Literature DB >> 32831423

Estimating Contextual Effects from Ego Network Data.

Jeffrey A Smith1, G Robin Gauthier1.   

Abstract

Network concepts are often used to characterize the features of a social context. For example, past work has asked if individuals in more socially cohesive neighborhoods have better mental health outcomes. Despite the ubiquity of use, it is relatively rare for contextual studies to employ the methods of network analysis. This is the case, in part, because network data are difficult to collect, requiring information on all ties between all actors. This paper asks whether it is possible to avoid such heavy data collection while still retaining the best features of a contextual-network study. The basic idea is to apply network sampling to the problem of contextual models, where one uses sampled ego network data to infer the network features of each context, and then uses the inferred network features as second-level predictors in a hierarchical linear model. We test the validity of this idea in the case of network cohesion. Using two complete datasets as a test, we find that ego network data are sufficient to capture the relationship between cohesion and important outcomes, like attachment and deviance. The hope, going forward, is that researchers will find it easier to incorporate holistic network measures into traditional regression models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Cohesion; Ego Networks; Exponential Random Graph Models; Hierarchical Linear Models; Network Sampling

Year:  2020        PMID: 32831423      PMCID: PMC7434046          DOI: 10.1177/0081175020922879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  19 in total

1.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy.

Authors:  R J Sampson; S W Raudenbush; F Earls
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  INFERENCE FOR SOCIAL NETWORK MODELS FROM EGOCENTRICALLY SAMPLED DATA, WITH APPLICATION TO UNDERSTANDING PERSISTENT RACIAL DISPARITIES IN HIV PREVALENCE IN THE US.

Authors:  Pavel N Krivitsky; Martina Morris
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Network Effects in Blau Space: Imputing Social Context from Survey Data.

Authors:  Miller McPherson; Jeffrey A Smith
Journal:  Socius       Date:  2019-08-20

4.  Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure.

Authors:  Daniel A McFarland; James Moody; David Diehl; Jeffrey A Smith; Reuben J Thomas
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  Adjusting for Network Size and Composition Effects in Exponential-Family Random Graph Models.

Authors:  Pavel N Krivitsky; Mark S Handcock; Martina Morris
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2011-07

6.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

7.  Random errors in egocentric networks.

Authors:  Zack W Almquist
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2012-10

8.  Putting people into place.

Authors:  Barbara Entwisle
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2007-11

9.  NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Jacob C Fisher; Nalyn Siripong; Kahina Abdesselam; Shawn Bauldry
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

10.  Perceived group cohesion versus actual social structure: A study using social network analysis of egocentric Facebook networks.

Authors:  Marina Tulin; Thomas V Pollet; Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock
Journal:  Soc Sci Res       Date:  2018-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.