Literature DB >> 20855769

Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.

Kathy Yu1, Alyn Kim, Steven J Pearlman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the subjective aesthetic and functional concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty and to compare them with objective deformities found on evaluation by the surgeon.
METHODS: This prospective study used a questionnaire to systematically target the aesthetic and functional concerns of 104 consecutive patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Analysis of the subjective data revealed the frequency of each concern, which was then compared with objective deformities found on evaluation by the surgeon.
RESULTS: The most common patient and surgeon aesthetic concerns were (1) tip asymmetry, (2) crooked middle third of the nose, and (3) upper third irregularity. A mean of 79% of patient concerns were also reported by the surgeon. Of the 64 patients describing subjective nasal obstruction, 60 (94%) had objective physical findings related to obstruction. The 3 most troublesome patient concerns were (1) tip asymmetry, (2) difficulty breathing or nasal blockage, and (3) crooked middle third of the nose.
CONCLUSIONS: Tip asymmetry was the most common deformity noted. Symptomatic nasal obstruction was the second most frequent reason for seeking revision rhinoplasty. Differences in patient and surgeon findings were largely due to differences in assessment skills and should be addressed by thorough explanation of nasal aesthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20855769     DOI: 10.1001/archfacial.2010.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 1521-2491


  13 in total

1.  The role of three-dimensional CT in the evaluation of nasal structures and anomalies.

Authors:  Gennaro Graviero; Luca Guastini; Renzo Mora; Giovanni Salzano; Francesco Antonio Salzano
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A Finite Element Model to Simulate Formation of the Inverted-V Deformity.

Authors:  Tjoson Tjoa; Cyrus T Manuel; Ryan P Leary; Rani Harb; Dmitriy E Protsenko; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.611

3.  Rhinoplasty from a rhinologist's perspective: need for recognition of associated sinonasal conditions.

Authors:  Valerie A Picavet; Jente Grietens; Mark Jorissen; Peter W Hellings
Journal:  Am J Rhinol Allergy       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.467

4.  Turbinate reduction with complete preservation of mucosa and submucosa during rhinoplasty.

Authors:  M Rudes; F Schwan; F Klass; H G Gassner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Secondary Rhinoplasty: Aesthetic and Functional Concerns.

Authors:  Shahriar Loghmani; Alireza Loghmani; Fatemeh Maraki
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 0.947

6.  Assessment of Approaches of Otorhinolaryngologists in Facial Plastic and Nasal Surgery: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Ahmet Altıntaş; Yakup Yeğin; Mustafa Çelik; Tevfik Sözen; Gürkan Kayabaşoğlu; Ömer Taşkın Yücel; Fazıl Apaydın
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-14

Review 7.  Rhinoplasty Complications and Reoperations: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paulo Fernando Tormin Borges Crosara; Flávio Barbosa Nunes; Danilo Santana Rodrigues; Ana Rosa Pimentel Figueiredo; Helena Maria Gonçalves Becker; Celso Goncalves Becker; Roberto Eustáquio Santos Guimarães
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-09-22

8.  A Comparison of Doctor/Patient Satisfaction with Aesthetic Outcomes of Rhinoplasty: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Fatemeh Rezaei; Farzad Rezaei; Hoshyar Abbasi; Hamed Moradi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

9.  Prevalence of considering revision rhinoplasty in Saudi patients and its associated factors.

Authors:  Najlaa Abdulrahman Alsubeeh; Mayar Abdulsalam AlSaqr; Mohammed Alkarzae; Badi Aldosari
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  Association Between Mental Health Status and Patient Satisfaction With the Functional Outcomes of Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Erika Strazdins; Yu Feng Nie; Raziqah Ramli; Tom Palesy; Jenna M Christensen; Raquel Alvarado; George N Marcells; Richard J Harvey
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.