Literature DB >> 20731500

Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.

Sharad Goel1, Winter Mason, Duncan J Watts.   

Abstract

It is often asserted that friends and acquaintances have more similar beliefs and attitudes than do strangers; yet empirical studies disagree over exactly how much diversity of opinion exists within local social networks and, relatedly, how much awareness individuals have of their neighbors' views. This article reports results from a network survey, conducted on the Facebook social networking platform, in which participants were asked about their own political attitudes, as well as their beliefs about their friends' attitudes. Although considerable attitude similarity exists among friends, the results show that friends disagree more than they think they do. In particular, friends are typically unaware of their disagreements, even when they say they discuss the topic, suggesting that discussion is not the primary means by which friends infer each other's views on particular issues. Rather, it appears that respondents infer opinions in part by relying on stereotypes of their friends and in part by projecting their own views. The resulting gap between real and perceived agreement may have implications for the dynamics of political polarization and theories of social influence in general.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20731500     DOI: 10.1037/a0020697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  13 in total

1.  Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Game of Contacts: Estimating the Social Visibility of Groups.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Maeve B Mello; Alexandre H Abdo; Neilane Bertoni; Dimitri Fazito; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2011-01-01

3.  How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting.

Authors:  Petter Törnberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  The Associations of Eating-related Attitudinal Balance with Psychological Well-being and Eating Behaviors.

Authors:  Paul T Fuglestad; Meg Bruening; Dan J Graham; Marla E Eisenberg; Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2013

5.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

Review 6.  Human social sensing is an untapped resource for computational social science.

Authors:  Mirta Galesic; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Jonas Dalege; Scott L Feld; Frauke Kreuter; Henrik Olsson; Drazen Prelec; Daniel L Stein; Tamara van der Does
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Polarized information ecosystems can reorganize social networks via information cascades.

Authors:  Christopher K Tokita; Andrew M Guess; Corina E Tarnita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  Secrets and Misperceptions: The Creation of Self-Fulfilling Illusions.

Authors:  Sarah K Cowan
Journal:  Sociol Sci       Date:  2014-11

9.  Wiki surveys: open and quantifiable social data collection.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Karen E C Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Quantity Versus Quality: A Survey Experiment to Improve the Network Scale-up Method.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Aline Umubyeyi; Mary Mahy; Wolfgang Hladik; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.