Literature DB >> 15220560

Pitfalls of nonstandardized photography in facial plastic surgery patients.

Doron D Sommer1, Martyn Mendelsohn.   

Abstract

The authors tested the hypothesis that certain maneuvers (neck flexion/extension and head protrusion/retrusion) alter the appearance of the submental area, jawline, and melolabial groove. They used a questionnaire survey of 20 naïve judges who assessed a standardized photograph album of three subjects. The subjects' faces (frontal and lateral views) were photographed in neutral, neck flexion/extension, and head protrusion/retrusion positions. High Kendall coefficients of correlation were observed in 10 of 12 questions evaluating an improvement in jawline definition with neck extension or head protrusion, as well as in 11 of 12 questions assessing decreased submental soft tissue. All questions relating to the melolabial groove had a correlation coefficient of less than 0.70. Small changes in patient positioning during photodocumentation for facial plastic surgical procedures can cause dramatic changes in the appearance of certain parameters. Standardizing patient positioning for preoperative and postoperative photographs is imperative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15220560     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000127791.31526.e2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  The importance of metric view for photodocumentation of facial reconstructive surgery: a single blinded survey.

Authors:  Görkem Eskiizmir; Beyhan Ozyurt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Fundamentals of Enterprise Photodocumentation: Connecting the Clinical and Technical-a Review of Key Concepts.

Authors:  Cheryl A Petersilge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A portable mirror stand for clinical facial photo documentation.

Authors:  Laureen Supit; Theddeus Oh Prasetyono
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

4.  Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Erin M Wolfe; Guillermo Najera-Sweeney; Zoe P Berman; Allyson R Alfonso; Gustave K Diep; Elie P Ramly; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-14

5.  Assessment of Approaches of Otorhinolaryngologists in Facial Plastic and Nasal Surgery: A Survey Study.

Authors:  Ahmet Altıntaş; Yakup Yeğin; Mustafa Çelik; Tevfik Sözen; Gürkan Kayabaşoğlu; Ömer Taşkın Yücel; Fazıl Apaydın
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-14

6.  Clinical Photography for Periorbital and Facial Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Aparna Santhanam
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  The Influence of Sagittal Head Tilt on Periorbital Appearance: Implications for Clinical Photography and the Evaluation of Postoperative Results.

Authors:  Elbert E Vaca; Jonathan T Bricker; Lauren M Mioton; Steven Fagien; Mohammed S Alghoul
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2021-10-30

8.  #TheUglyTruth? A Qualitative Evaluation of Outcomes Photography on Instagram: Introducing the SEPIA Scoring System.

Authors:  Danny J Soares; Haley N von Haven; Christina H Yi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-08-19

9.  Medical photography using mobile devices.

Authors:  Timothy Zoltie; Sigrid Blome-Eberwein; Sarah Forbes; Mike Theaker; Walayat Hussain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-08-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.