGREGOR; B SCHAFFNER
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1950 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.312

5.  Geography of the nose: a morphometric study.

Authors:  L G Farkas; J C Kolar; I R Munro
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 6.  Misadventures in nasal tip surgery. Analysis and repair.

Authors:  M E Tardy; E Y Cheng; V Jernstrom
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Transdomal suture refinement of the nasal tip: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  M E Tardy; B S Patt; M A Walter
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.446

8.  A reasoned approach to nasal base surgery.

Authors:  J R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1984-06

Review 9.  Body dysmorphic disorder: the distress of imagined ugliness.

Authors:  K A Phillips
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Anatomy of the nasal hump.

Authors:  P McKinney; P Johnson; J Walloch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  2 in total

1.  A practical method for assessing nasal skin quality.

Authors:  M Haluk Ozkul; Didem Gamze Kocagöz; Hasan Huseyin Balıkcı; Ayşegül Verim; Husamettin Yaşar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Assessment of Approaches of Otorhinolaryngologists in Facial Plastic and Nasal Surgery: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Ahmet Altıntaş; Yakup Yeğin; Mustafa Çelik; Tevfik Sözen; Gürkan Kayabaşoğlu; Ömer Taşkın Yücel; Fazıl Apaydın
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.