Literature DB >> 29371476

Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions for Women with Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Ontario, Canada.

Sofia Torres1, Maureen Trudeau1, Sonal Gandhi1, Ellen Warner1, Sunil Verma2, Kathleen I Pritchard1, Teresa Petrella1, Mark Hew-Shue1, Calvin Chao3, Andrea Eisen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) assay is only reimbursed in Ontario for node-negative and micrometastatic node-positive (N+) early-stage breast cancer (EBC). We carried out a prospective study to evaluate the impact of the assay on treatment decisions for women with N+ EBC. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: Women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative EBC and one to three positive axillary lymph nodes, who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to hormonal treatment, but in whom the benefit of chemotherapy was uncertain, were eligible. The primary objective was to characterize how the results of the RS assay affected physicians' recommendations for adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were to characterize changes in the physicians' and patients' level of confidence in treatment recommendations, to determine whether the results of the RS assay affected patients' treatment preferences, and to determine the final treatment administered.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were recruited; the mean age was 61. RS was <18 in 55%, between 18 and 30 in 36%, and ≥31 in 9% of patients. Treatment recommendations changed in 36% of all evaluable patients. The most significant change was in the group with a low RS. Physicians' and patients' confidence in treatment recommendations increased in 49% and 54% of cases, respectively. Upfront chemotherapy was recommended to 79% of patients before the assay; 42% ultimately received chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The RS assay resulted in a substantial decrease in the number of patients who received chemotherapy and in an increase in physicians' and patients' confidence in the adjuvant treatment recommendations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This is the first decision impact study to include exclusively women with ER-positive, HER2-negative, early-stage breast cancer with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, a population typically treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. This study provides evidence that, in these patients, the Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score assay influences systemic treatment decisions. Most of the changes in treatment recommendation resulted in withdrawal of chemotherapy or change in recommendation from a chemotherapy regimen with anthracyclines to a taxane-only regimen. If prospective studies confirm that these decisions result in good outcomes, a reduction in the use of chemotherapy might result in pharmacoeconomic savings. © AlphaMed Press 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Breast cancer; Node positive; Recurrence score

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29371476      PMCID: PMC6058344          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015.

Authors:  A S Coates; E P Winer; A Goldhirsch; R D Gelber; M Gnant; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The impact of a genomic assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment recommendations in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard H de Boer; Caroline Baker; David Speakman; Calvin Y Chao; Carl Yoshizawa; G Bruce Mann
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 4.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Fatima Cardoso; Laura J van't Veer; Jan Bogaerts; Leen Slaets; Giuseppe Viale; Suzette Delaloge; Jean-Yves Pierga; Etienne Brain; Sylvain Causeret; Mauro DeLorenzi; Annuska M Glas; Vassilis Golfinopoulos; Theodora Goulioti; Susan Knox; Erika Matos; Bart Meulemans; Peter A Neijenhuis; Ulrike Nitz; Rodolfo Passalacqua; Peter Ravdin; Isabel T Rubio; Mahasti Saghatchian; Tineke J Smilde; Christos Sotiriou; Lisette Stork; Carolyn Straehle; Geraldine Thomas; Alastair M Thompson; Jacobus M van der Hoeven; Peter Vuylsteke; René Bernards; Konstantinos Tryfonidis; Emiel Rutgers; Martine Piccart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.

Authors:  Mark N Levine; Jim A Julian; Philippe L Bedard; Andrea Eisen; Maureen E Trudeau; Brian Higgins; Louise Bordeleau; Kathleen I Pritchard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Selection of Optimal Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Negative and Adjuvant Targeted Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancers: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Neelima Denduluri; Mark R Somerfield; Andrea Eisen; Jamie N Holloway; Arti Hurria; Tari A King; Gary H Lyman; Ann H Partridge; Melinda L Telli; Maureen E Trudeau; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using the 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study.

Authors:  Mitch Dowsett; Jack Cuzick; Christopher Wale; John Forbes; Elizabeth A Mallon; Janine Salter; Emma Quinn; Anita Dunbier; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Roberto Bugarini; Frederick L Baehner; Steven Shak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials.

Authors:  R Peto; C Davies; J Godwin; R Gray; H C Pan; M Clarke; D Cutter; S Darby; P McGale; C Taylor; Y C Wang; J Bergh; A Di Leo; K Albain; S Swain; M Piccart; K Pritchard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Breast-cancer-specific mortality in patients treated based on the 21-gene assay: a SEER population-based study.

Authors:  Valentina I Petkov; Dave P Miller; Nadia Howlader; Nathan Gliner; Will Howe; Nicola Schussler; Kathleen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Rosemary Cress; Dennis Deapen; Sally L Glaser; Brenda Y Hernandez; Charles F Lynch; Lloyd Mueller; Ann G Schwartz; Stephen M Schwartz; Antoinette Stroup; Carol Sweeney; Thomas C Tucker; Kevin C Ward; Charles Wiggins; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lynne Penberthy; Steven Shak
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-08
View more
  10 in total

1.  Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  L Masucci; S Torres; A Eisen; M Trudeau; I Tyono; H Saunders; K W Chan; W Isaranuwatchai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Real-world analysis of clinical and economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) testing in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) in Ireland.

Authors:  L M McSorley; M Tharmabala; F Al Rahbi; K McSorley; S Chew; D Evoy; J G Geraghty; R S Prichard; J Rothwell; D P McCartan; E W McDermott; M Keane; M J Kennedy; S O'Reilly; S J Millen; J P Crown; L M Smyth; C M Kelly; C M Quinn; J M Walshe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay on chemotherapy decision making and outcomes for breast cancer patients with four or more positive lymph nodes.

Authors:  Qing-Hong Zhang; Wen-Wen Zhang; Jun Wang; Chen-Lu Lian; Jia-Yuan Sun; Zhen-Yu He; San-Gang Wu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

4.  21-Gene Recurrence Score and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision for Breast Cancer Patients with Positive Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Yiwei Tong; Jiayi Wu; Ou Huang; Jianrong He; Li Zhu; Weiguo Chen; Yafen Li; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  How Canadian Oncologists Use Oncotype DX for Treatment of Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xiaofu Zhu; Susan Dent; Lise Paquet; Tinghua Zhang; Daniel Tesolin; Nadine Graham; Olexiy Aseyev; Xinni Song
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  PONDx: real-life utilization and decision impact of the 21-gene assay on clinical practice in Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Cognetti; Riccardo Masetti; Alessandra Fabi; Giulia Bianchi; Donatella Santini; Alessia Rognone; Giovanna Catania; Domenico Angelucci; Giuseppe Naso; Mario Giuliano; Lucia Vassalli; Patrizia Vici; Giovanni Scognamiglio; Daniele Generali; Alberto Zambelli; Marco Colleoni; Corrado Tinterri; Francesco Scanzi; Leonardo Vigna; Paola Scavina; Teresa Gamucci; Emilia Marrazzo; Angelo Fedele Scinto; Rossana Berardi; Maria Agnese Fabbri; Graziella Pinotti; Daniela Franco; Daniela Andreina Terribile; Giuseppe Tonini; Daniela Cianniello; Sandro Barni
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2021-05-05

7.  Practice-Changing Use of the 21-Gene Test for the Management of Patients With Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Latin America.

Authors:  Henry L Gomez; Juan E Bargallo-Rocha; Roberto J Billinghurst; Aníbal R Núñez De Pierro; Federico A Coló; Lisandro L B Gil; Carola Allemand; Ignacio L McLean; Mauricio Lema-Medina; Fernando Herazo-Maya; Francisco J Terrier; Raquel G Cwilich; Mauricio Leon; Silvia G Falcon; Roberto E Castaño; Sergio C Oliveira; Debbie M Jakubowski; Calvin Chao
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-08

8.  Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Treatment Decisions and Cost in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Quebec.

Authors:  Saima Hassan; Rami Younan; Erica Patocskai; Louise Provencher; Brigitte Poirier; Luca Sideris; Pierre Dubé; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Malorie Chabot-Blanchet; Marie-Claude Guertin; Jean-François Boileau; André Robidoux
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

9.  Gene Expression Profiling Tests for Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 10.  The Role of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Node-Positive Breast Cancer: The Canadian Experience.

Authors:  Mariya Yordanova; Saima Hassan
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.