Literature DB >> 26180577

Estimating hidden population size using Respondent-Driven Sampling data.

Mark S Handcock1, Krista J Gile2, Corinne M Mar3.   

Abstract

Respondent-Driven Sampling (RDS) is n approach to sampling design and inference in hard-to-reach human populations. It is often used in situations where the target population is rare and/or stigmatized in the larger population, so that it is prohibitively expensive to contact them through the available frames. Common examples include injecting drug users, men who have sex with men, and female sex workers. Most analysis of RDS data has focused on estimating aggregate characteristics, such as disease prevalence. However, RDS is often conducted in settings where the population size is unknown and of great independent interest. This paper presents an approach to estimating the size of a target population based on data collected through RDS. The proposed approach uses a successive sampling approximation to RDS to leverage information in the ordered sequence of observed personal network sizes. The inference uses the Bayesian framework, allowing for the incorporation of prior knowledge. A flexible class of priors for the population size is used that aids elicitation. An extensive simulation study provides insight into the performance of the method for estimating population size under a broad range of conditions. A further study shows the approach also improves estimation of aggregate characteristics. Finally, the method demonstrates sensible results when used to estimate the size of known networked populations from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, and when used to estimate the size of a hard-to-reach population at high risk for HIV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hard-to-reach population sampling; model-based survey sampling; network sampling; social networks; successive sampling

Year:  2014        PMID: 26180577      PMCID: PMC4500293          DOI: 10.1214/14-EJS923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron J Stat        ISSN: 1935-7524            Impact factor:   1.125


  21 in total

1.  An assessment of preferential attachment as a mechanism for human sexual network formation.

Authors:  James Holland Jones; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Likelihood-based inference for stochastic models of sexual network formation.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; James Holland Jones
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  MODELING SOCIAL NETWORKS FROM SAMPLED DATA.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; Krista J Gile
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Understanding the AIDS pandemic.

Authors:  R M Anderson; R M May
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.142

5.  Interval estimates for epidemic thresholds in two-sex network models.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; James Holland Jones
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Implementation challenges to using respondent-driven sampling methodology for HIV biological and behavioral surveillance: field experiences in international settings.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Mohsen Malekinejad; Carl Kendall; Irene M Iuppa; George W Rutherford
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2008-06-06

7.  How many men who have sex with men and female sex workers live in El Salvador? Using respondent-driven sampling and capture-recapture to estimate population sizes.

Authors:  G Paz-Bailey; J O Jacobson; M E Guardado; F M Hernandez; A I Nieto; M Estrada; J Creswell
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling data.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; Krista J Gile; Corinne M Mar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Estimates of HIV incidence among drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia: continued growth of a rapidly expanding epidemic.

Authors:  Linda M Niccolai; Sergei V Verevochkin; Olga V Toussova; Edward White; Russell Barbour; Andrei P Kozlov; Robert Heimer
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Assessing network scale-up estimates for groups most at risk of HIV/AIDS: evidence from a multiple-method study of heavy drug users in Curitiba, Brazil.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Dimitri Fazito; Neilane Bertoni; Alexandre H Abdo; Maeve B Mello; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  23 in total

1.  Population Size Estimation Using Multiple Respondent-Driven Sampling Surveys.

Authors:  Brian J Kim; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2019-12-07

2.  Estimating the size of populations at high risk for HIV using respondent-driven sampling data.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; Krista J Gile; Corinne M Mar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  If You Are Not Counted, You Don't Count: Estimating the Number of African-American Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Francisco Using a Novel Bayesian Approach.

Authors:  Paul Wesson; Mark S Handcock; Willi McFarland; H Fisher Raymond
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 4.  Estimating the size of key populations: current status and future possibilities.

Authors:  Abu S Abdul-Quader; Andrew L Baughman; Wolfgang Hladik
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

6.  Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Using Respondent-driven Sampling Data: Case Examples from Morocco.

Authors:  Lisa G Johnston; Katherine R McLaughlin; Houssine El Rhilani; Amina Latifi; Abdalla Toufik; Aziza Bennani; Kamal Alami; Boutaina Elomari; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Diagnostics for Respondent-driven Sampling.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Lisa G Johnston; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 2.483

8.  One-step estimation of networked population size: Respondent-driven capture-recapture with anonymity.

Authors:  Bilal Khan; Hsuan-Wei Lee; Ian Fellows; Kirk Dombrowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Estimating the burden of the opioid epidemic for adults and adolescents in Ohio counties.

Authors:  David Kline; Staci A Hepler
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Estimating the size of key populations at higher risk of HIV infection: a summary of experiences and lessons presented during a technical meeting on size estimation among key populations in Asian countries.

Authors:  Dongbao Yu; Jesus Maria Garcia Calleja; Jinkou Zhao; Amala Reddy; Nicole Seguy
Journal:  Western Pac Surveill Response J       Date:  2014-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.